Literature DB >> 35041663

Complete sequences of epidermin and nukacin encoding plasmids from oral-derived Staphylococcus epidermidis and their antibacterial activity.

Kenta Nakazono1, Mi Nguyen-Tra Le2,3, Miki Kawada-Matsuo2,3, Noy Kimheang2, Junzo Hisatsune3,4, Yuichi Oogai5, Masanobu Nakata5, Norifumi Nakamura1, Motoyuki Sugai3,4, Hitoshi Komatsuzawa2,3.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus epidermidis is a commensal bacterium in humans. To persist in the bacterial flora of the host, some bacteria produce antibacterial factors such as the antimicrobial peptides known as bacteriocins. In this study, we tried to isolate bacteriocin-producing S. epidermidis strains. Among 150 S. epidermidis isolates from the oral cavities of 287 volunteers, we detected two bacteriocin-producing strains, KSE56 and KSE650. Complete genome sequences of the two strains confirmed that they carried the epidermin-harboring plasmid pEpi56 and the nukacin IVK45-like-harboring plasmid pNuk650. The amino acid sequence of epidermin from KSE56 was identical to the previously reported sequence, but the epidermin synthesis-related genes were partially different. The prepeptide amino acid sequences of nukacin KSE650 and nukacin IVK45 showed one mismatch, but both mature peptides were entirely similar. pNuk650 was larger and had an additional seven ORFs compared to pIVK45. We then investigated the antibacterial activity of the two strains against several skin and oral bacteria and found their different activity patterns. In conclusion, we report the complete sequences of 2 plasmids coding for bacteriocins from S. epidermidis, which were partially different from those previously reported. Furthermore, this is the first report to show the complete sequence of an epidermin-carrying plasmid, pEpi56.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35041663      PMCID: PMC8765612          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Staphylococci are classified into two groups, Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase -negative staphylococci (CoNS) due to their clinical importance. CoNS are abundant colonizers on the skin and are considered to contribute to the maintenance of skin integrity and homeostasis [1-3]. CoNS assist in immune activity to prevent pathogen colonization by inducing antimicrobial peptides from the epithelium, by direct production of antibacterial factors such as phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) and bacteriocins [4-6]. Therefore, the colonization of CoNS provides several benefits to the host. However, CoNS are commonly isolated in clinical cultures and considered to be major nosocomial pathogens in humans [7, 8]. CoNS are often isolated from blood and indwelling medical implants such as intravascular catheters and urinary catheters, leading to opportunistic infectious diseases. In addition, most clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis carry the genes encoding for antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation, which significantly challenge current antibiotic therapy [9, 10]. In the oral cavity, oral bacterial flora is composed of a great diversity of bacterial species. Many oral indigenous bacteria, including oral streptococci, are known to produce antimicrobial factors such as bacteriocins and hydrogen peroxide [11-15]. Bacteriocins exhibit a wide range of antimicrobial activity against the bacterial species that make up the oral flora [16]. Therefore, bacteriocins are thought to be involved in the exclusion and symbiosis of other bacteria in the oral cavity. S. epidermidis is also found in oral cavity [17, 18]. Some S. epidermidis are known to produce antimicrobial peptides known as bacteriocins, including epidermin [19-21], Pep5 [21-23], epilancin K7 [21, 24], epilancin 15X [25, 26], epicidin 280 [27] and Nukacin IVK-45 [28]. These bacteriocins are known to be lantibiotics containing specific amino acids such as lanthionine, β-methyllanthionine, and dehydrated amino acids [11-13]. However, there are no reports about the bacteriocin produced by S. epidermidis isolated from the oral cavity. So far, there have been many reports on bacteriocins produced by oral isolates of streptococcal species [11–13, 16] but very few reports on other oral bacterial species. To understand the meaning of bacteriocins for bacterial flora formation, more information about bacteriocins produced by many oral bacterial species is required. In this study, we focused on the bacteriocins of oral-derived S. epidermidis to understand the antibacterial activity against oral and skin bacteria. We examined 150 S. epidermidis strains isolated from the oral cavity and investigated their bacteriocin-producing activity. As a result, we found two strains that produced epidermin and nukacin IVK45. We performed the complete-genome analysis of these two strains and identified the plasmids harboring the epidermin or nukacin IVK45-like bacteriocin gene clusters. The nucleotide sequences of these plasmids were not entirely similar to the previously reported sequences. Additionally, we evaluated the antibacterial activity of these two bacteriocins against the skin and oral commensal bacteria.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

S. epidermidis clinical isolates were grown in trypticase soy broth (TSB) (Becton, Dickinson and Company [BD], Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 37°C. The Staphylococcus aureus MW2 strain and braRS-inactivated mutant were obtained previously [29]. Other bacteria used in this study are listed in Table 1. Staphylococcal strains and Micrococcus luteus were grown in TSB at 37°C and 30°C, respectively. Streptococcal strains were grown in TSB at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cutibacterium acnes was grown on sheep blood agar at 37°C anaerobically. Corynebacterium and Rothia mucilanginosa were grown at 37°C in R medium and BHI (BD) aerobically, respectively. The composition of R medium is as follows: 1g of bacto peptone (BD), 0.5g of yeast extract (BD), 0.5g of malt extract (BD), 0.5g of casamino acids (BD), 0.2g of beef extract (BD), 0.2g of glycerol, 5mg of Tween 80, 0.1g of MgSO4 in 100 ml distilled water. When necessary, tetracycline (5 μg/ml) was added to the medium.
Table 1

Strains used in this study.

