Literature DB >> 35041875

Deep learning of early brain imaging to predict post-arrest electroencephalography.

Jonathan Elmer1, Chang Liu2, Matthew Pease3, Dooman Arefan4, Patrick J Coppler5, Katharyn L Flickinger5, Joseph M Mettenburg4, Maria E Baldwin6, Niravkumar Barot7, Shandong Wu8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend use of computerized tomography (CT) and electroencephalography (EEG) in post-arrest prognostication. Strong associations between CT and EEG might obviate the need to acquire both modalities. We quantified these associations via deep learning.
METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study including comatose patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest. We extracted brain CT DICOMs, resized and registered each to a standard anatomical atlas, performed skull stripping and windowed images to optimize contrast of the gray-white junction. We classified initial EEG as generalized suppression, other highly pathological findings or benign activity. We extracted clinical information available on presentation from our prospective registry. We trained three machine learning (ML) models to predict EEG from clinical covariates. We used three state-of-the-art approaches to build multi-headed deep learning models using similar model architectures. Finally, we combined the best performing clinical and imaging models. We evaluated discrimination in test sets.
RESULTS: We included 500 patients, of whom 218 (44%) had benign EEG findings, 135 (27%) showed generalized suppression and 147 (29%) had other highly pathological findings that were most commonly (93%) burst suppression with identical bursts. Clinical ML models had moderate discrimination (test set AUCs 0.73-0.80). Image-based deep learning performed worse (test set AUCs 0.51-0.69), particularly discriminating benign from highly pathological findings. Adding image-based deep learning to clinical models improved prediction of generalized suppression due to accurate detection of severe cerebral edema. DISCUSSION: CT and EEG provide complementary information about post-arrest brain injury. Our results do not support selective acquisition of only one of these modalities, except in the most severely injured patients.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain injury; CT imaging; Cardiac arrest; Electroencephalography; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35041875      PMCID: PMC8923981          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  22 in total

1.  Generalized periodic discharges after acute cerebral ischemia: reflection of selective synaptic failure?

Authors:  Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans; Rikkert Hindriks; Jeannette Hofmeijer; Michel J A M van Putten
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Clinically distinct electroencephalographic phenotypes of early myoclonus after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Jon C Rittenberger; John Faro; Bradley J Molyneaux; Alexandra Popescu; Clifton W Callaway; Maria Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Validation of the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category illness severity score.

Authors:  Patrick J Coppler; Jonathan Elmer; Luis Calderon; Alexa Sabedra; Ankur A Doshi; Clifton W Callaway; Jon C Rittenberger; Cameron Dezfulian
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 4.  Part 8: Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Clifton W Callaway; Michael W Donnino; Ericka L Fink; Romergryko G Geocadin; Eyal Golan; Karl B Kern; Marion Leary; William J Meurer; Mary Ann Peberdy; Trevonne M Thompson; Janice L Zimmerman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Arrest etiology among patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Niel Chen; Clifton W Callaway; Francis X Guyette; Jon C Rittenberger; Ankur A Doshi; Cameron Dezfulian; Jonathan Elmer
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Machine learning for medical images analysis.

Authors:  A Criminisi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Continuous electroencephalography monitoring for early prediction of neurological outcome in postanoxic patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marleen C Cloostermans; Fokke B van Meulen; Carin J Eertman; Harold W Hom; Michel J A M van Putten
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

Authors:  Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu; Heung-Il Suk
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 9.  Brain imaging in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: Pathophysiological correlates and prognostic properties.

Authors:  H M Keijzer; C W E Hoedemaekers; F J A Meijer; B A R Tonino; C J M Klijn; J Hofmeijer
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Sensitivity of Continuous Electroencephalography to Detect Ictal Activity After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Patrick J Coppler; Pawan Solanki; M Brandon Westover; Aaron F Struck; Maria E Baldwin; Michael C Kurz; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.