| Literature DB >> 35043168 |
Jing Tao1,2, Shikai Li2, Qian Wang2, Yi Yuan2, Jiqiong Ma3, Minghui Xu3, Yi Yang3, Cui Zhang4, Lijuan Chen1, Yiding Sun3.
Abstract
Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) belongs to the family Brassicaceae. The Yunnan red radish variety contains fairly relatively large amounts of anthocyanins, making them important raw materials for producing edible red pigment. However, the genetic mechanism underlying this pigmentation has not been fully characterized. Herein, the radish inbred line YAAS-WR1 (white root-skin and white root-flesh) was crossed with the inbred line YAAS-RR1 (red root-skin and red root-flesh) to produce F1, F2, BC1P1, and BC1P2 populations. Genetic analyses revealed that the pigmented/non-pigmented (PiN) and purple/red (PR) traits were controlled by two genetic loci. The F2 population and the specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) technique were used to construct a high-density genetic map (1230.16 cM), which contained 4032 markers distributed in nine linkage groups, with a mean distance between markers of 0.31 cM. Additionally, two QTL (QAC1 and QAC2) considerably affecting radish pigmentation were detected. A bioinformatics analysis of the QAC1 region identified 58 predicted protein-coding genes. Of these genes, RsF3'H, which is related to anthocyanin biosynthesis, was revealed as a likely candidate gene responsible for the PR trait. The results were further verified by analyzing gene structure and expression. Regarding QAC2, RsMYB1.3 was determined to be a likely candidate gene important for the PiN trait, with a 4-bp insertion in the first exon that introduced a premature termination codon in the YAAS-WR1 sequence. Assays demonstrated that RsMYB1.3 interacted with RsTT8 and activates RsTT8 and RsUFGT expression. These findings may help clarify the complex regulatory mechanism underlying radish anthocyanin synthesis. Furthermore, this study's results may be relevant for the molecular breeding of radish to improve the anthocyanin content and appearance of the taproots.Entities:
Keywords: Anthocyanins; Candidate gene; Genetic map; Radish; SLAF-seq
Year: 2022 PMID: 35043168 PMCID: PMC8829420 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhab031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hortic Res ISSN: 2052-7276 Impact factor: 7.291
Figure 1(a) Phenotypes of the parental inbred lines and the F2 individuals. (a, a) Maternal line YAAS-RR1. (a, b) Paternal line YAAS-WR1. (a, d–a, l) Phenotypes of the F2 individuals with diverse coloration. (b) Frequency distribution of the pigmented-skin trait among F2 individuals. (c) Frequency distribution of the pigmented-flesh trait among F2 individuals.
Segregation of plant colors in six populations
| Material | Generation | Observed (PP:RP:NP) | Expected (PP:RP:NP) | χ2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WR1 | P2 | 0:0:20 | 0:0:1 | ||
| RR1 | P1 | 0:20:0 | 0:1:0 | ||
| RR1 × WR1 | F1 | 20:0:0 | 1:0:0 | ||
| (RR1 × WR1) × WR1 | BC1P2 | 25:0:25 | 1:0:1 | 0.02 | 0.8875 |
| (RR1 × WR1) × RR1 | BC1P1 | 33:49:0 | 1:1:0 | 2.7439 | 0.0976 |
| RR1 × WR1 Self | F2 | 197:74:87 | 9:3:4 | 0.8507 | 0.6535 |
Figure 2Radish genetic map. The x-axis presents the linkage group and the y-axis presents the genetic distance.
