Literature DB >> 35047595

Ninety-four thousand-case retrospective study on antibacterial drug resistance of Helicobacter pylori.

Yu Zhang1, Fei Meng2, Jie Jin2, Jun Wang1, Bin-Bin Gu1, Jin-Bang Peng1, Li-Ping Ye1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The resistance rate to antibacterial drugs is the key inhibitor of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication treatment. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and drug resistance of H. pylori based on big data.
METHODS: Gastric mucosal specimens were collected from naive patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for H. pylori culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), including clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole and amoxicillin. Every 10 years of age was grouped as an age group. The H. pylori infection and resistance were explored based on the age group and gender.
RESULTS: The number of H. pylori-positive specimen was 94509 in 283823 gastric mucosal specimens, with an infection rate of 33.30%. The infection rate increased with age, and males had a higher infection rate than females. The average resistance rate of H. pylori to amoxicillin and metronidazole was 0.21% and 93.72%, which remained stable. The average resistance rate to clarithromycin was 23.99% with an increasing trend from 14.43% to 38.24%. The average resistance rate to levofloxacin was 30.29%, which increased from 17.07% to 39.42% and mostly stabilized after 2017. The resistance rate of H. pylori increased with age, except amoxicillin. H. pylori in females are at higher risk of resistance to metronidazole, but not to amoxicillin, regardless of the age group. Meanwhile, H. pylori in females are at higher risk of resistance to levofloxacin and clarithromycin in the 21-50 age group. The single, dual, triple and quadruple-drug resistance rate was 54.59%, 29.03%, 11.71% and 0.11%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The resistance of H. pylori in Taizhou city is serious. Guided by the consensus report, individualized treatment based on AST is recommended. ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age group; Gender; Helicobacter pylori; Infection; Resistance

Year:  2021        PMID: 35047595      PMCID: PMC8678885          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i35.10838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


Core Tip: We shared a 10-year data in prevalence and resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in Taizhou city, Zhejiang province, China. We found that the infection rate increased with age, and males had a higher infection rate than females. The resistance rate of H. pylori to metronidazole, clarithromycin and levofloxacin was increased with age. H. pylori in females are at higher risk of resistance to metronidazole, but not to amoxicillin, regardless of the age group. Meanwhile, H. pylori in females are at higher risk of resistance to levofloxacin and clarithromycin in the 21-50 age group.

INTRODUCTION

According to the estimates by GLOBOCAN, 1033701 individuals developed gastric cancer, and an estimated 782685 related deaths occurred in 2018[1]. In China, gastric cancer is ranked second for incidence rate and third for mortality rates among all cancers, while in Western Europe, the incidence rate ranks 9th and the mortality rate ranks 6th. In North America, the incidence rate and mortality rates of gastric cancer rank 13th and 9th respectively[2]. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the most important pathogenic factor of gastric cancer which accounted for 44.2% of new gastric cancer cases globally[2]. H. pylori was estimated to be responsible for more than 78.00% of new gastric cancer cases in 2018, and the total number of H. pylori-related cases is not expected to decrease for decades due to global population growth and aging[3]. Moreover, H. pylori causes substantial morbidity from various peptic ulcer diseases, gastritis and even gastric lymphoma. H. pylori is classified as carcinogenic (Group 1) to humans by the Monographs program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer[4]. Several recent publications have demonstrated the global prevalence of H. pylori infection to be approximately 50%[5,6]. Large differences were observed between areas within large countries, such as China, which is one of the countries with the highest prevalence of H. pylori infection[7]. Wuwei city has a much higher H. pylori prevalence (72.28%) than all other areas in China, followed by Fengkai city (55.90%). Dali city has the lowest H. pylori prevalence of 11.36%[8]. Effective treatment for H. pylori infection with a combination of antibacterial drugs, proton pump inhibitors and bismuth all contribute to a decline in peptic ulcer disease incidence and the gastric cancer mortality rate. The resistance rate to antibacterial drugs is the key inhibitor of H. pylori eradication treatment. Some data that describe the resistance rates of H. pylori indicate a correlation with age[9]. Populations of different ages with various antibiotic usage habits may have different resistances to antibacterial drugs used for H. pylori treatment, and this result will be more apparent when examined by big data analysis. Thus, big data-based H. pylori prevalence and drug resistance statistical programs are critical. In this study, we shared a 10-year data analysis on the prevalence and resistance of H. pylori in Taizhou city, Zhejiang Province, China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Research object

This multicenter retrospective study was conducted from January 2011 to December 2020 in Taizhou city, Zhejiang Province, China. Gastric mucosal specimens were collected from patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for H. pylori culture and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Patients in this study followed the enrollment criteria: (1) With gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, acid reflux and nausea, etc.; (2) Gastroscopic diagnosed as gastric, duodenal peptic ulcer and chronic gastritis with erosion, etc.; (3) No severe damage to heart, liver, and kidney function, and no allergies to antibacterial drugs used in AST; (4) Non-pregnant or breastfeeding women, no gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, pyloric obstruction, or cancer complications; (5) Have not taken any antibacterial drugs, bismuth, H2 receptor antagonist or proton-pump inhibitors within half a month; and (6) Agree to conduct gastric mucosal tissue sampling, H. pylori culture and in vitro AST, and signed their informed consent. The study had been approved by the ethics committee of Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province.

Sample collection

A gastric mucosal specimen was collected from lesser curvature of the gastric antrum, greater curvature of the gastric body, or the tissue adjacent to the lesion. After biopsy, the specimen was immersed in H. pylori preservation tube containing brain heart infusion. All specimens were transported on dry ice throughout the entire process to Zhiyuan Medical Inspection Institute Co., Ltd. for H. pylori culture, isolation, identification and AST.