StrainsCharacterorigin
Staphylococcus epidermidis
KSE1Wild typeThis study
KSE3Wild typeThis study
KSE56Wild typeThis study
KSE650Wild typeThis study
KSE56-KSE56 plasmid deletedThis study
KSE650-KSE650 plasmid deletedThis study
Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1Wild type
Staphylococcus hominis JCM31912Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Staphylococcus haemolyticus JCM2416Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Staphylococcus capitis subsp. capitis JCM2420Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Staphylococcus simulans JCM2424Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Cutibacterium acnes JCM6425Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Corynebacterium accolens JCM8331Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum JCM1320Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Rothia mucilaginosa JCM10910Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Micrococcus luteus JCM1464Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Streptococcus mutans UA159Wild type[30]
Streptococcus sanguinis GTC217Wild typeGifu University
Streptococcus salivarius GTC215Wild typeGifu University
Streptococcus gordonii JCM12995Wild typeRiken BRC 1
Staphylococcus aureus
COLWild type[31]
RN4220NCTS8325 derivative[32]
MW2clinical strain, methicillin-resistant (mecA+)[33]
ΔTCS16braRS inactivation in MW2, Tcr2[29]

1. Japan Collection of Microorganisms.

2. Tetracycline resistance.

1. Japan Collection of Microorganisms. 2. Tetracycline resistance.

Isolation of Staphylococcus epidermidis from the oral cavity

S. epidermidis strains were isolated from the oral cavities of 287 volunteers. Saliva collected from the oral cavity was plated on No.110 medium (Eiken Chemical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and incubated for 2 days at 37°C. The strains were picked from a single white colony on the agar and further investigated by PCR with specific primers for S. epidermidis (forward primer: GGCAAATTTGTGGGTCAAGA, reverse primer: TGGCTAATGGTTTGTCACCA). Isolated S. epidermidis strains were replated on TSB containing 2% agar (TSA) medium. The isolated strains were then replated again on TSA to pick up a single colony and finally, S. epidermidis confirmed by PCR was used in this study. Clinical isolates were designated as KSE strains. Saliva collection and S. epidermidis isolation were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences (No. 701) and the Ethical Committee for Epidemiology of Hiroshima University (E-1998). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations.

Screening of bacteriocin-producing S. epidermidis

To investigate bacteriocin production among S. epidermidis strains, we performed a direct assay using S. aureus MW2 braRS knockout mutant as an indicator strain because this mutant showed increased susceptibility to several bacteriocins [34]. Overnight cultures of S. epidermidis strains were spotted on a TSA plate and cultured at 37°C for 24 h. Then, 3.5 ml of prewarmed half-strength TSB soft agar (1%) containing braRS knockout mutant cells (107 cells/ml) were poured over the TSA plate. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The strains which showed the growth inhibition zones surrounding S. epidermidis strain were picked up. The strains were reconfirmed for bacteriocin production by the direct assay again.

Complete genome sequences of bacteriocin-producing S. epidermidis strains

To perform whole-genome sequencing of S. epidermidis strains, DNA was extracted from each strain. S. epidermidis cells grown overnight in 5 ml TSB were collected and then suspended in 0.5 ml of CS buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA) containing lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (final concentration: 50 μg/ml) and RNase (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) (final: 20 μg/ml). After incubation at 37°C for 1 h, proteinase K (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) (final: 150 μg/ml) and SDS (final 1%) were added, followed by incubation at 55°C for 5 h. After treatment with phenol followed by phenol-chloroform, DNA was precipitated by ethanol. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of S. epidermidis strains was performed using the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform, followed by annotation with Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) version 2.0 [35]. After confirming the presence of bacteriocin genes using WGS, long-read sequencing by MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK) was carried out to determine the complete sequences of the chromosomes and plasmids of these strains. Hybrid assembly of Illumina short reads and MinION long reads was performed with Unicycler v0.4.8. The complete sequences of plasmids harboring bacteriocin genes were selected, including epidermin-carrying plasmid pEpi56 and nukacin-carrying plasmid pNuk650. Each plasmid was compared with publicly available plasmids or gene clusters, including the epiY’-epiP gene cluster (X62386), epiG-epiT’’ gene cluster (U77778), and pIVK45 (accession number KP702950).

Accession numbers

The complete plasmids carrying epidermin (pEpi56) and nukacin (pNuk650) have been deposited in the NCBI database under accession numbers OK031036 and OK031035, respectively.

Identification of epidermin and nukacin KSE650 produced by S. epidermidis

To identify the bacteriocin, we purified the bacteriocin from two S. epidermidis strains. Overnight cultures (500 ml) of S. epidermidis KSE56 and KSE650 were centrifuged at 4,000 x g for 15 min. Macro-Prep cationic resin (1.5 ml) (Bio rad, USA) was added to the supernatant and stirred for 12 h. The resin was collected into an open column, then washed three times with 10 ml of 25 mM ammonium acetate (pH 7.5). To elute the bacteriocin, the resin was treated with 500 μl of 5% acetic acid. This elution was repeated 10 times. After each fraction was evaporated completely, the samples were dissolved in 50 μl of distilled water. Each solution was tested for antibacterial activity against M. luteus. Overnight cultures of M. luteus (100 μl) were inoculated on TSA plates. Then, 5 μl of each solution was spotted on TSA. After overnight incubation at 37°C, growth inhibition was observed. Samples with antibacterial activity were subjected to HPLC chromatography using an Octadecyl C18 column. After equilibrating the column with 0.1% TFA water, the sample was injected. Thereafter, a linear gradient of 0 to 60% acetonitrile for 30 min was applied to the column. Each peak was fractionated, and the samples were evaporated, then dissolved with 50 μl of distilled water. Subsequently, the antibacterial activity of each fraction was tested with the method above. ESI-MS analysis was performed by LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

Isolation of the strain curing bacteriocin-encoded plasmid

Plasmid deletion in KSE56 and KSE650 was performed with the method described elsewhere [36]. Overnight cultures of KSE56 or KSE650 were inoculated into 5 ml of fresh TSB and incubated at 37°C with shaking. When the OD660 reached 0.5, acriflavine was added at a concentration of 25 μg/ml. After incubation for 12 h, the culture was diluted and plated on TSA. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, colonies were picked, replated on TSA and then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Next, 0.75% soft agar (3.5 ml) containing Bacillus coagulans (200 μl of overnight culture) was poured on that plate and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The strains with no inhibitory zone were picked. Finally, PCR was performed using specific primers for S. epidermidis-specific genes and bacteriocin genes coding for nukacin KSE650 or epidermin.

Susceptibility tests

Two methods were used for the evaluation of bacteriocins. A direct assay was performed with a previously described method [34]. An overnight culture of the bacteriocin-producing strain was spotted on a TSA plate and cultured at 37°C for 24 h. Then, 3.5 ml of prewarmed half-strength TSB soft agar (1%) containing indicator bacterial cells (107 cells/ml) was poured over the TSA plate. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 16 h. The diameters of the growth inhibition zones surrounding the bacteriocin-producing strains were measured in three directions. Three independent experiments were performed, and the average diameter was calculated. Another method was to evaluate the minimal antibacterial dose of purified bacteriocins. Purified epidermin and nukacin KSE650 were adjusted to 0.5 mg/ml. The bacteriocin solution underwent 2-fold serial dilutions (2-fold to 128-fold dilution). Then, 3.5 ml of prewarmed half-strength TSB soft agar (1%) containing bacterial cells (107 cells/ml) was poured over the TSA plate. Thereafter, 2 μl of the bacteriocin solutions with serial dilution (1 μg to 0.03 μg) were spotted on the plate. After the incubation at 37°C for 16 h, the minimum antibacterial dose for the growth inhibition zones was determined.

