| Literature DB >> 35048055 |
Armelia Sari Widyarman1, Citra Fragrantia Theodorea2, Nadeeka S Udawatte3, Aradhea Monica Drestia4, Endang W Bachtiar2, Tri Erri Astoeti5, Boy M Bachtiar2.
Abstract
Objective: The studies on the influence of geographical and socio-economic factors on the oral microbiome remain underrepresented. The Indonesia basic health research (RISKESDAS) 2018, showed an increasing trend in non-communicable diseases compared with the previous report in 2013. The prevalence of diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and obesity are reported to be higher in urban areas than in rural areas. Interestingly, non-communicable diseases were found to be more prevalent in women than men. This pilot study aimed to examine the oral health and oral microbiome derived from tongue samples of healthy Indonesian women from urban and rural areas.Entities:
Keywords: Indonesia; oral microbiome; pilot study; urban-rural areas; women
Year: 2021 PMID: 35048055 PMCID: PMC8757682 DOI: 10.3389/froh.2021.738306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oral Health ISSN: 2673-4842
Figure 1Overview of the oral microbiota diversity estimates and compositional structure between the two geographical studied populations (A) and (C) Alpha diversity analysis of the samples between the urban and rural subjects and stratified by oral hygiene indicator (OHIS); marginal boxplots describe the distribution of those values for the different groups; respectively. Statistical assessment was carried out using the two-tailed Mann–Whitney test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Alpha-diversity indices. Richness index (Observed OTUs) and richness index (Chao-1) between women in the urban and rural oral microbiome. Letters indicate statistical differences between samples (p < 0.05). (B) and the (D) Microbial community structure of the two groups and the different level of OHIS oral hygiene indicators, respectively measured using the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity is drawn to display changes in microbial communities between two geographical locations. Inserted boxplots show the inter-site distance for samples between two locations and stratified by three different OHIS clinical indicators, respectively. Corresponding R2 and p-values from permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA) tests were also shown. Letters indicate statistical differences between the samples *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001. (E) Venn Diagram representing the 18 most abundant genera shared between the rural and urban groups.
Figure 2Taxonomical variation in oral microbiota between urban and rural women. (A) Relative abundance of the top 10 phyla between urban and rural subjects. (B) Heat map of the most abundant genera in each sample. The color intensity in each box indicates the relative percentage of a genus in each sample. The relative abundance data were z-scored normalized by row. To show the distribution of abundant operational taxonomic units (OTUs), the relative abundances of OTU data were normalized to have a mean of 0 and an SD of 1 (z-score normalization). The plot was made using the heatmap R package with the default parameters. The distribution of the OTUs is represented as the color intensity of each grid (blue, low abundance; red, high abundance). (C) Most significantly changed genera (genus Prevetolla and Leptorticia) relative to the abundance among the top 10 predominant genera (Genera with average relative abundance >3%) of the studied subjects shown. DefSeq2 analysis was used with the log2foldchange value, and multiple comparisons were corrected using the Benjamini–Hochberg correction (Q parameter = 0.1, FDR < 10%), ***adjusted p < 1.0 × 10−4.
Figure 3Co-occurrence network of oral microflora between two populations. SparCC correlations with r > 0.6 (or < -0.6–0) and p < 0.05 were shown. Each node represents a genus; the size of the node is proportional to the median relative abundance of the corresponding genus; connecting edges indicate correlations between them; the green and red colors represent the urban and rural population in the shared genus, respectively. The solid lines represent positive (Co-occurrence) (red) and negative (Co-excluding) (blue) correlations, n = 165. (A) SparCC correlation network between urban and rural oral microbiota with r > 0.6 (or < −0.6–0.) and p < 0.05. (B) SparCC correlation network in identified dominant oral core microbiome (Streptococcus and Prevetolla) between urban and rural localities with r > 0.7 (or <-0.7–0) and p < 0.05. (C) Identification and highest ranking of OTU contributions (a) to geographic co-occurrence pattern of oral microflora between two localities (>0.7 and p < 0.01). (See Supplementary Tables 3, 4). (D) Statistical differential bacterial taxonomical features regarding two geographical locations at the species level; illustrating most significant bacterial species in variations of different proportions among dominant core oral microbiome between two localities using STAMP tool. P < 0.01 to detect species with the most statistically significant differences filtered using a q-value of 0.05 and effective size of 0.05 threshold in STAMP.
Figure 4The results of the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LefSe) analysis of the rural and urban oral microflora. Linear discriminant analysis effect size identifies taxa that are statistically different in biological states but also provides a magnitude of the effect. The histogram of the LDA scores was computed for the differentially abundant taxa between the rural and urban oral microflora. The bar size represents the effect of the size of specific taxa in the particular group at the species level. The LEfSe scores (LDA score) can be interpreted as the degree of consistent difference in relative abundance between features in the two classes of analyzed microbial communities. The histogram thus identifies which clades among all those detected as statistically and biologically differential explain the greatest differences between communities. (A) An LDA score value of 2.0 was chosen as a threshold for discriminative features (B) An LDA score value of 3.0 was chosen as a threshold for discriminative features. (C) Histogram of most significantly differentially abundant species of (in the 01 interval) Leptotrichia wadei and Prevotella melamninogenica in urban and rural samples and subclasses stratified by different levels of OHIS oral hygiene indicators represented by red (good), blues(moderate) and green (poor).