H. pylori isolation, culture and identification

Thawed the gastric mucosal specimen at room temperature and fully ground it into homogenate with 600 μL of brain heart infusion in a glass grinder. Spread the tissue homogenate on a Columbia blood plate (OXOID, England) containing 5% sheep blood by streaking. Cultivated the H. pylori in a 37 °C mixed gas incubator (5% O2, 10% CO2 and 85% N2) for 2-3 d. Extended the culture time to 7 d if there was no growth. Picked out and subcultured the monoclonal colonies with typical colony morphology. Then smeared microscopy with the suspected H. pylori strain and carried out the biochemical experiments with urease (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China), oxidase (Beijing Luqiao Technology Co., Ltd., China) and catalase (Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China). Suspected strains with biological morphology and biochemical reactions were identified as H. pylori, and the patient was diagnosed as positive for H. pylori infection. Extended the culture time to 7 d, and if there was still no H. pylori strain growth on the medium, the patient was diagnosed as negative for H. pylori infection.

AST

The plate incorporation assay was used to test the antimicrobial susceptibility of H. pylori strains[10]. The critical points of antibacterial resistance referred to the value of H. pylori clinical susceptibility test in China[11,12]: 1 μg/mL for clarithromycin (National Institute for Food and Drug Control, China), 2 μg/mL for levofloxacin (National Institute for Food and Drug Control, China), 8 μg/mL for metronidazole (National Institute for Food and Drug Control, China), and 2 μg/mL for amoxicillin (Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH, Germany). We diluted and added these 4 kinds of antibacterial drugs to sterile Columbia culture medium containing 5% sheep blood respectively and ensured the concentration of antibacterial drugs to the critical point. After mixing well, poured into the plate to prepare 4 kinds of blood plates containing the antibacterial drugs. Collected H. pylori strains with good growth status, and diluted the strains with 0.9% normal saline to a concentration of 0.5 McFarland, about 1.5 × 108/mL[10]. Drew 2 μL of the diluted bacterial solution and inoculated on the conventional Columbia blood plate and the Columbia blood plate containing antibacterial drug, respectively. Cultivated the H. pylori in a 37 °C mixed gas incubator (5% O2, 10% CO2 and 85% N2) for 2 d. Firstly, we observed the growth of H. pylori strains on the conventional blood plate. The H. pylori strains with good growth status proved that its antimicrobial susceptibility results are credible. The H. pylori strains with poor growth status or not growing needed to undergo a new AST. Secondly, we observed the growth of H. pylori strains on the blood plate containing antibacterial drug. An inhibited growth of the H. pylori strain on the blood plate containing antibacterial drug was judged to be sensitive to the antibacterial drug, and the uninhibited growth of the H. pylori strain was judged to be resistant to the antibacterial drug. The NCTC11637 standard strain was selected as the quality control bacteria.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 software were used. Using chi-square test to perform statistical analysis on count data. Odds ratio (OR) was used to evaluate risk factors. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used to evaluate a linear relationship. Breslow-Day method was used for the test of Homogeneity of OR. P < 0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

RESULTS

H. pylori infection

Basic information: From 2011 to 2020, a total of 283823 gastric mucosal specimens were cultured from patients with peptic ulcer disease. The ratio of males to females was 1.01:1.00. The ages of the participants ranged from 3 to 97, and the average age was 48.52 ± 14.04. The number of H. pylori-positive specimens was 94509; thus, the overall positive rate of H. pylori infection reached 33.30%. The ratio of male to female patients who were positive for H. pylori was 1.08:1.00. The ages of these patients ranged from 4 to 96, and the average age was 50.79 ± 12.76. Every 10 years of age was grouped as an age group, resulting in division into 8 age groups: ≤ 20 years, 21-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80 and ≥ 81 years; this division was close to a normal distribution (P = 0.383) (Table 1).
Table 1

Basic information of specimen tested for H. pylori infection (n)

Age group Infection rate (%) Tested specimen
H. pylori–positive specimen
Multivariable analysis
Total
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
OR
95%CIa
P value
Total33.30283823142851140972945094913945370---
≤ 2022.4948252576224910856244611.2401.082 1.4210.002
21-3026.782168111655100265807319626111.0731.010 1.1400.022
31-4027.2446803237202308312750668860621.1031.059 1.1480.000
41-5029.768090739271416362407812156119221.1171.084 1.1520.000
51-6038.867222935077371522806614284137821.1651.131 1.2000.000
61-7043.3340951210651988617744925084941.0501.010 1.0920.014
71-8032.3913939786660734515263518801.1231.046 1.2070.001
≥ 8118.65248816218674643061581.0440.844 1.2920.690

95%confidence interval (lower bound, upper bound).

CI: Confidence interval; H. pylori: Helicobacter pylori.

Basic information of specimen tested for H. pylori infection (n) 95%confidence interval (lower bound, upper bound). CI: Confidence interval; H. pylori: Helicobacter pylori. Gender and risk of : A total of 142851 males and 140972 females were tested for H. pylori infection; of these, 49139 males and 45370 females tested positive for H. pylori infection. Compared with females, males had a higher rate of H. pylori infection (OR = 1.105, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.088-1.122). Relationship between age and The results of the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test showed that there was a linear relationship between age and the rate of H. pylori infection (χ2 = 2577.812, P < 0.001). The Pearson-related results showed that r = 0.095, P < 0.001, indicating that the H. pylori infection rate increased with age. Multivariable analysis of The homogeneity of OR test showed P = 0.003, suggesting that the OR values between age groups were heterogeneous, and it was not appropriate to combine the OR values. Therefore, after stratifying according to age group, male gender was determined to be a risk factor for H. pylori infection, except for the population aged ≥ 81-years-old (OR = 1.044, 95%CI: 0.844-1.292, P = 0.690). For the ≤ 20-years-old age group, the risk of H. pylori infection was 1.240 times higher in males than in females (OR = 1.240, 95%CI: 1.082-1.421, P = 0.002). For different age groups between 21-years-old and 80-years-old, the risk of H. pylori infection was 1.073, 1.103, 1.117, 1.165, 1.050, and 1.123 times higher in males than in females, respectively (Table 1).

