| Literature DB >> 35047013 |
Tao Yu1,2, Jian Gao3, Pei-Chun Liao4, Jun-Qing Li2, Wen-Bao Ma5.
Abstract
Acer L. (Sapindaceae) is one of the most diverse and widespread plant genera in the Northern Hemisphere. It comprises 124-156 recognized species, with approximately half being native to Asia. Owing to its numerous morphological features and hybridization, this genus is taxonomically and phylogenetically ranked as one of the most challenging plant taxa. Here, we report the complete chloroplast genome sequences of five Acer species and compare them with those of 43 published Acer species. The chloroplast genomes were 149,103-158,458 bp in length. We conducted a sliding window analysis to find three relatively highly variable regions (psbN-rps14, rpl32-trnL, and ycf1) with a high potential for developing practical genetic markers. A total of 76-103 SSR loci were identified in 48 Acer species. The positive selection analysis of Acer species chloroplast genes showed that two genes (psaI and psbK) were positively selected, implying that light level is a selection pressure for Acer species. Using Bayes empirical Bayes methods, we also identified that 20 cp gene sites have undergone positive selection, which might result from adaptation to specific ecological niches. In phylogenetic analysis, we have reconfirmed that Acer pictum subsp. mono and A. truncatum as sister species. Our results strongly support the sister relationships between sections Platanoidea and Macrantha and between sections Trifoliata and Pentaphylla. Moreover, series Glabra and Arguta are proposed to promote to the section level. The chloroplast genomic resources provided in this study assist taxonomic and phylogenomic resolution within Acer and the Sapindaceae family.Entities:
Keywords: Acer; chloroplast genome; phylogenetics; sequence divergence; structural variation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35047013 PMCID: PMC8762318 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.791628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
General features of the Acer chloroplast genomes compared in this study.
| Species | Total (bp) | GC (%) | LSC (bp) | SSC (bp) | IR (bp) | Accession no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 155,548 | 37.9 | 85,358 | 18,046 | 26,072 | MN864496 |
|
| 156,225 | 37.9 | 86,121 | 18,066 | 26,019 | NC034932 |
|
| 156,911 | 37.9 | 85,315 | 18,094 | 26,751 | NC034744 |
|
| 154,176 | 38.1 | 82,759 | 17,895 | 26,761 | MK479225 |
|
| 157,353 | 37.9 | 85,723 | 18,040 | 26,798 | NC051956 |
|
| 155,212 | 38.0 | 85,448 | 17,724 | 26,020 | MN864497 |
|
| 157,349 | 37.9 | 85,745 | 18,066 | 26,769 | MF179637 |
|
| 158,458 | 37.8 | 86,911 | 18,059 | 26,744 | MK479226 |
|
| 156,227 | 37.9 | 85,928 | 18,121 | 26,079 | NC056164 |
|
| 155,997 | 37.9 | 85,790 | 18,051 | 26,078 | MW067037 |
|
| 157,044 | 37.9 | 85,410 | 18,112 | 26,761 | KU977442 |
|
| 156,535 | 37.9 | 85,166 | 18,077 | 26,646 | NC045527 |
|
| 156,472 | 37.9 | 84,876 | 18,088 | 26,754 | MF787384 |
|
| 156,184 | 38.1 | 85,485 | 18,032 | 26,047 | MN864511 |
|
| 156,373 | 37.9 | 86,034 | 18,211 | 26,064 | MN864498 |
|
| 156,857 | 37.9 | 85,227 | 18,134 | 26,748 | KY511609 |
|
| 156,325 | 37.9 | 86,034 | 18,097 | 26,097 | MW067048 |
|
| 156,905 | 37.9 | 85,323 | 18,084 | 26,749 | MF521832 |
|
| 157,137 | 37.9 | 85,531 | 18,068 | 26,769 | MG751775 |
|
| 157,612 | 38.1 | 86,838 | 18,094 | 26,340 | MK479214 |
|
| 156,234 | 37.9 | 86,043 | 18,059 | 26,066 | MW067055 |
|
| 156,595 | 37.9 | 86,327 | 18,068 | 26,100 | KX098452 |
|
| 156,399 | 37.9 | 86,147 | 18,128 | 26,062 | MN864500 |
|
| 157,197 | 37.8 | 85,655 | 18,086 | 26,728 | KT970611 |
|
| 155,938 | 37.9 | 85,678 | 18,092 | 26,084 | MN841452 |
|
| 156,082 | 37.9 | 85,866 | 18,148 | 26,034 | MN864499 |
|
| 156,225 | 37.8 | 85,823 | 18,232 | 26,085 | MN864502 |
|
| 155,686 | 38.0 | 85,665 | 17,821 | 26,100 | NC056208 |
|
| 157,023 | 37.9 | 85,342 | 18,167 | 26,757 | KY457568 |
|
| 149,103 | 37.5 | 78,768 | 17,474 | 26,366 | MK479215 |
|
| 156,220 | 37.9 | 85,938 | 18,148 | 26,067 | MN864505 |
|
| 156,985 | 37.9 | 85,378 | 18,069 | 26,769 | MG751776 |
|
| 155,586 | 38.0 | 85,313 | 18,139 | 26,076 | MN864506 |
|
| 156,385 | 37.9 | 86,098 | 18,107 | 26,090 | NC051959 |
|
| 157,053 | 37.9 | 85,392 | 18,169 | 26,746 | MW067066 |
|
| 156,790 | 37.9 | 85,127 | 18,115 | 26,774 | MK479212 |
|
| 155,683 | 37.9 | 85,383 | 18,086 | 26,107 | MN864509 |
|
| 155,684 | 37.9 | 85,393 | 18,033 | 26,129 | NC051960 |
|
| 157,121 | 37.9 | 85,558 | 18,119 | 26,722 | KY987160 |
|
| 156,258 | 38.0 | 86,014 | 18,048 | 26,098 | MN864510 |
|
| 156,063 | 37.9 | 85,127 | 18,115 | 26,774 | NC049166 |
|
| 157,023 | 37.9 | 85,371 | 18,160 | 26,746 | NC046488 |
|
| 156,435 | 37.8 | 86,139 | 18,103 | 26,097 | NC056233 |
|
| 154,078 | 38.1 | 83,199 | 17,895 | 26,492 | MK479228 |
|
| 156,262 | 37.9 | 86,019 | 18,073 | 26,085 | MH716034 |
|
| 157,067 | 37.9 | 85,419 | 18,128 | 26,760 | MG012225 |
|
| 155,706 | 38.0 | 86,593 | 18,097 | 25,508 | MN315285 |
|
| 157,088 | 37.9 | 85,483 | 18,069 | 26,768 | MG770234 |
Sequences obtained in this study.
