Literature DB >> 35041076

A positive genetic selection for transmembrane domain mutations in HRD1 underscores the importance of Hrd1 complex integrity during ERAD.

Kunio Nakatsukasa1, Sylvia Wigge2, Yuki Takano3, Tomoyuki Kawarasaki3, Takumi Kamura4, Jeffrey L Brodsky5.   

Abstract

Misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are retrotranslocated to the cytosol for ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. During this process, known as ER-associated degradation (ERAD), the ER-embedded Hrd1 ubiquitin ligase plays a central role in recognizing, ubiquitinating, and retrotranslocating scores of lumenal and integral membrane proteins. To better define the mechanisms underlying Hrd1 function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, several model substrates have been developed. One substrate is Sec61-2, a temperature sensitive allele of the Sec61 translocation channel. Cells expressing Sec61-2 grow at 25 °C because the protein is stable, but sec61-2 yeast are inviable at 38 °C because the mutated protein is degraded in a Hrd1-dependent manner. Therefore, deleting HRD1 stabilizes Sec61-2 and hence sec61-2hrd1∆ double mutants are viable at 38 °C. This unique phenotype allowed us to perform a non-biased screen for loss-of-function alleles in HRD1. Based on its importance in mediating substrate retrotranslocation, the screen was also developed to focus on mutations in sequences encoding Hrd1's transmembrane-rich domain. Ultimately, a group of recessive mutations was identified in HRD1, including an ensemble of destabilizing mutations that resulted in the delivery of Hrd1 to the ERAD pathway. A more stable mutant resided in a buried transmembrane domain, yet the Hrd1 complex was disrupted in yeast expressing this mutant. Together, these data confirm the importance of Hrd1 complex integrity during ERAD, suggest that allosteric interactions between transmembrane domains regulate Hrd1 complex formation, and provide the field with new tools to define the dynamic interactions between ERAD components during substrate retrotranslocation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degradation; E3 ubiquitin ligase; ER quality control; Endoplasmic reticulum; Proteasome; Ubiquitination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35041076      PMCID: PMC9036396          DOI: 10.1007/s00294-022-01227-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genet        ISSN: 0172-8083            Impact factor:   2.695


  53 in total

1.  Distinct ubiquitin-ligase complexes define convergent pathways for the degradation of ER proteins.

Authors:  Pedro Carvalho; Veit Goder; Tom A Rapoport
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  A RING-H2 finger motif is essential for the function of Der3/Hrd1 in endoplasmic reticulum associated protein degradation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J Bordallo; D H Wolf
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-04-09       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 3.  The ubiquitin-proteasome system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Daniel Finley; Helle D Ulrich; Thomas Sommer; Peter Kaiser
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  INSIG: a broadly conserved transmembrane chaperone for sterol-sensing domain proteins.

Authors:  Isabelle Flury; Renee Garza; Alexander Shearer; Johanna Rosen; Stephen Cronin; Randolph Y Hampton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Der3p/Hrd1p is required for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of misfolded lumenal and integral membrane proteins.

Authors:  J Bordallo; R K Plemper; A Finger; D H Wolf
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Heterologous expression and functional analysis of the F-box protein Ucc1 from other yeast species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kunio Nakatsukasa; Tomoyuki Kawarasaki; Akihiko Moriyama
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Misfolded membrane proteins are specifically recognized by the transmembrane domain of the Hrd1p ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Brian K Sato; Daniel Schulz; Phong H Do; Randolph Y Hampton
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Proteostatic Tactics in the Strategy of Sterol Regulation.

Authors:  Margaret A Wangeline; Nidhi Vashistha; Randolph Y Hampton
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 13.827

9.  Autoubiquitination of the Hrd1 Ligase Triggers Protein Retrotranslocation in ERAD.

Authors:  Ryan D Baldridge; Tom A Rapoport
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  A stalled retrotranslocation complex reveals physical linkage between substrate recognition and proteasomal degradation during ER-associated degradation.

Authors:  Kunio Nakatsukasa; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Takumi Kamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Viruses Hijack ERAD to Regulate Their Replication and Propagation.

Authors:  Linke Zou; Xinyan Wang; Feifan Zhao; Keke Wu; Xiaowen Li; Zhaoyao Li; Yuwan Li; Wenxian Chen; Sen Zeng; Xiaodi Liu; Mingqiu Zhao; Lin Yi; Shuangqi Fan; Jinding Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 6.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.