Co-culture of S. epidermidis with M. luteus

For analysis of the proportion of each bacterium (S. epidermidis and M. luteus) in co-culture by qPCR, we first set up the method for the calculation of bacterial cell number by qPCR. A single overnight culture of the bacterium was first adjusted to OD660 = 1.0, and then a 10-fold serial dilution was performed in 500 μl of lysis buffer. After heating at 95°C for 15 min, samples were centrifuged at 15,000 x rpm for 10 min. Using the supernatant, qPCR was performed with the respective specific primers. For S. epidermidis, the forward and reverse primers used were GGCAAATTTGTGGGTCAAGA and TGGCTAATGGTTTGTCACCA, respectively. For M. luteus, the forward and reverse primers were GGGTTGCGATACTGTGAGGT and TTCGGGTGTTACCGACTTTC, respectively. Finally, the linear relationship between bacterial cell number and cut off value (Ct value) was constructed in each bacterium. Overnight cultures of S. epidermidis KSE1 (no bacteriocin production), KSE56, KSE650 and M. luteus were adjusted to OD660 = 1.0, and the bacterial culture was diluted to 10-fold. Next, 100 μl of S. epidermidis culture and M. luteus were mixed thoroughly. A small portion (20 μl) of mixed culture was spotted on TSA. After overnight incubation at 37°C, the bacterial colonies growing on agar plates were scraped and suspended in 500 μl of lysis buffer. After heating at 95°C for 15 min, the bacterial suspension was centrifuged at 15,000 x rpm for 10 min and the culture supernatant was stocked as the template for quantitative PCR (qPCR). qPCR was performed using appropriate specific primers to determine the cell number of each bacterium in the co-culture samples. Finally, the proportion of 2 bacterial species was determined. Three independent experiments were performed. Post hoc multiple comparisons were made using Tukey’s test.

Results

Isolation of S. epidermidis that produced bacteriocin

From 287 volunteers, 150 S. epidermidis strains (52.3%) were isolated from the oral cavity. Among 150 S. epidermidis strains, 2 strains showing a clear inhibitory zone against the S. aureus MW2 braRS inactivated mutant were identified by the direct method (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Direct assay of bacteriocin-producing S. epidermidis against braRS-inactivated S. aureus.

The antibacterial activity of bacteriocin-producing S. epidermidis was evaluated by the direct assay using S. aureus MW2 braRS-inactivated mutant.

Direct assay of bacteriocin-producing S. epidermidis against braRS-inactivated S. aureus.

The antibacterial activity of bacteriocin-producing S. epidermidis was evaluated by the direct assay using S. aureus MW2 braRS-inactivated mutant.

Nucleotide sequence of epidermin-encoding plasmid

The size of the entire plasmid, pEpi56, is 64,386 bp, with 81 ORFs (Fig 2A and Table 2). The plasmid contains epidermin synthesis genes (epiA coding for epidermin KSE56, modification genes epiBCD, processing genes epiP, export genes epiHT, immunity genes epiGEF, and regulatory gene epiQ), replication-related genes, and other genes including the genes coding for hypothetical proteins (Table 2). Compared with epidermin-related genes in the Tü3298 strain [19] epiT, which codes for an exporter, was intactin pEpi56, while a gene disrupted into two fragments (epiT’ and epiT” or epiY and epiY’) was found in the Tü3298 strain (Figs 2B and S1). The nucleotide sequence of epiA in KSE56 showed 2 mismatches with that of the Tü3298 strain (S2 Fig). However, the amino acid sequence of epidermin KSE56 showed 100% identity with that in the Tü3298 strain.
Fig 2

Gene map of the epidermin-carrying plasmid in KSE56.

(a) Epidermin-encoding plasmid from KSE56 (pEpi56). ORFs are shown as arrows, indicating the orientation of transcription. The arrow numbers indicate the ORF number displayed in Table 2. Colors indicate the classification of gene function. (b) Bacteriocin-coding region (KSE56 epidermin). The bacteriocin-coding region from pEpi56 was compared with pTu32 epiP-Y’ (accession number X62386) and pTu32 epiT"-G (accession number U77778). Striped blue arrows indicate truncated epiT.

Table 2

Genes in pEpi56.