Antibacterial resistance of H. pylori

The overall resistance rate of : The average resistance rate of H. pylori to amoxicillin was 0.21% and slightly increased in 2017 and 2018 to 1.15% and 0.87%, respectively. The average resistance rate of H. pylori to metronidazole was 93.72%, remained at a high level and fluctuated in the range of 92.71% to 96.92%, except for when the rate fell to 86.64% in 2016. Different from the trends of these two antibacterial drugs, the average resistance rate of H. pylori to clarithromycin was 23.99% and had an increasing trend (from 14.43% in 2013 to 38.24% in 2020) (Figure 1). The average resistance rate of H. pylori to levofloxacin was 30.29%, which increased over time (from 17.07% in 2013 to 39.42% in 2017) and mostly stabilized after 2017. The results of the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test and Pearson-related results showed a linear increase for resistance to clarithromycin (χ2 = 2389.117, r = 0.159, P < 0.001) and for resistance to levofloxacin (χ2 = 1901.809, r = 0.142, P < 0.001).
Figure 1

Trends of Helicobacter pylori resistance to four antibacterial drugs with years.

Trends of Helicobacter pylori resistance to four antibacterial drugs with years. Gender and risk of : The number of males infected with H. pylori who were resistant to levofloxacin was 14051, and the resistance rate was 28.59%, while the number of females infected with H. pylori who were resistant was 14578, with a resistance rate of 32.13%. Compared with that of males, the H. pylori resistance rate was higher in females (OR = 1.182, 95%CI: 1.159-1.216). The resistance rates to clarithromycin in males and females were 22.93% and 25.14%, respectively, and the H. pylori resistance rate to clarithromycin in females was higher than that in males (OR = 1.129, 95%CI: 1.095-1.163). Similarly, the H. pylori resistance rate to metronidazole in females (94.44%) was higher than that in males (93.05%) (OR = 1.267, 95%CI: 1.202-1.337). There was no significant difference in the resistance rate of H. pylori to amoxicillin between different genders (OR = 0.880, 95%CI: 0.663-1.169). Relationship between age and : Overall, the resistance rate to amoxicillin was low (< 0.35%). The resistance rate to metronidazole mostly stabilized after increasing from 75.39% to 96.49% in the population < 60-years-old, and the resistance rate of the population ≥ 61-years-old remained at approximately 98%. The resistance rate to clarithromycin increased rapidly in the population ≥ 61 years of age, changing from 21.02% to 39.01%. The resistance rate to levofloxacin continuously increased from 10.32% to 48.71% with increasing age. The results from the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test and the Pearson relationship showed that there was a linear and positive relationship between age and resistance rate of H. pylori to the three kinds of antibacterial drugs, except for a negative relationship to amoxicillin resistance (χ2 = 1356.563, r = 0.120, P < 0.001 for levofloxacin; χ2 = 153.312, r = 0.040, P < 0.001 for clarithromycin; χ2 = 3685.476, r = 0.197, P < 0.001 for metronidazole; and χ2 = 24.710, r = -0.016, P < 0.001 for amoxicillin) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Trends of Helicobacter pylori resistance to four antibacterial drugs with age groups.

Trends of Helicobacter pylori resistance to four antibacterial drugs with age groups. Multivariable analysis of resistance rates: Furthermore, we conducted an analysis on the correlation of age and gender with the H. pylori resistance rates to levofloxacin, clarithromycin and metronidazole (Figure 3).
Figure 3

A: The resistance to levofloxacin; B: The resistance to clarithromycin; C: The resistance to metronidazole; D: The resistance to amoxicillin. aP < 0.05. There were significant differences of the resistance between males and females.

A: The resistance to levofloxacin; B: The resistance to clarithromycin; C: The resistance to metronidazole; D: The resistance to amoxicillin. aP < 0.05. There were significant differences of the resistance between males and females. Resistance rate to levofloxacin: The homogeneity of OR test showed P < 0.001, suggesting that the OR values between age groups are heterogeneous, and it is not appropriate to combine OR values. Therefore, after stratifying according to age group, there was no significant difference in the resistance rate of H. pylori to levofloxacin between female and male, aged ≤ 20-years-old and aged ≥ 51-years-old (P > 0.05). However, for the 21-50 age group, H. pylori in female was at a higher risk of resistance to levofloxacin than in male. For the 21-30 age group, the risk of H. pylori developing resistance to levofloxacin was 1.525 times higher in females than in males (OR = 1.525, 95%CI: 1.330-1.748, P < 0.001). For the 31-40 age group, the risk of H. pylori developing resistance to levofloxacin was 1.604 times higher in females than in males (OR = 1.604, 95%CI: 1.483-1.735, P < 0.001), and for the 41-50 age group, the risk was 1.325 times higher in females than in males (OR = 1.325, 95%CI: 1.253-1.400, P < 0.001). Resistance rate to clarithromycin: The homogeneity of OR test showed P < 0.001. After stratifying according to age group, there was no significant difference in the resistance rate of H. pylori to clarithromycin between females and males, aged ≤ 20-years-old and aged ≥ 51-years-old (P > 0.05). For the 21-50 age groups, H. pylori in females was at a higher risk of resistance to clarithromycin than in males. For the 21-30 age group, the risk of H. pylori developing resistance to clarithromycin was 1.356 times higher in females than in males (OR = 1.356, 95%CI: 1.192-1.544, P < 0.001). For the 31-40 age group, the risk of H. pylori developing resistance to clarithromycin 1.495 times higher in females than in males (OR = 1.495, 95%CI: 1.379-1.622, P < 0.001). For the 41-50 age group, the risk of H. pylori developing resistance to clarithromycin was 1.175 times higher in females than in males (OR = 1.175, 95%CI: 1.107-1.246, P < 0.001). Resistance rate to metronidazole: The homogeneity of OR test showed P = 0.056, suggesting that the OR values between the age groups are homogeneous. Therefore, after controlling the age groups, H. pylori in females was at a higher risk of the resistance to metronidazole (OR = 1.257, 95%CI: 0.190-1.327, P < 0.001). Thus, regardless of the age group, the H. pylori resistance rate to metronidazole was approximately 1.257 times in females than that in males.

