Alizeh Abbas1, J Madison Hyer2, Timothy M Pawlik1. 1. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and the James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and the James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. tim.pawlik@osumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Integration of palliative care services into the surgical treatment plan is important for holistic patient care. We sought to examine the association between patient race/ethnicity and county-level vulnerability relative to patterns of hospice utilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medicare Standard Analytic Files were used to identify patients undergoing lung, esophageal, pancreatic, colon, or rectal cancer surgery between 2013 and 2017. Data were merged with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's social vulnerability index (SVI). Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with overall hospice utilization among deceased individuals. RESULTS: A total of 54,256 Medicare beneficiaries underwent lung (n = 16,645, 30.7%), esophageal (n = 1427, 2.6%), pancreatic (n = 6183, 11.4%), colon (n = 26,827, 49.4%), or rectal (n = 3174, 5.9%) cancer resection. Median patient age was 76 years (IQR 71-82 years), and 28,887 patients (53.2%) were male; the majority of individuals were White (91.1%, n = 49,443), while a smaller subset was Black or Latino (racial/ethnic minority: n = 4813, 8.9%). Overall, 35,416 (65.3%) patients utilized hospice services prior to death. Median SVI was 52.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 30.3-71.2]. White patients were more likely to utilize hospice care compared with minority patients (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.31, p < 0.001). Unlike White patients, there was reduced odds of hospice utilization (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) and early hospice initiation (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97) as SVI increased among minority patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients residing in counties with high social vulnerability were less likely to be enrolled in hospice care at the time of death, as well as be less likely to initiate hospice care early. The effects of increasing social vulnerability on hospice utilization were more profound among minority patients.
BACKGROUND: Integration of palliative care services into the surgical treatment plan is important for holistic patient care. We sought to examine the association between patient race/ethnicity and county-level vulnerability relative to patterns of hospice utilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medicare Standard Analytic Files were used to identify patients undergoing lung, esophageal, pancreatic, colon, or rectal cancer surgery between 2013 and 2017. Data were merged with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's social vulnerability index (SVI). Logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with overall hospice utilization among deceased individuals. RESULTS: A total of 54,256 Medicare beneficiaries underwent lung (n = 16,645, 30.7%), esophageal (n = 1427, 2.6%), pancreatic (n = 6183, 11.4%), colon (n = 26,827, 49.4%), or rectal (n = 3174, 5.9%) cancer resection. Median patient age was 76 years (IQR 71-82 years), and 28,887 patients (53.2%) were male; the majority of individuals were White (91.1%, n = 49,443), while a smaller subset was Black or Latino (racial/ethnic minority: n = 4813, 8.9%). Overall, 35,416 (65.3%) patients utilized hospice services prior to death. Median SVI was 52.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 30.3-71.2]. White patients were more likely to utilize hospice care compared with minority patients (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.31, p < 0.001). Unlike White patients, there was reduced odds of hospice utilization (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) and early hospice initiation (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97) as SVI increased among minority patients. CONCLUSIONS:Patients residing in counties with high social vulnerability were less likely to be enrolled in hospice care at the time of death, as well as be less likely to initiate hospice care early. The effects of increasing social vulnerability on hospice utilization were more profound among minority patients.
Authors: Kathleen M Fairfield; Kimberly M Murray; Heidi R Wierman; Paul K J Han; Sarah Hallen; Susan Miesfeldt; Edward L Trimble; Joan L Warren; Craig C Earle Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Elizabeth J Lilley; Kashif T Khan; Fabian M Johnston; Ana Berlin; Angela M Bader; Anne C Mosenthal; Zara Cooper Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Gopal K Singh; Gem P Daus; Michelle Allender; Christine T Ramey; Elijah K Martin; Chrisp Perry; Andrew A De Los Reyes; Ivy P Vedamuthu Journal: Int J MCH AIDS Date: 2017
Authors: Anna Kimberly Miller; Jennifer Catherine Gordon; Jacqueline W Curtis; Jayakrishnan Ajayakumar; Fredrick R Schumacher; Stefanie Avril Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 4.614