No.Location (bp)Size (aa)aTranslation signalbHomologue as determined by BLAST and/or FASTA
SourceDescription(s)Identity (%)Overlap (aa)cAccession no.Note
1190–1191333 GAGGTTTTTTATTATG S. epidermidisreplication initiator protein A99333/338WP_002498716.1
21423–1983186 AAGGAGTAATAAAAATG S. epidermidisTIGR00730 family Rossman fold protein99186/186WP_158171994.1
32300–251571-S. epidermidishypothetical protein6748/78MBM0824966.1
42889–301441 GGAGAATAATTAATAAACCCGTTACAAAATAAGCAATATCTATAAGTTTTTTAAAAATTAAAAATTCTAAAATATGTAAGTATG S. epidermidis SK135ATP-binding cassette domain-containing protein10041/41EFA87131.1
53507–369562 GAGTTAGACCAATAAATTGAAACGAAAAAACAATTGTTG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10062/62MBC8789835.1
64346–451355 GGAGGCATTTGTCATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10055/55WP_002498713.1
74819–5685288 GGAGTGATATATATG S. epidermidisRepB family plasmid replication initiator protein99287/288WP_203085279.1
85791–593447 GGAGACATAAAAAGTTATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10047/47WP_002498711.1
96397–7026209 GAGTAATCATG S. epidermidisABC transporter, ATP-binding protein100209/209EJD97739.1
107029–9071680 AGGTATTTATACATATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040bacteriocin-associated integral membrane protein100680/680EJD97738.1
119165–9557130 GGAGGATTAAGTTGATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040bacteriocin, lactococcin 972 family100130/130EJD97736.1
129743–10105120 GAGAATTATACAAAAATG S. epidermidisDUF3139 domain-containing protein100120/120WP_002498706.1
1310304–10669121 GAGGGACATACATTAGATATTTGGTTG S. epidermidis NIHLM040IS431mec, transposase100121/121EJD97734.1
1410732–1088450 GGAGTCTTCTGTATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein10050/50EJD97733.1
1511171–12556461 GAGGTGCTATATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040putative epidermin leader peptide-processing serine protease EpiP100461/461EJD97732.1 epiP
1612567–13184205 GGAATAAAATG S. epidermidiswinged helix family transcriptional regulator100205/205MBM0752529.1 epiQ
1713181–13726181 GGAGGAATAAGATATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040epidermin decarboxylase100181/181EJD97730.1 epiD
1813742–14992416 GGATGGTTGTG S. epidermidis NIHLM040putative epidermin biosynthesis protein EpiC100416/416EJD97729.1 epiC
1914985–17945986 GAGGTGAAATAGAATTG S. epidermidis NIHLM040thiopeptide-type bacteriocin biosynthesis domain protein100986/986EJD97728.1 epiB
2018011–1816952 AGGAGTGTTTAAAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040lantibiotic epidermin10052/52EJD97726.1 epiA
2118419–19969516 GGACTAATATTGAGTTTG S. epidermidisABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease100516/516WP_002498696.1 epiT’
2219985–20977330 GAGATAAGGGAGATATATG S. epidermidisYdcF family protein100330/330WP_032605946.1 epiH
2321136–21831231 GGAGGAATAATTCTTG S. epidermidislantibiotic protection ABC transporter ATP-binding protein100231/231WP_002498693.1 epiF
2421833–22597254 GGAAATAATATG S. epidermidislantibiotic immunity ABC transporter MutE/EpiE family permease subunit100254/254WP_002498692.1 epiE
2522587–23279230 GGAATATAAATG S. epidermidisepidermin immunity protein F100230/230WP_002498691.1 epiG
2623432–24034200 GAGGTGGAAATCAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040putative transposon DNA-invertase Bin3100200/200EJD97719.1
2724455–26071538 GGAGGAAGAAAAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein100538/538EJD97718.1
2826621–27463280 GGAGCATTAATTATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein100280/280WP_002498688.1
2927952–28383143 AAGGAGTCTTCTGTATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040IS431mec, transposase family protein100143/143EJD97715.1
3028376–2862783 AGGCACCTTCAACGAAGGTAGCAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040IS431mec, transposase family protein10083/83EJD97714.1
3128733–29455240 GGAGTGTAAGCTTTG S. epidermidispeptide ABC transporter permease100240/240WP_002498749.1
3229472–30107211 GGAGCTGTAAACATTG S. epidermidis NIHLM040ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein100211/211EJD97793.1
3330389–3048431 GGAGAGATTAAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein10031/31EJD97792.1
3430495–3066556 AGGTTAATTTTATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10056/56TID00490.1
3530897–31535212 AGGTTCAAGATGAAAACAAAGAAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein100212/212EJD97791.1
3631698–32063121 GAGGAGAGAACTTTTAAAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein100121/121EJD97790.1
3732230–3240658 GGAGTGATTTAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein10058/58EJD97789.1
3832573–34183536 GGAAGGATTATTATG S. epidermidisDNA mismatch repair protein MutS100536/536WP_002498743.1
3934762–3505898 GGATTGAATG S. epidermidisreplication initiation protein10098/98MBF2337202.1
4035232–3551092 GGAGAGATTAAATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10092/92WP_002498740.1
4135521–3569156 GGATTTTATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10056/56WP_099800689.1
4236232–3636945 GGAG ACATAAGAAGGTATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10045/45MBM6015004.1
4336517–3673271 GGAAATGACACATCTTAAATCGACATATTCCAAAAATATGTTTAGAATACTGGTTACATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10071/71WP_002498738.1
4437358–37726122 GAGACGTCTATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein100122/122EJD97781.1
4537880–38335151-S. epidermidisputative plasmid recombination enzyme100151/151TID00443.1
4638651–3890584 GGAGTTCCTTTAAATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10084/84EJD97779.1
4738927–3906746 GGAAGATGAAATAGTCCTAATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10046/46WP_151520775.1
4839102–40481459 GGAGGTATGATAGATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040drug resistance MFS transporter, drug:H+ antiporter-2 family100459/459EJD97777.1
4940630–41637335 GGAGCGATGGAAATG S. epidermidistryptophan—tRNA ligase100335/335WP_002498732.1
5041862–42590242 AAGGAGAATAAACAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040ABC transporter permease100242/242EJD97775.1
5142594–43457287 AAGGAGAATAAAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein100287/287EJD97774.1
5243704–44525273 GGAGGATTTTATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040transcriptional regulator, LysR family100273/273EJD97773.1
5344678–45817379 GAGGATGGGATAATAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040MFS transporter100379/379EJD97772.1
5446236–46613125 GGAAAAGAGTAAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein96125/125EJE04311.1
5546649–47338229 GGAGACGATAATGTG S. epidermidis NIHLM040ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein100229/229EJD97770.1
5647346–48107253 GGAGGAATGAAGCAATTATG S. epidermidisABC transporter permease99253/253WP_002503830.1
5748465–48857130-S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein100130/130EJD97768.1
5848948–49919323 GGAGAAATTATG S. epidermidisDUF418 domain-containing protein99323/323WP_095694513.1
5949974–5010844 GGAAGGATTG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10044/44EFA87101.1
6050567–5072251-S. epidermidishypothetical protein10051/51MBC2926404.1
6151633–52454273 AGGTGTGATTTAAATG S. epidermidisrelaxase MobL99273/273WP_161382396.1
6252466–52849127 GGAGGAATAAAATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein100127/127EJD97765.1
6352851–5312992 GGAATGATTTTTTTG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein10092/92EJD97764.1
6454078–5422448S. epidermidishypothetical protein10048/48WP_002456268.1
6554621–5480059 GGAGGCTTATACATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040CsbD family protein10059/59EJD97762.1
6654833–55231132 GAGGTGTTTGTATATG S. epidermidisYolD-like family protein100132/132WP_002498728.1
6755394–5565185-S. epidermidis NIHLM040prevent-host-death family protein10085/85EJD97760.1
6855651–5591788-S. epidermidis NIHLM040addiction module toxin, Txe/YoeB family10088/88EJD97759.1
6955934–5610456 GGAGGACTCGTTAATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10056/56KAB2267008.1
7056465–5668974S. epidermidisputative glycoside hydrolase10074/74QRX38739.1
7157190–57546118 GGAGGTTGTATGTATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein100118/118EJD97756.1
7257860–58408182-S. epidermidis NIHLM040putative resolvase100182/182EJD97755.1
7359658–60926422 GGAGAATTTAATAATG S. epidermidispenicillin-binding protein PBP499422/422WP_002498725.1
7461202–61603133-S. epidermidistransposase DNA-binding domain protein100133/133TID00494.1
7561744–6192660 GAGTCGTTTAGATG S. epidermidistransposase9860/60WP_203079065.1
7661958–6218876 GAGGTGTATTGACATG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein9976/76EJD97751.1
7762255–6240750 GGAGGAATTAAATTG S. epidermidis NIHLM040hypothetical protein10050/50EJD97750.1
7862434–6259553 GGAGGCGGGAAATTG S. epidermidisBH0509 family protein10053/53EJD97749.1
7962670–6290979 GGAGGAAGATAATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10079/79WP_002498719.1
8063024–6327282 GGAGGTATCAAGGTTATG S. epidermidisCopG family transcriptional regulator10082/82MBM0752797.1
8163390–64280296-S. epidermidisParA family protein100268/296WP_002498717.1