Multidrug resistance of H. pylori

Multidrug resistance of H. pylori to the four antibacterial drugs is shown in Table 2. Among the 94509 positive specimens, the overall resistance rate to the four antibacterial drugs reached 95.44%, of which the single-drug resistance rate was 54.59%, the dual-drug resistance rate was 29.03%, the triple-drug resistance rate was 11.71%, and the quadruple-drug resistance rate was 0.11%. According to the comparison of gender, the single-drug resistance rate in males was significantly higher than that of females (χ = 44.337, P < 0.001), while the multidrug resistance rate in females was higher than that in males, especially the triple-drug resistance rate (χ2 = 188.305, P < 0.001).
Table 2

The multiple-drug resistance of H. pylori to the four antibacterial drugs, n

Antibacterial drugs
Total
Male
Female
Sensitivea431424851829
LEV626362264
CLA557332225
MTR504132664223771
AMX000
LEV + CLA444234210
LEV + MTR1641983438076
LEV + AMX110
CLA + MTR1055155994952
CLA + AMX000
MTR + AMX17143
LEV + CLA + MTR1099050355955
LEV + CLA + AMX000
LEV + MTR + AMX482523
CLA + MTR + AMX281612
LEV + CLA + MTR + AMX1015150

Sensitive to all four antibacterial drugs. CLA: Clarithromycin; LEV: Levofloxacin; MTR: Metronidazole; AMX: Amoxicillin.

The multiple-drug resistance of H. pylori to the four antibacterial drugs, n Sensitive to all four antibacterial drugs. CLA: Clarithromycin; LEV: Levofloxacin; MTR: Metronidazole; AMX: Amoxicillin.

DISCUSSION

The infection rate of H. pylori in China is approximately 55%[13], while the detection rate of H. pylori culture is only approximately 30%. A variety of reasons may affect the positivity rate of H. pylori culture, including the colonization of H. pylori at the biopsy site[14], the influence of PPIs and antibacterial drugs on microbial cultures[15], and even contamination in the process of microbial culture. However, the drug susceptibility test based on H. pylori culture can provide doctors with guidance for prescribing clinical medication and is the key to individualized treatment. With an annually increasing rate of antibacterial resistance, individualized treatment based on drug susceptibility results is recommended in China. Therefore, the cultivation of H. pylori is still important and is the gold standard for detecting H. pylori infection. In this study, we shared a 10-year data analysis on the infection and resistance of H. pylori in Taizhou city, Zhejiang Province, China. A total of 283823 gastric mucosal specimens were examined, and the H. pylori infection rate was 33.30%. Age was determined to be related with the H. pylori infection. The population aged ≤ 20-years-old had the lowest infection rate of 22.49%, and the population aged 61-70 years had the highest infection rate of 43.33%. The infection rate increased with age; however, the prevalence of H. pylori infection in children and adolescents is worthy of attention. The reported rates of H. pylori infection among children and adolescents in different areas of China range from 18.62% to 72.28%[16,17]. The "Kyoto global consensus report on H. pylori gastritis" proposes that H. pylori infection is an infectious disease[18], and it can be transmitted through mouth-to-mouth, stomach-to-mouth, feces-to-mouth and other routes. Thus, in addition to the limited awareness of hygiene and health, the traditional eating style (sharing food from the same plates) observed in China may play a role in the transmission of H. pylori. The diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection in children and adolescents requires special attention. In the absence of effective treatment, an H. pylori infection may be lifelong. On the other hand, males were found to have a higher risk of H. pylori infection than that for females, and Dutta et al[19] reported the same results. Some habits, such as smoking, may be indirectly related to this result[20]. In Taizhou city, 48.00% of males smoke, while only 1.19% of females smoke[21]. The habit of smoking may lead to an increase in the secretion of gastric acid and pepsin, thereby destroying the health of the gastric mucosa and promoting the colonization of H. pylori. H. pylori has high resistance rates to antibacterial drugs in Taizhou city, and these rates have gradually increased over time. The resistance of H. pylori to amoxicillin remains low (0.21%), while that to metronidazole is high (93.72%) throughout China[22,23]. In the 10 years examined in this study, the resistance rates to clarithromycin and levofloxacin significantly increased by 23.81% and 22.35%, respectively. The resistance rate of H. pylori increases with age[9]. In this study, the resistance rate to clarithromycin and metronidazole for the population aged ≥ 81-years-old was 15.60% and 21.59% higher, respectively, than those for the population aged ≤ 20-years-old, and the difference in levofloxacin resistance reached 38.38%. The application of antibacterial drugs in the population is one of the external factors contributing to the development of H. pylori resistance, and the resistance of H. pylori detected for the population aged ≤ 20-years-old, who seldom use antibacterial drugs, may be related to the resistance of the H. pylori itself. After controlling for age group, females showed a higher incidence of H. pylori resistance to metronidazole[24], which was approximately 1.257 times higher than that of males. This result is in agreement with data presented by Mirzaei et al[25]. Metronidazole is used in a wide variety of applications and is typically used in the treatment of anaerobic infections in the female reproductive system or for treating Trichomonas vaginalis infections[26]. In this study, H. pylori in females was at a higher risk of resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin for the population aged 21-50 years; this finding is different from the data presented by Shu et al[27]. A study by Shao et al[24] reported results in agreement with ours. In addition, the incidence of multidrug resistance in females was higher than that in males. These phenomena may be related to hormones, genetic differences, and the frequency of antibiotic use. For levofloxacin and clarithromycin, the younger population, aged ≤ 20-years-old, had a similar medication background. For the population aged ≥ 51-years-old, the physical fitness and immunity of individuals decreases with age, and medications increase and vary. Due to the accumulation of medication over the years, the difference between female and male decreases, while the difference between age group increases. For the population in the middle-aged 21-50 group, their physical fitness is relatively healthy, and their immunity is strong. Therefore, the use of antibacterial agents will affect the resistance rates in H. pylori. Some research indicates that for some less serious infections, such as colds, females are relatively more willing to receive antibiotic treatment, while males are often accustomed to relying on their own immunity. Therefore, female medication habits may be one of the reasons why the resistance rate in females is higher than that in males[28]. Resistance to antibacterial drugs poses a huge challenge to H. pylori eradication therapy. Experts from all over the world have jointly issued some consensus reports, and a number of consensus reports have been published based on the resistance rates of H. pylori in China. The “Fifth Chinese National Consensus Report on the management of H. pylori infection” (“Fifth Chinese National Consensus Report”) indicated that quadruple therapy containing clarithromycin and metronidazole was not recommended in empirical therapy when the dual-drug resistance rate is over 15.00%[29]. In Taizhou city, the dual-drug resistance rate to clarithromycin and metronidazole is 11.16%, although resistance rates to each drug individually are high. Furthermore, the “Fifth Chinese National Consensus Report”, published in December 2016, proposed that treatment therapy containing levofloxacin was not recommended for initial H. pylori eradication because of its high resistance rate[28]. Following the consensus recommendations, the resistance rate to levofloxacin decreased slightly and remained stable after 2017 in Taizhou, which was an obvious result.

