Jonathan Elmer1, Chang Liu2, Matthew Pease3, Dooman Arefan4, Patrick J Coppler5, Katharyn L Flickinger5, Joseph M Mettenburg4, Maria E Baldwin6, Niravkumar Barot7, Shandong Wu8. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Neurology Division, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: elmerjp@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 7. Neurology Division, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 8. Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend use of computerized tomography (CT) and electroencephalography (EEG) in post-arrest prognostication. Strong associations between CT and EEG might obviate the need to acquire both modalities. We quantified these associations via deep learning. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study including comatose patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest. We extracted brain CT DICOMs, resized and registered each to a standard anatomical atlas, performed skull stripping and windowed images to optimize contrast of the gray-white junction. We classified initial EEG as generalized suppression, other highly pathological findings or benign activity. We extracted clinical information available on presentation from our prospective registry. We trained three machine learning (ML) models to predict EEG from clinical covariates. We used three state-of-the-art approaches to build multi-headed deep learning models using similar model architectures. Finally, we combined the best performing clinical and imaging models. We evaluated discrimination in test sets. RESULTS: We included 500 patients, of whom 218 (44%) had benign EEG findings, 135 (27%) showed generalized suppression and 147 (29%) had other highly pathological findings that were most commonly (93%) burst suppression with identical bursts. Clinical ML models had moderate discrimination (test set AUCs 0.73-0.80). Image-based deep learning performed worse (test set AUCs 0.51-0.69), particularly discriminating benign from highly pathological findings. Adding image-based deep learning to clinical models improved prediction of generalized suppression due to accurate detection of severe cerebral edema. DISCUSSION: CT and EEG provide complementary information about post-arrest brain injury. Our results do not support selective acquisition of only one of these modalities, except in the most severely injured patients.
INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend use of computerized tomography (CT) and electroencephalography (EEG) in post-arrest prognostication. Strong associations between CT and EEG might obviate the need to acquire both modalities. We quantified these associations via deep learning. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study including comatose patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest. We extracted brain CT DICOMs, resized and registered each to a standard anatomical atlas, performed skull stripping and windowed images to optimize contrast of the gray-white junction. We classified initial EEG as generalized suppression, other highly pathological findings or benign activity. We extracted clinical information available on presentation from our prospective registry. We trained three machine learning (ML) models to predict EEG from clinical covariates. We used three state-of-the-art approaches to build multi-headed deep learning models using similar model architectures. Finally, we combined the best performing clinical and imaging models. We evaluated discrimination in test sets. RESULTS: We included 500 patients, of whom 218 (44%) had benign EEG findings, 135 (27%) showed generalized suppression and 147 (29%) had other highly pathological findings that were most commonly (93%) burst suppression with identical bursts. Clinical ML models had moderate discrimination (test set AUCs 0.73-0.80). Image-based deep learning performed worse (test set AUCs 0.51-0.69), particularly discriminating benign from highly pathological findings. Adding image-based deep learning to clinical models improved prediction of generalized suppression due to accurate detection of severe cerebral edema. DISCUSSION: CT and EEG provide complementary information about post-arrest brain injury. Our results do not support selective acquisition of only one of these modalities, except in the most severely injured patients.
Authors: Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans; Rikkert Hindriks; Jeannette Hofmeijer; Michel J A M van Putten Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Jonathan Elmer; Jon C Rittenberger; John Faro; Bradley J Molyneaux; Alexandra Popescu; Clifton W Callaway; Maria Baldwin Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Patrick J Coppler; Jonathan Elmer; Luis Calderon; Alexa Sabedra; Ankur A Doshi; Clifton W Callaway; Jon C Rittenberger; Cameron Dezfulian Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Clifton W Callaway; Michael W Donnino; Ericka L Fink; Romergryko G Geocadin; Eyal Golan; Karl B Kern; Marion Leary; William J Meurer; Mary Ann Peberdy; Trevonne M Thompson; Janice L Zimmerman Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Niel Chen; Clifton W Callaway; Francis X Guyette; Jon C Rittenberger; Ankur A Doshi; Cameron Dezfulian; Jonathan Elmer Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Marleen C Cloostermans; Fokke B van Meulen; Carin J Eertman; Harold W Hom; Michel J A M van Putten Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: H M Keijzer; C W E Hoedemaekers; F J A Meijer; B A R Tonino; C J M Klijn; J Hofmeijer Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jonathan Elmer; Patrick J Coppler; Pawan Solanki; M Brandon Westover; Aaron F Struck; Maria E Baldwin; Michael C Kurz; Clifton W Callaway Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-04-01