a aa, amino acids.

b Bold letters indicate start codons. Underlines indicate putative ribosome binding sites complementary to the 3’ end of the 16s rRNA.

c Overlap is indicated as the number of overlapping amino acids/total number of amino acids.

Gene map of the epidermin-carrying plasmid in KSE56.

(a) Epidermin-encoding plasmid from KSE56 (pEpi56). ORFs are shown as arrows, indicating the orientation of transcription. The arrow numbers indicate the ORF number displayed in Table 2. Colors indicate the classification of gene function. (b) Bacteriocin-coding region (KSE56 epidermin). The bacteriocin-coding region from pEpi56 was compared with pTu32 epiP-Y’ (accession number X62386) and pTu32 epiT"-G (accession number U77778). Striped blue arrows indicate truncated epiT. a aa, amino acids. b Bold letters indicate start codons. Underlines indicate putative ribosome binding sites complementary to the 3’ end of the 16s rRNA. c Overlap is indicated as the number of overlapping amino acids/total number of amino acids.

Nucleotide sequence of nukacin-encoding plasmid

The size of the entire plasmid, pNuk650, was 26,160 bp, with 29 open reading frames (ORFs). The plasmid contained nukacin KSE650 synthesis genes (nukA coding for prepeptide nukacin KSE650, posttranslational modification enzyme genes nukM, processing and secretion transporter genes nukT, and immunity protein genes nukFEGH), replication-related genes, and other genes including genes coding for hypothetical proteins (Fig 3A and Table 3). Compared to the plasmid pIVK45 (21,840 bp), which carried the gene coding for nukacin IVK45 [28] pNuk650 was larger with a higher number of ORFs (Fig 3A). The amino acid sequence of nukacin KSE650 showed similarity to nukacin IVK45 with one mismatch at the 4th position, but displayed lower similarity to nukacin ISK-1 with 10 mismatches [36, 37] (Fig 3B). The mature peptide of nukacin KSE650 showed a perfect match with nukacin IVK45 and 5 mismatches with nukacin ISK-1.
Fig 3

Nukacin-carrying plasmids and amino acid sequences of nukacin.

(a) Nukacin-encoding plasmid from KSE650 (pNuk650) and the comparison with pIVK45. (b) Amino acid alignment of nukacin ISK-1, nukacin 3299, nukacin KQU131, nukacin IVK45 and nukacin KSE650.

Table 3

Genes in pNuk650.

No.Location (bp)Size (aa)aTranslation signalbHomologue as determined by BLAST and/or FASTA
SourceDescription(s)Identity (%)Overlap (aa)cAccession no.
1413–54142 GGAAAAGATATCCATG S. epidermidisRepB (pAQZ2)8342/42AZL87916
2680–85056-S. epidermidisreplication protein9156/56WP_194376762
3976–1911311 GGAAGAGGTTTATATTATG S. epidermidisreplication initiator protein A100311/311WP_194378689
42467–3261264 AGGAGGTATTATTTTG S. epidermidisParA family protein100264/264WP_172686110
53258–346769 GAGGGTGTGTG S. epidermidisplasmid replication associated protein, putative transcriptional regulator9866/69AKQ51589
63821–399457 AGGGGGTATTATAATG S. epidermidis (pIVK45)NukA9857/57AKQ51579
74068–425060 AGGTACGCGTTTTTAAATTGTATATATG S. epidermidistransposase family protein9238/60MBV5159007
84256–439345 GAGACCATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein10045/45WP_194378692
94605–484479-S. epidermidistransposase10074/79WP_172686114
105583–6326247 GAGTGAATTATATG S. epidermidisLytTR family transcriptional regulator DNA-binding domain-containing protein100247/247WP_194378694
116570–9323917 AGGAGAGGTTGTTATATATG S. epidermidis (pIVK45)NukM100917/917AKQ51580
129345–11429694 AGGTGAATACAATTG S. epidermidis (pIVK45)NukT99694/694KP702950
1311442–12350302 AGGAGGTTCAATTTATG NukF99302/302AKQ51583
1412351–13103250 GGAAAGGAATATTTATAAATG S. epidermidis (pIVK45)NukE99250/250AKQ51582
1513100–13837245 AAGGAGAGATTTATCTTG S. epidermidis (pIVK45)NukG88245/245AKQ51591
1613844–1412292 GAGGATTAATAACTAATG S. epidermidis (pIVK45)NukH10092/92AKQ51584
1714444–1462359-S. epidermidisreplication initiator protein A, partial8859/272WP_064595943
1814790–1493046 GGATAACAAAATAACATCAACACAATGTCACGATTTCATAATATAGCATG S. epidermidishypothetical protein9846/46WP_172686106
1915014–1515747 GGAATGATAAATTCAACTTTTTCTTTCCGATCATTAATAAAATAAATG no significant similarity found
2015425–16423332 TAAGGTGTCGAATCTAAATAAAACTGGGGGCTTTTTTATG S. epidermidisprotein rep98332/332WP_145461985
2117100–17483127 AGGGGTTTTTTTATG S. epidermidis IS-Kbacterial transcription activator, effector-binding domain protein99127/127EID36019
2217957–18664235 GAGAGGTGTTTTTTTATGTCTGGTGAAACAGTAGTATATAGAAATG S. epidermidisRepB family plasmid replication initiator protein100235/235WP_194378685
2318712–19323203 AGGAGTAGTTTATG S. epidermidishelix-turn-helix domain-containing protein99203/203WP_194378686
2419890–20699269 GGAGAGAAATATATATTG S. epidermidisCPBP family intramembrane metalloprotease100269/269WP_168429436
2520725–21039104 GAGGTGTAAAAAATG S. epidermidishelix-turn-helix domain-containing protein99104/104WP_002455864
2621312–22928538 AGGATTATTATG S. epidermidisMutS family DNA mismatch repair protein99538/538WP_194378687
2723374–25119581 AGGTGAAGTTAAAAGTG S. epidermidisAIPR family protein100581/581WP_194378688
2825145–25853202 GGAATCAATG S. epidermidis (pIVK45)Sin recombinase100202/202AKQ51586
2925976–2607733 AAGGAGGAATACTATG S. epidermidisNAD-dependent epimerase/dehydratase family protein10033/33WP_172686124