Limits of study

The purpose of this study is to study the prevalence and drug resistance of H. pylori. The detection methods for H. pylori infection include microbial culture, pathological testing, 13C urease breath test, nucleic acid testing, etc., and the combined detection of multiple methods can improve the detection rate of H. pylori. However, some of these methods were not widely and continuously used in the early stages of this study. In this paper, we mainly analyzed the data obtained through microbial culture, which can reflect the changes of H. pylori prevalence to a certain extent.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence and resistance of H. pylori in Taizhou city are serious. The prevalence of H. pylori increased with age, and the male was at a higher risk of H. pylori prevalence. The resistance rate increased with age, and H. pylori in females, age 21-years-old to 50-years-old, was at a higher risk of resistance to levofloxacin and clarithromycin. Guided by the consensus report, individualized treatment based on an AST is recommended.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Research background

The trend of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) prevalence and antibacterial drug resistance is getting more serious.

Research motivation

To provide guidance on the use of antimicrobial drugs for H. pylori eradication treatment based on the trend of antimicrobial resistance.

Research objectives

Big data-based research of H. pylori prevalence and antimicrobial resistance trends in Taizhou, Zhejiang Province were performed.

Research methods

Carried out the statistical analysis of the results of gastric mucosal tissue sample culture and drug susceptibility tests in Taizhou in the past 10 years, and explored the differences between different age groups and gender of the H. pylori prevalence and antibacterial drug resistance rates.

Research results

The prevalence of H. pylori increased with age, and males were at a higher risk of H. pylori prevalence. The resistance rate increased with age, and H. pylori in females, age 21-years-old to 50-years-old, were at a higher risk of resistance to levofloxacin and clarithromycin.

Research conclusions

The prevalence and resistance of H. pylori in Taizhou city are serious.

Research perspectives

Guided by the consensus report, individualized treatment based on an AST is recommended.
  21 in total

1.  Exploring current status of Helicobacter pylori infection in different age groups of patients with dyspepsia.

Authors:  Amit K Dutta; Viswanath D Reddy; Venkatkrishnan H Iyer; L S Unnikrishnan; Ashok Chacko
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-24

2.  Relation of smoking and alcohol and coffee consumption to active Helicobacter pylori infection: cross sectional study.

Authors:  H Brenner; D Rothenbacher; G Bode; G Adler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-12-06

Review 3.  Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  James K Y Hooi; Wan Ying Lai; Wee Khoon Ng; Michael M Y Suen; Fox E Underwood; Divine Tanyingoh; Peter Malfertheiner; David Y Graham; Vincent W S Wong; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan; Joseph J Y Sung; Gilaad G Kaplan; Siew C Ng
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Negative Effect of Proton-pump Inhibitors (PPIs) on Helicobacter pylori Growth, Morphology, and Urease Test and Recovery after PPI Removal--An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Parastoo Saniee; Somayeh Shahreza; Farideh Siavoshi
Journal:  Helicobacter       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: a worldwide incidence analysis.

Authors:  Catherine de Martel; Damien Georges; Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Gary M Clifford
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 26.763

6.  Primary resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxicillin of Helicobacter pylori isolated from Tunisian patients with peptic ulcers and gastritis: a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Khansa Ben Mansour; Christophe Burucoa; Meriem Zribi; Afef Masmoudi; Sami Karoui; Lamia Kallel; Soufiène Chouaib; Samira Matri; Monia Fekih; Sonia Zarrouk; Mounir Labbene; Jalel Boubaker; Imed Cheikh; Mongi Ben Hriz; Nadia Siala; Abdelkarim Ayadi; Azza Filali; Nabil Ben Mami; Taoufik Najjar; Ahmed Maherzi; Mohamed Tahar Sfar; Chedlia Fendri
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 7.  Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis.

