| Literature DB >> 35046908 |
Jens Andre Hammerl1, Andrea Barac1, Anja Bienert1, Aslihan Demir1, Niklas Drüke1, Claudia Jäckel1, Nina Matthies1, Jin Woo Jun2, Mikael Skurnik3,4, Juliane Ulrich1, Stefan Hertwig1.
Abstract
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is an important animal pathogen, particularly for birds, rodents, and monkeys, which is also able to infect humans. Indeed, an increasing number of reports have been published on zoo animals that were killed by this species. One option to treat diseased animals is the application of strictly lytic (virulent) phages. However, thus far relatively few phages infecting Y. pseudotuberculosis have been isolated and characterized. To determine the prevalence of Y. pseudotuberculosis phages in zoo animals, fecal samples of birds and some primates, maras, and peccaries kept in the Tierpark Berlin were analyzed. Seventeen out of 74 samples taken in 2013 and 2017 contained virulent phages. The isolated phages were analyzed in detail and could be allocated to three groups. The first group is composed of 10 T4-like phages (PYps2T taxon group: Myoviridae; Tevenvirinae; Tequatrovirus), the second group (PYps23T taxon group: Chaseviridae; Carltongylesvirus; Escherichia virus ST32) consists of five phages encoding a podovirus-like RNA polymerase that is related to an uncommon genus of myoviruses (e.g., Escherichia coli phage phiEcoM-GJ1), while the third group is comprised of two podoviruses (PYps50T taxon group: Autographiviridae; Studiervirinae; Berlinvirus) which are closely related to T7. The host range of the isolated phages differed significantly. Between 5.5 and 86.7% of 128 Y. pseudotuberculosis strains belonging to 20 serotypes were lysed by each phage. All phages were additionally able to lyse Y. enterocolitica B4/O:3 strains, when incubated at 37°C. Some phages also infected Y. pestis strains and even strains belonging to other genera of Enterobacteriaceae. A cocktail containing two of these phages would be able to lyse almost 93% of the tested Y. pseudotuberculosis strains. The study indicates that Y. pseudotuberculosis phages exhibiting a broad-host range can be isolated quite easily from zoo animals, particularly birds.Entities:
Keywords: Yersinia; Yersinia pseudotuberculosis; diversity; genome; phage; zoo animals
Year: 2022 PMID: 35046908 PMCID: PMC8762354 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.634289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Host range of the phages on Yersinia.
| Phage group | PYps2T | PYps23T | PYps50T | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYps2T | PYps5T | PYps10T | PYps11T | PYps14T | PYps15T | PYps32T | PYps35T | PYps47T | PYps55T | PYps3T | PYps4T | PYps16T | PYps16N | PYps23T | PYps49T | PYps50T | |
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| O:1a ( | 6 | 8 | 25 | 17 | 27 | 26 | 27 | 26 | 21 | 24 | – | – | – | – | – | 27 | 27 |
| O:1b ( | 5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 14 |
| O:1 | 2 | – | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | 3 |
| O:2a ( | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | 5 |
| O:2b ( | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| O:2c ( | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| O:3 ( | 1 | – | 1 | – | 14 | 15 | 14 | 17 | 10 | 15 | – | – | – | – | – | 17 | 18 |
| O:4a ( | 1 | – | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | – | – | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| O:4b ( | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| O:4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| O:5a ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| O:5b ( | 1 | – | 1 | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| O:6 ( | – | – | – | – | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| O:7 ( | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| O:8 ( | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| O:9 ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| O:10 ( | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | 3 | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| O:11 ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| O:12 ( | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | 2 | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| O:13 ( | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| O:14 ( | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| O:15 ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 2 |
| NT ( | – | – | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 8 | |||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| O:4a ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| O:15 ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| O:1c ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| O:6 ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| O:9 ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| O:11 ( | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| O:12 ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
The subtypes of these strains were not determined.
Lysis of other Enterobacteriaceae.
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYps2T | PYps5T | PYps10T | PYps11T | PYps14T | PYps15T | PYps32T | PYps35T | PYps47T | PYps55T | PYps3T | PYps4T | PYps16T | PYps16N | PYps23T | PYps49T | PYps50T | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | |
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |
| – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | – | |
| 1 | – | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | 2 | 1 | |
| 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 2 | |
Origin of the phages analyzed in this study.
| Phage ID | Morphology (taxonomic classification) | Lysed species | Source of the fecal sample | Sample no. | Year of sampling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYps2T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Rufous hawk owl ( | 2013–02 | 2013 | |
| PYps3T | Myovirus (Carltongylesvirus) | Turkmenian eagle-owl ( | 2013–03 | 2013 | |
| PYps4T | Myovirus (Carltongylesvirus) | Black-headed ibis ( | 2013–04 | 2013 | |
| PYps5T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Turkey vulture ( | 2013–05 | 2013 | |
| PYps10T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Morepork ( | 2013–10 | 2013 | |
| PYps11T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | White-faced scops owl ( | 2013–11 | 2013 | |
| PYps16T | Myovirus (Carltongylesvirus) | Snow owl ( | 2013–16 | 2013 | |
| PYps14T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Mixed aviary | 2017–14 | 2017 | |
| PYps15T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Mixed aviary | 2017–15 | 2017 | |
| PYps16N | Myovirus (Carltongylesvirus) | Mixed aviary | 2017–16 | 2017 | |
| PYps23T | Myovirus (Carltongylesvirus) | Cebus capuchin monkey ( | 2017–23 | 2017 | |
| PYps32T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Kennicotti owl/Western screech owl ( | 2017–32 | 2017 | |
| PYps35T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Great horned owl ( | 2017–35 | 2017 | |
| PYps47T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Mixed aviary | 2017–47 | 2017 | |
| PYps49T | Podovirus (Berlinvirus) | Mixed aviary | 2017–49 | 2017 | |
| PYps50T | Podovirus (Berlinvirus) | Mixed aviary | 2017–50 | 2017 | |
| PYps55T | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Mixed aviary | 2017–55 | 2017 |
Further information on all investigated samples is given in Supplementary Table S1.