Basic information regarding the red radish genetic map
| Linkage group ID | Total markers | Total distance (cM) | Average distance (cM) | Max. gap (cM) | Gap <5 cM (%) | Total segregation distortion | Singletons (%) | Missing (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG01 | 404 | 143.72 | 0.36 | 3.26 | 100.00 | 63 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| LG02 | 446 | 95.47 | 0.21 | 2.05 | 100.00 | 3 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| LG03 | 212 | 104.58 | 0.50 | 4.46 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| LG04 | 562 | 148.54 | 0.26 | 3.56 | 100.00 | 7 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| LG05 | 656 | 183.98 | 0.28 | 5.22 | 99.85 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| LG06 | 869 | 171.91 | 0.20 | 2.55 | 100.00 | 18 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| LG07 | 317 | 119.31 | 0.38 | 5.52 | 99.68 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.21 |
| LG08 | 254 | 115.94 | 0.46 | 3.91 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.41 |
| LG09 | 312 | 146.71 | 0.47 | 3.91 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.08 | 0.14 |
| Total | 4032 | 1230.16 | 0.31 | 5.52 | 99.95 | 91 |
Figure 3Locations of color-type and root skin anthocyanin content trait on genetic linkage map. (a1) LOD scores for the variation in the color-type trait along nine LGs. (a2) Phenotypic contribution rate along the nine linkage groups for variation of the color-type trait. (a3) LOD scores for the variation in the color-type trait along the seventh LG. (b1) LOD scores for variation in the anthocyanin content trait of root skin along nine LGs. (b2) Phenotypic contribution rate along the nine LGs for the variation in the anthocyanin content trait of root skin. (b3) LOD scores for variation in the anthocyanin content trait of root skin along the seventh LG. In a1, a3, b1 and b3, the horizontal ordinate presents the order of the markers in the linkage group; the vertical ordinate presents the LOD values; curves in the plot indicate the genetic coordinate and the LOD score of the detected QTL; the gray line indicates the threshold; the area above the threshold is the associated QTL area. In a2 and b2, the horizontal ordinate presents the order of the markers in the linkage group; the vertical ordinate presents the contribution rate; ‘a’ (the blue curve) indicates the LOD value corresponding to the marker; ‘d’, (the red curve) indicates the phenotypic contribution rate corresponding to the marker; the gray line indicates the threshold.
Figure 4Analysis of RsF3′H as a candidate gene. (a) Expression patterns of RsF3′H based on semiquantitative PCR analysis of the two parental lines. (b) Alignment of the second exon of RsF3′H sequences from white and red radishes. LOC108814778 is the RsF3′H allele in the reference genome. ‘.’ indicates a missing base. The premature termination codon is indicated with a red line. (c) Genotypes of the F2 individuals for the PCR markers. Numbers represent the different F2 individuals used for constructing the genetic map.
Figure 5Analysis of RsMYB1.3 as a candidate gene. (a) Expression patterns of RsMYB1.3 based on the semiquantitative PCR analysis of the two parental lines. (b) Alignment of the RsMYB1.3 sequences from YAAS-RR1 and YAAS-WR1. LOC108814812 is the RsMYB1.3 allele in the reference genome. ‘.’ represents a missing base. The premature termination codon is indicated with a red line. (c) Genotypes of the F2 individuals for the PCR markers. Numbers represent the different F2 individuals used for constructing the genetic map “a” in the figure above indicates the use of RsMYB1.3-a F/R primer pair and “b” in the figure below indicates the use of RsMYB1.3-b F/R primer pair.
Figure 6RsMYB1.3 promotes the expression of RsTT8 and RsUFGT and interacts with RsTT8. (a) Relative expressions of RsMYB1.3, RsTT8 and RsUFGT in the flesh of taproots with different anthocyanin contents as determined by qPCR analysis. Numbers represent the different F2 individuals used to construct the genetic population. (b) Schematic of the effector/reporter constructs for dual-luciferase assays. (c) In vivo interaction between RsMYB1.3 and the RsTT8 and RsUFGT promoters according to dual-luciferase assays. (d) Construct details for the Y1H assay. (e) Y1H assay results for the binding between RsMYB1.3 and anthocyanin synthesis-related gene promoters (RsUFGT and RsTT8); the empty pGADT7 vector was used as the negative control. (f) Details of the RsTT8 constructs used for Y2H assays. (g) Y2H assay results for binding between RsMYB1.3 and RsTT8 fragments.