Genes present in the Acer chloroplast genome.
| Group of gene | Genes name |
|---|---|
| Photostsyem I |
|
| Photostsyem II |
|
| Cytochrome b/f complex |
|
| ATP synthase |
|
| NADH dehydrogenase |
|
| RubisCO large subunit |
|
| RNA polymerase |
|
| Ribosomal proteins (SSU) |
|
| Ribosomal proteins (LSU) |
|
| Other gene |
|
| Proteins of unknown function |
|
| ORFs |
|
| Transfer RNAs | 31 tRNAs (six contain a single intron) |
| Ribosomal RNAs |
|
A single asterisk (*) preceding gene names indicate intron-containing genes, and double asterisks (**) preceding gene names indicate two introns in the gene.
FIGURE 1(A) Number of SSRs in the Acer species chloroplast genome. (B) Number of SSRS types of chloroplast genome in 48 Acer species.
FIGURE 2Sliding-window analysis on the cp genomes for Acer species.
Detection of positive selection sites of chloroplast genes in Acer genus.
| Genes | Model | Parameters | 2ΔL | Sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.312 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −3,194.888 | 4.319 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −3,192.729 | 8 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −3,194.917 | 4.405 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −3,192.714 | 13 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.414 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −3,062.544 | 68.257 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −3,028.416 | 12 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −3,062.550 | 68.092 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −3,028.500 | 12 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.195 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −2,767.483 | 19.820 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −2,757.573 | 3 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −2,768.353 | 21.511 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −2,757.597 | 3 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.290 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −1,222.189 | 75.140 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −1,184.619 | 5 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −1,222.474 | 70.978 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −1,186.985 | 6 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.215 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −2,101.206 | 16.580 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −2092.916 | 3 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −2,101.626 | 17.610 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −2092.821 | 3 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.238 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −2,926.687 | 24.031 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −2,914.671 | 5 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −2,926.898 | 24.425 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −2,914.686 | 5 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.398 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −5,574.424 | 97.807 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −5,525.520 | 13 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −5,577.921 | 109.337 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −5,523.252 | 22 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.271 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −942.151 | 11.366 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −936.469 | 4 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −942.381 | 11.793 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −936.484 | 4 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 3.320 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −190.292 | 23.988 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −178.298 | 2 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −192.000 | 27.404 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −178.298 | 2 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.323 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −2,649.421 | 94.692 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −2,602.075 | 8 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −2,649.889 | 95.034 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −2,602.372 | 8 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.425 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −1960.904 | 18.516 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −1951.646 | 9 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −1961.168 | 19.006 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −1951.665 | 9 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.170 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −6,023.244 | 25.005 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −6,010.741 | 9 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −6,023.711 | 25.873 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −6,010.775,053 | 9 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.263 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −4,017.309 | 50.238 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −3,992.190 | 11 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −4,018.563 | 51.186 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −3,992.970 | 11 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.528 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −10233.557 | 465.104 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −10001.005 | 45 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −10233.873 | 461.100 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −10003.323 | 48 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.524 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −856.327 | 14.975 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −848.840 | 4 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −854.884 | 12.935 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −848.417 | 5 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.273 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −746.510 | 7.472 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −742.774 | 1 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −746.512 | 7.466 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −742.779 | 1 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.320 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −603.312 | 16.924 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −594.850 | 3 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −603.357 | 17.004 | ||
| M8 (betaω) | −594.855 | 3 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.632 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −14774.834 | 157.711 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −14695.978 | 42 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −14774.915 | 156.596 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −14696.617 | 61 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.840 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −10754.288 | 44.430 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −10732.073 | 81 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −10754.623 | 45.095 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −10732.076 | 81 | ||
|
| M0 (one ratio) | ω = 0.161 | ||
| M1 (neutral) | −899.336 | 16.519 | ||
| M2 (selection) | −891.077 | 1 | ||
| M7 (beta) | −900.724 | 19.279 | ||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −891.084 | 1 |
FIGURE 3Percentages of the number of sites selected from 73 coding genes in 48 Acer species. A, analysis results of Model M2. B, analysis results of Model M8.
FIGURE 4Phylogenetic tree of 48 Acer species inferred by Bayesian Inference (BI), Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) methods, based on the whole cp genome sequences. The numbers above the branches are the posterior probabilities of BI and bootstrap values of ML and MP. Asterisks represent nodes with maximal support values in all methods. Each Section was marked in the same colour.