a aa, amino acids.

b Bold letters indicate start codons. Underlines indicate putative ribosome binding sites complementary to the 3’ end of the 16s rRNA.

c Overlap is indicated as the number of overlapping amino acids/total number of amino acid.

Nukacin-carrying plasmids and amino acid sequences of nukacin.

(a) Nukacin-encoding plasmid from KSE650 (pNuk650) and the comparison with pIVK45. (b) Amino acid alignment of nukacin ISK-1, nukacin 3299, nukacin KQU131, nukacin IVK45 and nukacin KSE650. a aa, amino acids. b Bold letters indicate start codons. Underlines indicate putative ribosome binding sites complementary to the 3’ end of the 16s rRNA. c Overlap is indicated as the number of overlapping amino acids/total number of amino acid.

Identification of epidermin KSE56 and nukacin KSE650

Epidermin KSE56 and nukacin KSE650 were purified from the culture supernatant of KSE56 and KSE650, respectively. After applying the sample purified by Macro Prep resin to Octadecyl C18 column, peak fractions in both samples were collected and each peak fraction was checked for the antibacterial activity against M. luteus. In both samples, one peak fraction showed a strong antibacterial activity (Fig 4A). Using ESI-MS analysis, the molecular masses of purified epidermin KSE56 and nukacin KSE650 were found to be 2163.97 Da and 2938.36 Da, respectively (Fig 4B). The mass of these peptides corresponded to calculated mass of epidermin (2163.95 Da) and nukacin KSE650 (2938.33 Da).
Fig 4

Purification of epidermin and nukacin KSE650 by reverse phase-HPLC and mass determination by ESI-MS.

(a) RP-HPLC chromatogram of epidermin and nukacin KSE650. The arrow shows the peak corresponding to epidermin (upper) or nukacin KSE650 (lower). (b) Mass determination of epidermin (upper) or nukacin KSE650 (lower) by ESI-MS. Several isotopic peaks in each mass/charge (m/z) state.

Purification of epidermin and nukacin KSE650 by reverse phase-HPLC and mass determination by ESI-MS.

(a) RP-HPLC chromatogram of epidermin and nukacin KSE650. The arrow shows the peak corresponding to epidermin (upper) or nukacin KSE650 (lower). (b) Mass determination of epidermin (upper) or nukacin KSE650 (lower) by ESI-MS. Several isotopic peaks in each mass/charge (m/z) state.

Antibacterial activity of epidermin KSE56 and nukacin KSE650 against several skin and oral commensal bacteria

In this study, S. epidermidis strains were isolated from the oral cavity. S. epidermidis is also known as a commensal bacterium. Therefore, we investigated the antibacterial activity of the two bacteriocins against oral and skin commensal bacterial species. We first performed a direct assay using KSE56, KSE650 and plasmid-deleted strains. The plasmid-deleted strains showed no inhibitory zone against S. hominis, while the wild-type strains, KSE56 and KSE650, displayed inhibitory zones (Fig 5).
Fig 5

Antibacterial activity of KSE56, KSE650, and their plasmid-deleted strains.

Direct assays were performed using KSE56, KSE650, and their plasmid-deleted strains. S. hominis was used as an indicator strain.

Antibacterial activity of KSE56, KSE650, and their plasmid-deleted strains.

Direct assays were performed using KSE56, KSE650, and their plasmid-deleted strains. S. hominis was used as an indicator strain. Afterwards, we performed a direct assay using KSE56 and KSE650 as bacteriocin-producing strains (Table 4). The epidermin-producing strain, KSE56, showed a strong antibacterial activity (>20 mm diameter inhibitory zone) against M. luteus, and an activity (>5 mm diameter) against R. mucilaginosa, C. pseudodiphtheriticum, S. haemolyticus, S. captis, S. hominis, S. simulans, and S. saprophyticus. KSE56 also showed an antibacterial activity against S. epidermidis without bacteriocin production (KSE1, 10, 12, 16), plasmid-curing KSE56 and plasmid-curing KSE650. The inhibitory zone was not observed in S. epidermidis KSE56, S. epidermidis KSE650, C. accolens, S. warneri ISK-1, and S. aureus strains. Regarding oral streptococci, KSE56 showed a strong activity against S. salivarius and S. gordonii, and modest activity against S. mutans and S. sanguinis.
Table 4

Antibacterial activity of KSE56 and KSE650 against various bacterial species.

Indicator strainsHalo size (mm)
KSE56KSE650S. warneri
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum JCM132010.0±0.810.7±0.511.7±0.5
Corynebacterium accolens JCM8331--11.3±0.5
Micrococcus luteus JCM146431.7±1.227.0±033.0±0
Rothia mucilaginosa JCM109108.7±0.58.0±013.0±0
Cutibacterium acnes JCM642515.0±0.8--
Staphylococcus haemolyticus JCM241611.7±0.613.3±0.516.0±0.8
Staphylococcus capitis JCM242011.3±0.627.3±0.517.3±0.5
Staphylococcus simulans JCM242413.7±0.628.7±0.522.7±0.5
Staphylococcus saprophyticus JCM2059513.0±012.3±0.513.3±0.5
Staphylococcus hominis JCM3191215.3±0.616.3±0.521.7±0.5
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE112.3±0.57.0±0.8N.D.2
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE1012.0±07.3±0.5N.D.
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE1217.0±0.89.7±0.5N.D.
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE1614.3±0.58.7±0.5N.D.
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE56---
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE650---
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE56 plasmid-deleted20.3±0.511.3±0.5N.D.
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE650 plasmid-deleted11.0±011.7±0.5N.D.
Staphylococcus warneri ISK-1---
Staphylococcus aureus MW2--11.3±0.5
Staphylococcus aureus COL--11.0±0
Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 (MSSA)--10.7±0.5
Streptococcus mutans UA15915.0±0.8--
Streptococcus sanguinis GTC21712.0±0-10.3±0.9
Streptococcus salivarius GTC21527.7±0.512.3±0.518.3±0.5
Streptococcus gordonii JCM1299529.0±017.0±023.0±0

"-" and "N.D." represent "no inhibitory zone" and "Not determined", respectively.