Authors:  Kentaro Sugano; Jan Tack; Ernst J Kuipers; David Y Graham; Emad M El-Omar; Soichiro Miura; Ken Haruma; Masahiro Asaka; Naomi Uemura; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The Association of Age and Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter Pylori: A Study in Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, China.

Authors:  Zizhong Ji; Feng Han; Fei Meng; Miaoying Tu; Ningmin Yang; Jianzhong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Novel and Effective Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter pylori in an Era of Increasing Antibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  Yi Hu; Yin Zhu; Nong-Hua Lu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.

Authors:  Christina Fitzmaurice; Degu Abate; Naghmeh Abbasi; Hedayat Abbastabar; Foad Abd-Allah; Omar Abdel-Rahman; Ahmed Abdelalim; Amir Abdoli; Ibrahim Abdollahpour; Abdishakur S M Abdulle; Nebiyu Dereje Abebe; Haftom Niguse Abraha; Laith Jamal Abu-Raddad; Ahmed Abualhasan; Isaac Akinkunmi Adedeji; Shailesh M Advani; Mohsen Afarideh; Mahdi Afshari; Mohammad Aghaali; Dominic Agius; Sutapa Agrawal; Ayat Ahmadi; Elham Ahmadian; Ehsan Ahmadpour; Muktar Beshir Ahmed; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Tomi Akinyemiju; Ziyad Al-Aly; Assim M AlAbdulKader; Fares Alahdab; Tahiya Alam; Genet Melak Alamene; Birhan Tamene T Alemnew; Kefyalew Addis Alene; Cyrus Alinia; Vahid Alipour; Syed Mohamed Aljunid; Fatemeh Allah Bakeshei; Majid Abdulrahman Hamad Almadi; Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Ubai Alsharif; Shirina Alsowaidi; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Erfan Amini; Saeed Amini; Yaw Ampem Amoako; Zohreh Anbari; Nahla Hamed Anber; Catalina Liliana Andrei; Mina Anjomshoa; Fereshteh Ansari; Ansariadi Ansariadi; Seth Christopher Yaw Appiah; Morteza Arab-Zozani; Jalal Arabloo; Zohreh Arefi; Olatunde Aremu; Habtamu Abera Areri; Al Artaman; Hamid Asayesh; Ephrem Tsegay Asfaw; Alebachew Fasil Ashagre; Reza Assadi; Bahar Ataeinia; Hagos Tasew Atalay; Zerihun Ataro; Suleman Atique; Marcel Ausloos; Leticia Avila-Burgos; Euripide F G A Avokpaho; Ashish Awasthi; Nefsu Awoke; Beatriz Paulina Ayala Quintanilla; Martin Amogre Ayanore; Henok Tadesse Ayele; Ebrahim Babaee; Umar Bacha; Alaa Badawi; Mojtaba Bagherzadeh; Eleni Bagli; Senthilkumar Balakrishnan; Abbas Balouchi; Till Winfried Bärnighausen; Robert J Battista; Masoud Behzadifar; Meysam Behzadifar; Bayu Begashaw Bekele; Yared Belete Belay; Yaschilal Muche Belayneh; Kathleen Kim Sachiko Berfield; Adugnaw Berhane; Eduardo Bernabe; Mircea Beuran; Nickhill Bhakta; Krittika Bhattacharyya; Belete Biadgo; Ali Bijani; Muhammad Shahdaat Bin Sayeed; Charles Birungi; Catherine Bisignano; Helen Bitew; Tone Bjørge; Archie Bleyer; Kassawmar Angaw Bogale; Hunduma Amensisa Bojia; Antonio M Borzì; Cristina Bosetti; Ibrahim R Bou-Orm; Hermann Brenner; Jerry D Brewer; Andrey Nikolaevich Briko; Nikolay Ivanovich Briko; Maria Teresa Bustamante-Teixeira; Zahid A Butt; Giulia Carreras; Juan J Carrero; Félix Carvalho; Clara Castro; Franz Castro; Ferrán Catalá-López; Ester Cerin; Yazan Chaiah; Wagaye Fentahun Chanie; Vijay Kumar Chattu; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Neelima Singh Chauhan; Mohammad Chehrazi; Peggy Pei-Chia Chiang; Tesfaye Yitna Chichiabellu; Onyema Greg Chido-Amajuoyi; Odgerel Chimed-Ochir; Jee-Young J Choi; Devasahayam J Christopher; Dinh-Toi Chu; Maria-Magdalena Constantin; Vera M Costa; Emanuele Crocetti; Christopher Stephen Crowe; Maria Paula Curado; Saad M A Dahlawi; Giovanni Damiani; Amira Hamed Darwish; Ahmad Daryani; José das Neves; Feleke Mekonnen Demeke; Asmamaw Bizuneh Demis; Birhanu Wondimeneh Demissie; Gebre Teklemariam Demoz; Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez; Afshin Derakhshani; Kalkidan Solomon Deribe; Rupak Desai; Beruk Berhanu Desalegn; Melaku Desta; Subhojit Dey; Samath Dhamminda Dharmaratne; Meghnath Dhimal; Daniel Diaz; Mesfin Tadese Tadese Dinberu; Shirin Djalalinia; David Teye Doku; Thomas M Drake; Manisha Dubey; Eleonora Dubljanin; Eyasu Ejeta Duken; Hedyeh Ebrahimi; Andem Effiong; Aziz Eftekhari; Iman El Sayed; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Shaimaa I El-Jaafary; Ziad El-Khatib; Demelash Abewa Elemineh; Hajer Elkout; Richard G Ellenbogen; Aisha Elsharkawy; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Daniel Adane Endalew; Aman Yesuf Endries; Babak Eshrati; Ibtihal Fadhil; Vahid Fallah