Caitlin L Penny1, Sean M Tanino1, Paul J Mosca2,3,4. 1. Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA. 2. Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA. Paul.mosca@duke.edu. 3. Department of Surgery, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA. Paul.mosca@duke.edu. 4. Duke Network Services, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA. Paul.mosca@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Operative management of patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) may provide effective palliation, but is associated with substantial risks. This study aimed to analyze racial and ethnic differences in surgical outcomes for patients with MBO. METHODS: This retrospective study, using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry data from 2010 to 2019, compared differences in outcomes by race and ethnicity for 2762 patients undergoing surgery for MBO. Multivariable logistic regression controlled for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Black patients (n = 407) had higher rates of preoperative comorbidity and were more likely than White patients (n = 2081) to have major complications (28.5% vs 21.8%; p = 0.0031), overall complications (47.4% vs 40.4%; p = 0.0087), a longer median hospital stay (12 days; interquartile range [IQR, 8-19 days] vs 10 days [IQR, 7-17 days]; p = 0.0007), and unplanned readmission (17.1% vs 12.9%; p = 0.0266). Black patients had a similar mortality rate to that of White patients and were less frequently discharged to home (67.6% vs 73.0%; p = 0.0315). Differences in morbidity between Black patients and White patients persisted after controlling for potentially confounding variables. Hispanic patients had lower mortality than White patients (6.3% vs 13.1%; p = 0.0130) and a longer hospital stay (12 days [IQR, 8-18 days] vs 10 days [IQR, 7-17 days]; p = 0.0313). Outcomes did not differ between Asian patients and White patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated significant disparities for Black patients undergoing surgery for MBO. Understanding and addressing what drives these differences, including systemic inequalities such as access to care and racial biases, is essential to the achievement of more equitable, higher-quality patient care.
BACKGROUND: Operative management of patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) may provide effective palliation, but is associated with substantial risks. This study aimed to analyze racial and ethnic differences in surgical outcomes for patients with MBO. METHODS: This retrospective study, using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry data from 2010 to 2019, compared differences in outcomes by race and ethnicity for 2762 patients undergoing surgery for MBO. Multivariable logistic regression controlled for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Black patients (n = 407) had higher rates of preoperative comorbidity and were more likely than White patients (n = 2081) to have major complications (28.5% vs 21.8%; p = 0.0031), overall complications (47.4% vs 40.4%; p = 0.0087), a longer median hospital stay (12 days; interquartile range [IQR, 8-19 days] vs 10 days [IQR, 7-17 days]; p = 0.0007), and unplanned readmission (17.1% vs 12.9%; p = 0.0266). Black patients had a similar mortality rate to that of White patients and were less frequently discharged to home (67.6% vs 73.0%; p = 0.0315). Differences in morbidity between Black patients and White patients persisted after controlling for potentially confounding variables. Hispanic patients had lower mortality than White patients (6.3% vs 13.1%; p = 0.0130) and a longer hospital stay (12 days [IQR, 8-18 days] vs 10 days [IQR, 7-17 days]; p = 0.0313). Outcomes did not differ between Asian patients and White patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated significant disparities for Black patients undergoing surgery for MBO. Understanding and addressing what drives these differences, including systemic inequalities such as access to care and racial biases, is essential to the achievement of more equitable, higher-quality patient care.
Authors: Elie K Mehanna; Paul J Catalano; Daniel N Cagney; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Brian M Alexander; James A Tulsky; Ayal A Aizer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sarah B Bateni; Richard J Bold; Frederick J Meyers; Daniel J Canter; Robert J Canter Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Luke T Ingersoll; Stewart C Alexander; Jeff Priest; Susan Ladwig; Wendy Anderson; Kevin Fiscella; Ronald M Epstein; Sally A Norton; Robert Gramling Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2019-01-02
Authors: Anghela Z Paredes; J Madison Hyer; Elizabeth Palmer; Maryam B Lustberg; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Deshka Foster; Mohammad F Shaikh; Elizabeth Gleeson; Blake D Babcock; Daniel Ringold; Wilbur B Bowne Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 2.947