"-" and "N.D." represent "no inhibitory zone" and "Not determined", respectively. The nukacin KSE650-producing strain KSE650, showed strong antibacterial activity (>20 mm diameter) against M. luteus, S. captis, and S. simulans, and an activity (>5 mm diameter) against C. pseudodiphtheriticum, R. mucilaginosa, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, and S. saprophyticus. KSE650 also showed an antibacterial activity against S. epidermidis without bacteriocin production (KSE1, 10, 12, 16), plasmid-curing KSE56 and plasmid-curing KSE650. The inhibitory zone was not observed in S. epidermidis KSE56, S. epidermidis KSE650, C. accolens, S. warneri ISK-1, and S. aureus strains. Regarding oral streptococci, KSE650 showed activity against S. salivarius and S. gordonii, and no activity against S. mutans and S. sanguinis. Compared to the nukacin ISK-1-producing S. warneri strain, S. warneri showed stronger activity against commensal and oral bacteria except for S. capitis and S. simulans. Notably, S. warneri ISK-1 showed activity against the S. aureus strain. We also checked the antibacterial activity using purified epidermin and nukacin KSE650 (Table 5). The antibacterial pattern against each bacterium was similar to the results of the direct assay.
Table 5

Minimum antibacterial dose of purified epidermin and nukacin KSE650.

Indicator strainsMinimum antibacterial dose (μg)
EpiderminNukacin KSE650
Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum JCM132022
Corynebacterium accolens JCM8331> 2> 2
Micrococcus luteus JCM1464< 0.03< 0.03
Rothia mucilaginosa JCM109100.51
Staphylococcus haemolyticus JCM24160.1250.25
Staphylococcus capitis JCM24200.125< 0.03
Staphylococcus simulans JCM24240.125< 0.03
Staphylococcus saprophyticus JCM205950.50.25
Staphylococcus hominis JCM319120.060.25
Staphylococcus epidermidis KSE10.51
Staphylococcus aureus MW222
Streptococcus mutans UA1591> 2
Streptococcus sanguinis GTC2170.51
Streptococcus salivarius GTC2150.060.25
Streptococcus gordonii JCM129950.060.125
Co-cultures of S. epidermidis KSE1 (bacteriocin negative), KSE56, and KSE650 with M. luteus JCM1464 were analyzed. M. luteus was utilized as an indicator bacterium in co-culture assay because in the direct method, KSE56 and KSE650 showed a significant antibacterial effect against M. luteus. In co-culture with M. luteus, the proportion of S. epidermids KSE1 was 46.2%, while the proportions of KSE56 and KSE650 were 70.4% and 79.8%, respectively (Fig 6).
Fig 6

The proportion of S. epidermidis KSE1, KSE56, and KSE650 in co-culture with M. luteus.

Co-culture assays were performed according to the method described in the Materials and methods. Post hoc multiple comparisons were made using Tukey’s test.

The proportion of S. epidermidis KSE1, KSE56, and KSE650 in co-culture with M. luteus.

Co-culture assays were performed according to the method described in the Materials and methods. Post hoc multiple comparisons were made using Tukey’s test.

Discussion

In this study, we tried to isolate S. epidermidis strains that produced bacteriocin. We used the S. aureus MW2 braRS-inactivated mutant as the indicator strain for screening. We previously reported that BraRS was involved in resistance to several bacteriocins including nisin A, nukacin ISK-1 and bacitracin [34]; therefore, a braRS-inactivated mutant increased susceptibility to these bacteriocins. Nisin A and nukacin ISK-1 are lantibiotics that act against lipid II molecules, which are responsible for cell wall biosynthesis, and subsequently, form a pour complex [38]. In addition, it was reported that many gram-positive bacteria, including staphylococci, streptococci, bacilli, lactococci and enterococci, produced lantibiotics that bind to lipid II [12, 19–27, 39, 40] Therefore, the braRS-inactivated mutant is a good indicator strain to screen lipid II-binding lantibiotics. Finally, we identified 2 strains that produce epidermin and nukacin IVK45-like bacteriocins. Whole genome analysis of the 2 strains revealed that both genes were located on the plasmids (S2A and 4 Figs). Epidermin was first identified in the S. epidermidis Tü3298 strain [19, 41]. In the Tü3298 strain, epidermin is located on the plasmid, pTu32. Recently, the whole genome sequence of the Tü3298 strain was determined [42], but the entire plasmid sequence of pEpi56 was not reported. Therefore, our study is the first to report the complete nucleotide sequence of epidermin harboring plasmids. Additionally, the epidermin-producing strain identified in this study was the second strain, following the Tü3298 strain. The nucleotide sequence of the epiA coding epidermin showed 2 mismatches between the two strains, but the amino acid sequence was similar. When the epidermin synthesis genes were compared between the 2 strains, epiT showed a significant difference (Fig 2B). epiT in KSE56 was intact, while this gene in Tu3298 was disrupted into 2 genes, epiT’ and epiT” in Tü3298. EpiT is involved in the secretion of the peptide. In previous reports that demonstrated the antibacterial activity of epidermin in Tü3298 [19-21], epidermin was correctly modified and secreted externally. However, Peschel A et al reported that the introduction of intact gdmT, encoding the secretion protein for gallidermin, which was close to epidermin in Tü3298, increased the production of epidermin in culture supernatant [43]. Therefore, the secretion activity of epiT’/T” is considered to be partial, while the intact epiT gene in KSE56 may be responsible for full secretion of the epidermin peptide. Nukacin IVK-1 was first identified in S. warneri [37]. Since then, nukacin ISK-1 like bacteriocins have been identified in S. epidermidis [28], S. hominis [44], and S. simulans [45]. The amino acid sequence of KSE650 shows a high similarity with that of IVK45 by only one mismatch in the entire peptide, and 100% match with the mature peptide. Comparison of the plasmid between the two strains showed that KSE650 was larger than Tü3298, but the composition and the order of nukacin-related genes were identical (Fig 2A). The larger size of pNuk650 was due to the insertion of an approximately 8 kbp fragment, which was detected in pNuk650 but not in pIVK45 (Fig 3A, red arrows). The antibacterial activity of these peptides against skin and oral commensal bacteria (oral streptococci) showed different patterns. In particular, the epidermin-producing strain (KSE56) had antibacterial activity against oral streptococci, while nukacin-producing strains had less activity. Interestingly, comparing nukacin ISK-1 and nukacin KSE650 suggested that 5 amino acid differences (Fig 7) were responsible for the different activities against several bacteria used in this study. Previously, it was reported that the structure of ring A in nukacin ISK-1 binds to the pyrophosphate moiety of lipid II, the precursor for cell wall peptidoglycan biosynthesis, and ring C was also associated with the binding of the isoprene chain [46]. Since lipid II molecules are widely conserved among gram positive bacteria, the different antibacterial activities between nukacin ISK-1 and nukacin KSE650 are influenced by the other molecules specific to each bacterial species. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that epidermin and nukacin KSE650 showed no inhibitory zone against S. epidermidis KSE650 and KSE56, respectively, while epidermin and nukacin KSE650 showed an activity against plasmid-curing KSE650 and plasmid-curing KSE56, respectively (Table 4). Although the immunity factors for epidermin and nukacin KSE650 were EpiFEG and NukFEG/NukH, respectively, which could be found in a respective plasmid, our results indicate that these immunity factors showed a cross-resistance to another bacteriocin. We previously reported that BraRS and ApsRS, TCSs, are involved in resistance to nisin A and nukacin ISK-1 [34]. Since S. epidermidis also possesses TCSs with similarity to BraRS and ApsRS, S. epidermidis TCSs may be involved in the resistance to epidermin and nukacin KSE650.
Fig 7

