| Literature DB >> 35049980 |
Zhiyang Fu1, Yuanyuan Liu1, Meijie Xu1, Xiaojun Yao2, Hong Wang1, Huawei Zhang1,3.
Abstract
Endophytic fungi are one of prolific sources of bioactive natural products with potential application in biomedicine and agriculture. In our continuous search for antimicrobial secondary metabolites from Fusarium oxysporum R1 associated with traditional Chinese medicinal plant Rumex madaio Makino using one strain many compounds (OSMAC) strategy, two diastereomeric polyketides neovasifuranones A (3) and B (4) were obtained from its solid rice medium together with N-(2-phenylethyl)acetamide (1), 1-(3-hydroxy-2-methoxyphenyl)-ethanone (2) and 1,2-seco-trypacidin (5). Their planar structures were unambiguously determined using 1D NMR and MS spectroscopy techniques as well as comparison with the literature data. By a combination of the modified Mosher's reactions and chiroptical methods using time-dependent density functional theory-electronic circular dichroism (TDDFT-ECD) and optical rotatory dispersion (ORD), the absolute configurations of compounds 3 and 4 are firstly confirmed and, respectively, characterized as (4S,7S,8R), (4S,7S,8S). Bioassay results indicate that these metabolites 1-5 exhibit weak inhibitory effect on Helicobacter pylori 159 with MIC values of ≥16 μg/mL. An in-depth discussion for enhancement of fungal metabolite diversity is also proposed in this work.Entities:
Keywords: Fusarium oxysporum; Mosher’s reaction; absolute configuration; chiroptical method; endophytic fungus; secondary metabolite
Year: 2021 PMID: 35049980 PMCID: PMC8779425 DOI: 10.3390/jof8010040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds 1–5 from Fusarium oxysporum R1.
NMR spectral data for compounds 3 and 4 (1H, 600 MHz and 13C 150 MHz).
| Position | Compound 3 (in DMSO- | Compound 4 (in CDCl3) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 189.6 | 190. 9 | ||
| 2 | 112.1 | 112.4 | ||
| 3 | 203.9 | 206.6 | ||
| 4 | 87.7 | 89.1 | ||
| 5 | 121.7 | 5.37 (1H, | 123.2 | 5.42 (1H, |
| 6 | 143.5 | 144.1 | ||
| 7 | 78.0 | 3.60 (1H, | 81.4 | 3.70 (1H, |
| 7-OH | 8.31 (1H, | |||
| 8 | 36.9 | 1.39 (1H, | 37.5 | 1.50 (1H, |
| 9 | 25.9 | 1.06 (1H, | 26.4 | 1.05 (1H, |
| 1.31 (1H, | 1.31 (1H, | |||
| 10 | 11.6 | 0.84 (3H, | 11.9 | 0.87 (3H, |
| 11 | 21.9 | 2.62 (1H, | 22.9 | 2.65 (2H, |
| 2.67 (1H, | ||||
| 12 | 10.5 | 1.16 (3H, | 10.9 | 1.24 (3H, |
| 13 | 50.5 | 4.01 (2H, | 53.1 | 4.24 (2H, |
| 14 | 24.0 | 1.37 (3H, | 24.5 | 1.47 (3H, |
| 15 | 13.6 | 1.60 (3H, | 13.5 | 1.64 (3H, |
| 16 | 13.7 | 0.71 (3H, | 14.3 | 0.84 (3H, |
Figure 2Δδ– values for MTPA esters of compounds 3a and 3b.
Figure 3Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of compound 3.
Figure 4Δδ– values for MTPA esters of compounds 4a and 4b.
Figure 5Experimental ECD spectra of compounds 3 and 4.
In vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori effects of compounds 1-5.
| Compound | MIC Value (μg/mL) |
|---|---|
|
| >16 |
|
| >16 |
|
| >16 |
|
| >16 |
|
| 16 |
| Ampicillin sodium | 4 |