Omrani; Mahbobeh Faramarzi; Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi; Andrea Farioli; Farshad Farzadfar; Netsanet Fentahun; Eduarda Fernandes; Garumma Tolu Feyissa; Irina Filip; Florian Fischer; James L Fisher; Lisa M Force; Masoud Foroutan; Marisa Freitas; Takeshi Fukumoto; Neal D Futran; Silvano Gallus; Fortune Gbetoho Gankpe; Reta Tsegaye Gayesa; Tsegaye Tewelde Gebrehiwot; Gebreamlak Gebremedhn Gebremeskel; Getnet Azeze Gedefaw; Belayneh K Gelaw; Birhanu Geta; Sefonias Getachew; Kebede Embaye Gezae; Mansour Ghafourifard; Alireza Ghajar; Ahmad Ghashghaee; Asadollah Gholamian; Paramjit Singh Gill; Themba T G Ginindza; Alem Girmay; Muluken Gizaw; Ricardo Santiago Gomez; Sameer Vali Gopalani; Giuseppe Gorini; Bárbara Niegia Garcia Goulart; Ayman Grada; Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra; Andre Luiz Sena Guimaraes; Prakash C Gupta; Rahul Gupta; Kishor Hadkhale; Arvin Haj-Mirzaian; Arya Haj-Mirzaian; Randah R Hamadeh; Samer Hamidi; Lolemo Kelbiso Hanfore; Josep Maria Haro; Milad Hasankhani; Amir Hasanzadeh; Hamid Yimam Hassen; Roderick J Hay; Simon I Hay; Andualem Henok; Nathaniel J Henry; Claudiu Herteliu; Hagos D Hidru; Chi Linh Hoang; Michael K Hole; Praveen Hoogar; Nobuyuki Horita; H Dean Hosgood; Mostafa Hosseini; Mehdi Hosseinzadeh; Mihaela Hostiuc; Sorin Hostiuc; Mowafa Househ; Mohammedaman Mama Hussen; Bogdan Ileanu; Milena D Ilic; Kaire Innos; Seyed Sina Naghibi Irvani; Kufre Robert Iseh; Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam; Farhad Islami; Nader Jafari Balalami; Morteza Jafarinia; Leila Jahangiry; Mohammad Ali Jahani; Nader Jahanmehr; Mihajlo Jakovljevic; Spencer L James; Mehdi Javanbakht; Sudha Jayaraman; Sun Ha Jee; Ensiyeh Jenabi; Ravi Prakash Jha; Jost B Jonas; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Tamas Joo; Suresh Banayya Jungari; Mikk Jürisson; Ali Kabir; Farin Kamangar; André Karch; Narges Karimi; Ansar Karimian; Amir Kasaeian; Gebremicheal Gebreslassie Kasahun; Belete Kassa; Tesfaye Dessale Kassa; Mesfin Wudu Kassaw; Anil Kaul; Peter Njenga Keiyoro; Abraham Getachew Kelbore; Amene Abebe Kerbo; Yousef Saleh Khader; Maryam Khalilarjmandi; Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Gulfaraz Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Khaled Khatab; Amir Khater; Maryam Khayamzadeh; Maryam Khazaee-Pool; Salman Khazaei; Abdullah T Khoja; Mohammad Hossein Khosravi; Jagdish Khubchandani; Neda Kianipour; Daniel Kim; Yun Jin Kim; Adnan Kisa; Sezer Kisa; Katarzyna Kissimova-Skarbek; Hamidreza Komaki; Ai Koyanagi; Kristopher J Krohn; Burcu Kucuk Bicer; Nuworza Kugbey; Vivek Kumar; Desmond Kuupiel; Carlo La Vecchia; Deepesh P Lad; Eyasu Alem Lake; Ayenew Molla Lakew; Dharmesh Kumar Lal; Faris Hasan Lami; Qing Lan; Savita Lasrado; Paolo Lauriola; Jeffrey V Lazarus; James Leigh; Cheru Tesema Leshargie; Yu Liao; Miteku Andualem Limenih; Stefan Listl; Alan D Lopez; Platon D Lopukhov; Raimundas Lunevicius; Mohammed Madadin; Sameh Magdeldin; Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek; Azeem Majeed; Afshin Maleki; Reza Malekzadeh; Ali Manafi; Navid Manafi; Wondimu Ayele Manamo; Morteza Mansourian; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani; Saman Maroufizadeh; Santi Martini S Martini; Tivani Phosa Mashamba-Thompson; Benjamin Ballard Massenburg; Motswadi Titus Maswabi; Manu Raj Mathur; Colm McAlinden; Martin McKee; Hailemariam Abiy Alemu Meheretu; Ravi Mehrotra; Varshil Mehta; Toni Meier; Yohannes A Melaku; Gebrekiros Gebremichael Meles; Hagazi Gebre Meles; Addisu Melese; Mulugeta Melku; Peter T N Memiah; Walter Mendoza; Ritesh G Menezes; Shahin Merat; Tuomo J Meretoja; Tomislav Mestrovic; Bartosz Miazgowski; Tomasz Miazgowski; Kebadnew Mulatu M Mihretie; Ted R Miller; Edward J Mills; Seyed Mostafa Mir; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Rashmi Mishra; Babak Moazen; Dara K Mohammad; Karzan Abdulmuhsin Mohammad; Yousef Mohammad; Aso Mohammad Darwesh; Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi; Hiwa Mohammadi; Moslem Mohammadi; Mahdi Mohammadian; Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani; Milad Mohammadoo-Khorasani; Reza Mohammadpourhodki; Ammas Siraj Mohammed; Jemal Abdu Mohammed; Shafiu Mohammed; Farnam Mohebi; Ali H Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Yoshan Moodley; Mahmood Moosazadeh; Maryam Moossavi; Ghobad Moradi; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Farhad Moradpour; Lidia Morawska; Joana Morgado-da-Costa; Naho