Figure 1Morphology and plaque formation of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis phages. (A) PYps2T group, (B) PYps23T group, and (C) PYps50T group.
Figure 2Dot plot analyses of the three Y. pseudotuberculosis type phages with closely related phages. (A) PYps2T, (B) PYps23T, and (C) PYps50T. Dot plot analyses were conducted using Accelrys DS Gene (version 2.5; Accelrys Inc.) with the following settings: minimum sequence identity: 65%; window size: 25; and hash value: 6.
Figure 3Gene maps of the Y. pseudotuberculosis type phages. (A) PYps2T, (B) PYps23T, and (C) PYps50T. Predicted functions of gene products are indicated by different colors.
Morphological and genomic properties of the isolated Y. pseudotuberculosis phages.
| Phage group | PYps2T | PYps23T | PYps50T | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYps2T | PYps5T | PYps10T | PYps11T | PYps14T | PYps15T | PYps32T | PYps35T | PYps47 | PYps55T | PYps3T | PYps4T | PYps16T | PYps16N | PYps23T | PYps50T | PYps49T | |
| Morphology (taxonomic classification) | Myovirus (Tequatrovirus) | Myovirus (Carltongylesvirus) | Podovirus (Berlinvirus) | ||||||||||||||
| Genome size | 169,486 bp | 169,375 bp | 169,493 bp | 169,490 bp | 166,935 bp | 166,925 bp | 165,733 bp | 166,974 bp | 165,778 bp | 167,710 bp | 52,854 bp | 52,855 bp | 52,855 bp | 52,376 bp | 54,869 bp | 39,655 bp | 39,459 bp |
| GC content | 35.4% | 35.4% | 35.4% | 35.4% | 35.4% | 35.4% | 35.5% | 35.4% | 35.5% | 35.4% | 43.8% | 43.8% | 43.8% | 44.0% | 43.9% | 48.7% | 48.8% |
| Genes (no.) | 269 | 267 | 270 | 268 | 267 | 267 | 263 | 264 | 262 | 267 | 85 | 86 | 85 | 84 | 83 | 44 | 45 |
| tRNA genes (no.) | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Arg | Arg | Arg | Arg | Arg | Arg | Arg | Arg | Arg | Arg | – | – | – | Arg | Arg | – | – | |
| Asn | His | Asn | Asn | Asn | Asn | Asn | Asn | Asn | Asn | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Tyr | Asn | Tyr | Tyr | Tyr | Tyr | Tyr | Tyr | Tyr | Tyr | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Met | Tyr | Met | Met | Met | Met | Met | Met | Met | Met | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Thr | Met | Thr | Thr | Thr | Thr | Thr | Thr | Thr | Thr | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Ser | Ser | Ser | Ser | Ser | Ser | Ser | Ser | Ser | Ser | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Pro | Pro | Pro | Pro | Pro | Pro | Pro | Pro | Pro | Pro | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Gly | Gly | Gly | Gly | Gly | Gly | Gly | Gly | Gly | Gly | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Leu | Leu | Leu | Leu | Leu | Leu | Leu | Leu | Leu | Leu | – | – | – | Leu | Leu | – | – | |
| Gln | – | Gln | Gln | Gln | Gln | Gln | Gln | Gln | Gln | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Transcription terminators (no.) | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 82 | 82 | 91 | 91 | 91 | 84 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 17 | 22 | 8 | 8 |
| Genome end structure | Circular permuted genome | Long terminal direct repeats | Short terminal direct repeats | ||||||||||||||
| Accession number | MT828551 | MT828552 | MT828553 | MT515751 | MT526905 | MT515752 | MT515753 | MT515754 | MT515755 | MT515756 | MW147599 | MW147600 | MW147602 | MW147601 | MW147598 | MT515757 | MW147603 |
The structure of the terminal ends was not determined.
Figure 4Alignment of the PYps2T group tail fiber adhesins (gp38 in T4).
Figure 5The PYps23T genome contains long terminal direct repeats. (A) MbiI and NdeI restriction patterns of the phage DNA obtained by agarose gel electrophoresis and by in silico analysis. Fragments that were present only in the gel or in the in silico analysis are boxed. In silico restriction pattern predictions of PYps23T were obtained using NEBcutter v2.0 (Vincze et al., 2003). Shown are patterns of the PYps23T genome without and with terminal repeats of 2.3 kb. M, Lambda Eco32I marker (fragment sizes are given). (B). Determination of the start and end of the direct repeat. PED, PCR End Determination primer; DS, Direct Sequencing primer. See the text for details.
Figure 6Dot plot of the tail fiber proteins of PYps50T and Yep-phi. Dot plot analyses were conducted using Accelrys DS Gene (version 2.5; Accelrys Inc.) with the following settings: minimum sequence identity: 65%; window size: 15; and hash value: 2.