Structure of nukacin ISK-1 and nukacin KSE650.

The mature peptide sequences of nukacin ISK-1 and nukacin KSE650 are shown. The deduced calculated mass of mature nukacin KSE650 is consistent with that observed by ESI-MS. The structure is identical to that of nukacin ISK-1, except for the residues indicated by gray circles. Dhb, Ala-S-Ala, and Abu-S-Ala indicate dehydrobutyrine, lanthionine, and 3-methyllanthionine respectively.

Structure of nukacin ISK-1 and nukacin KSE650.

The mature peptide sequences of nukacin ISK-1 and nukacin KSE650 are shown. The deduced calculated mass of mature nukacin KSE650 is consistent with that observed by ESI-MS. The structure is identical to that of nukacin ISK-1, except for the residues indicated by gray circles. Dhb, Ala-S-Ala, and Abu-S-Ala indicate dehydrobutyrine, lanthionine, and 3-methyllanthionine respectively. In conclusion, we determined the complete sequence of two plasmids encoding epidermin and nukacin KSE650 in S. epidermidis isolated from the oral cavity. S. epidermidis is the major commensal bacterium in human skin and the oral cavity. Based on our findings of the direct assay and co-culture assay, it is speculated that bacteriocins produced by S. epidermidis affect the bacterial composition of the host flora, including the skin, nasal and oral flora. However, in this study, we focused on the isolation of lantibiotic-producing strains using a braRS-inactivated strain as the indicator. Therefore, it is possible that S. epidermidis also produces other types of bacteriocins. Further studies are required to demonstrate the influence of S. epidermidis bacteriocins on the formation of bacterial flora.

Comparison of amino acid sequences of EpiT between the KSE56 and Tü3298 strains.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file. Comparison of nucleotide (A) and amino acid sequences (B) of epiA between the KSE56 and Tü3298 strains. (PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  46 in total

1.  Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus — Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997-1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Conversion of a homogeneously methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus to heterogeneous resistance by Tn551-mediated insertional inactivation.

Authors:  J Kornblum; B J Hartman; R P Novick; A Tomasz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  The human skin microbiome.

Authors:  Allyson L Byrd; Yasmine Belkaid; Julia A Segre
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Biosynthesis of the lantibiotic Pep5. Isolation and characterization of a prepeptide containing dehydroamino acids.

Authors:  H P Weil; A G Beck-Sickinger; J Metzger; S Stevanovic; G Jung; M Josten; H G Sahl
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1990-11-26

Review 5.  Staphylococcus epidermidis--the 'accidental' pathogen.

Authors:  Michael Otto
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 6.  Coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  Kathie L Rogers; Paul D Fey; Mark E Rupp
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.982

7.  Comparative Microbiological and Whole-Genome Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Populations in the Oro-Nasal Cavities, Skin and Diabetic Foot Ulcers of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Reveals a Possible Oro-Nasal Reservoir for Ulcer Infection.

Authors:  Brenda A McManus; Blánaid Daly; Ioannis Polyzois; Pauline Wilson; Gráinne I Brennan; Tanya E Fleming; Liam D Grealy; Marie-Louise Healy; David C Coleman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  The lantibiotic nukacin ISK-1 exists in an equilibrium between active and inactive lipid-II binding states.

Authors:  Daisuke Fujinami; Abdullah-Al -Mahin; Khaled M Elsayed; Mohammad R Islam; Jun-Ichi Nagao; Urmi Roy; Sabrina Momin; Takeshi Zendo; Daisuke Kohda; Kenji Sonomoto
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-09-25

9.  Comprehensive analysis of bacteriocins in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Atsuko Watanabe; Miki Kawada-Matsuo; Mi Nguyen-Tra Le; Junzo Hisatsune; Yuichi Oogai; Yoshio Nakano; Masanobu Nakata; Shouichi Miyawaki; Motoyuki Sugai; Hitoshi Komatsuzawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Bacteriocin Production by Beta-Hemolytic Streptococci.

Authors:  Verena Vogel; Barbara Spellerberg
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-07-09
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Efficiency of Antimicrobial Peptides Against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcal Pathogens.

Authors:  Mi Nguyen-Tra Le; Miki Kawada-Matsuo; Hitoshi Komatsuzawa
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.