Morisaki; Shane Douglas Morrison; Abbas Mosapour; Seyyed Meysam Mousavi; Achenef Asmamaw Muche; Oumer Sada S Muhammed; Jonah Musa; Ashraf F Nabhan; Mehdi Naderi; Ahamarshan Jayaraman Nagarajan; Gabriele Nagel; Azin Nahvijou; Gurudatta Naik; Farid Najafi; Luigi Naldi; Hae Sung Nam; Naser Nasiri; Javad Nazari; Ionut Negoi; Subas Neupane; Polly A Newcomb; Haruna Asura Nggada; Josephine W Ngunjiri; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Leila Nikniaz; Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum; Yirga Legesse Nirayo; Molly R Nixon; Chukwudi A Nnaji; Marzieh Nojomi; Shirin Nosratnejad; Malihe Nourollahpour Shiadeh; Mohammed Suleiman Obsa; Richard Ofori-Asenso; Felix Akpojene Ogbo; In-Hwan Oh; Andrew T Olagunju; Tinuke O Olagunju; Mojisola Morenike Oluwasanu; Abidemi E Omonisi; Obinna E Onwujekwe; Anu Mary Oommen; Eyal Oren; Doris D V Ortega-Altamirano; Erika Ota; Stanislav S Otstavnov; Mayowa Ojo Owolabi; Mahesh P A; Jagadish Rao Padubidri; Smita Pakhale; Amir H Pakpour; Adrian Pana; Eun-Kee Park; Hadi Parsian; Tahereh Pashaei; Shanti Patel; Snehal T Patil; Alyssa Pennini; David M Pereira; Cristiano Piccinelli; Julian David Pillay; Majid Pirestani; Farhad Pishgar; Maarten J Postma; Hadi Pourjafar; Farshad Pourmalek; Akram Pourshams; Swayam Prakash; Narayan Prasad; Mostafa Qorbani; Mohammad Rabiee; Navid Rabiee; Amir Radfar; Alireza Rafiei; Fakher Rahim; Mahdi Rahimi; Muhammad Aziz Rahman; Fatemeh Rajati; Saleem M Rana; Samira Raoofi; Goura Kishor Rath; David Laith Rawaf; Salman Rawaf; Robert C Reiner; Andre M N Renzaho; Nima Rezaei; Aziz Rezapour; Ana Isabel Ribeiro; Daniela Ribeiro; Luca Ronfani; Elias Merdassa Roro; Gholamreza Roshandel; Ali Rostami; Ragy Safwat Saad; Parisa Sabbagh; Siamak Sabour; Basema Saddik; Saeid Safiri; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mohammad Reza Salahshoor; Farkhonde Salehi; Hosni Salem; Marwa Rashad Salem; Hamideh Salimzadeh; Joshua A Salomon; Abdallah M Samy; Juan Sanabria; Milena M Santric Milicevic; Benn Sartorius; Arash Sarveazad; Brijesh Sathian; Maheswar Satpathy; Miloje Savic; Monika Sawhney; Mehdi Sayyah; Ione J C Schneider; Ben Schöttker; Mario Sekerija; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Masood Sepehrimanesh; Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Faramarz Shaahmadi; Hosein Shabaninejad; Mohammad Shahbaz; Masood Ali Shaikh; Amir Shamshirian; Morteza Shamsizadeh; Heidar Sharafi; Zeinab Sharafi; Mehdi Sharif; Ali Sharifi; Hamid Sharifi; Rajesh Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Reza Shirkoohi; Sharvari Rahul Shukla; Si Si; Soraya Siabani; Diego Augusto Santos Silva; Dayane Gabriele Alves Silveira; Ambrish Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Solomon Sisay; Freddy Sitas; Eugène Sobngwi; Moslem Soofi; Joan B Soriano; Vasiliki Stathopoulou; Mu'awiyyah Babale Sufiyan; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Takahiro Tabuchi; Ken Takahashi; Omid Reza Tamtaji; Mohammed Rasoul Tarawneh; Segen Gebremeskel Tassew; Parvaneh Taymoori; Arash Tehrani-Banihashemi; Mohamad-Hani Temsah; Omar Temsah; Berhe Etsay Tesfay; Fisaha Haile Tesfay; Manaye Yihune Teshale; Gizachew Assefa Tessema; Subash Thapa; Kenean Getaneh Tlaye; Roman Topor-Madry; Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone; Eugenio Traini; Bach Xuan Tran; Khanh Bao Tran; Afewerki Gebremeskel Tsadik; Irfan Ullah; Olalekan A Uthman; Marco Vacante; Maryam Vaezi; Patricia Varona Pérez; Yousef Veisani; Simone Vidale; Francesco S Violante; Vasily Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Theo Vos; Kia Vosoughi; Giang Thu Vu; Isidora S Vujcic; Henry Wabinga; Tesfahun Mulatu Wachamo; Fasil Shiferaw Wagnew; Yasir Waheed; Fitsum Weldegebreal; Girmay Teklay Weldesamuel; Tissa Wijeratne; Dawit Zewdu Wondafrash; Tewodros Eshete Wonde; Adam Belay Wondmieneh; Hailemariam Mekonnen Workie; Rajaram Yadav; Abbas Yadegar; Ali Yadollahpour; Mehdi Yaseri; Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi; Alex Yeshaneh; Mohammed Ahmed Yimam; Ebrahim M Yimer; Engida Yisma; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Z Younis; Bahman Yousefi; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Chuanhua Yu; Erfan Zabeh; Vesna Zadnik; Telma Zahirian Moghadam; Zoubida Zaidi; Mohammad Zamani; Hamed Zandian; Alireza Zangeneh; Leila Zaki; Kazem Zendehdel; Zerihun Menlkalew Zenebe; Taye Abuhay Zewale; Arash Ziapour; Sanjay Zodpey; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.