Literature DB >> 35040929

massNet: integrated processing and classification of spatially resolved mass spectrometry data using deep learning for rapid tumor delineation.

Walid M Abdelmoula1,2, Sylwia A Stopka1,3, Elizabeth C Randall3, Michael Regan1, Jeffrey N Agar4, Jann N Sarkaria5, William M Wells3,6, Tina Kapur3, Nathalie Y R Agar1,3,7.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) provides rich biochemical information in a label-free manner and therefore holds promise to substantially impact current practice in disease diagnosis. However, the complex nature of MSI data poses computational challenges in its analysis. The complexity of the data arises from its large size, high dimensionality, and spectral non-linearity. Preprocessing, including peak picking, has been used to reduce raw data complexity, however peak picking is sensitive to parameter selection that, perhaps prematurely, shapes the downstream analysis for tissue classification and ensuing biological interpretation.
RESULTS: We propose a deep learning model, massNet, that provides the desired qualities of scalability, non-linearity, and speed in MSI data analysis. This deep learning model was used, without prior preprocessing and peak picking, to classify MSI data from a mouse brain harboring a patient-derived tumor. The massNet architecture established automatically learning of predictive features, and automated methods were incorporated to identify peaks with potential for tumor delineation. The model's performance was assessed using cross-validation, and the results demonstrate higher accuracy and a substantial gain in speed compared to the established classical machine learning method, support vector machine.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/wabdelmoula/massNet. AVAILABILITY OF DATA: The data underlying this article are available in the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) Metabolomics Workbench under project id (PR001292) with http://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8Q70T. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) (2022). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35040929      PMCID: PMC8963284          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  44 in total

1.  Integrating histology and imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Pierre Chaurand; Sarah A Schwartz; Dean Billheimer; Baogang J Xu; Anna Crecelius; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Inclusive sharing of mass spectrometry imaging data requires a converter for all.

Authors:  Alan M Race; Iain B Styles; Josephine Bunch
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Imaging mass spectrometry data reduction: automated feature identification and extraction.

Authors:  Liam A McDonnell; Alexandra van Remoortere; Nico de Velde; René J M van Zeijl; André M Deelder
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Spatial segmentation of imaging mass spectrometry data with edge-preserving image denoising and clustering.

Authors:  Theodore Alexandrov; Michael Becker; Sren-Oliver Deininger; Günther Ernst; Liane Wehder; Markus Grasmair; Ferdinand von Eggeling; Herbert Thiele; Peter Maass
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Liam A McDonnell; Ron M A Heeren
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 6.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Chemo-informatic strategy for imaging mass spectrometry-based hyperspectral profiling of lipid signatures in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kirill A Veselkov; Reza Mirnezami; Nicole Strittmatter; Robert D Goldin; James Kinross; Abigail V M Speller; Tigran Abramov; Emrys A Jones; Ara Darzi; Elaine Holmes; Jeremy K Nicholson; Zoltan Takats
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniel P Donnelly; Catherine M Rawlins; Caroline J DeHart; Luca Fornelli; Luis F Schachner; Ziqing Lin; Jennifer L Lippens; Krishna C Aluri; Richa Sarin; Bifan Chen; Carter Lantz; Wonhyeuk Jung; Kendall R Johnson; Antonius Koller; Jeremy J Wolff; Iain D G Campuzano; Jared R Auclair; Alexander R Ivanov; Julian P Whitelegge; Ljiljana Paša-Tolić; Julia Chamot-Rooke; Paul O Danis; Lloyd M Smith; Yury O Tsybin; Joseph A Loo; Ying Ge; Neil L Kelleher; Jeffrey N Agar
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 9.  MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: statistical data analysis and current computational challenges.

Authors:  Theodore Alexandrov
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Understanding the characteristics of mass spectrometry data through the use of simulation.

Authors:  Kevin R Coombes; John M Koomen; Keith A Baggerly; Jeffrey S Morris; Ryuji Kobayashi
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2005
View more
  2 in total

1.  Identifying multicellular spatiotemporal organization of cells with SpaceFlow.

Authors:  Honglei Ren; Benjamin L Walker; Zixuan Cang; Qing Nie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Multi-Class Cancer Subtyping in Salivary Gland Carcinomas with MALDI Imaging and Deep Learning.

Authors:  David Pertzborn; Christoph Arolt; Günther Ernst; Oliver J Lechtenfeld; Jan Kaesler; Daniela Pelzel; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Ferdinand von Eggeling; Franziska Hoffmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.