| Literature DB >> 35039945 |
Veer Singh Gautam1,2, Arti Singh1, Puja Kumari1, Jay Hind Nishad1, Jitendra Kumar1, Monika Yadav1, Rajnish Bharti1, Priyanka Prajapati1, Ravindra Nath Kharwar3.
Abstract
Since endophytic fungi are pivotal sources of various bioactive natural compounds, the present study is aimed to investigate the antioxidant compounds of the endophytic fungus Nigrospora sphaerica isolated from a pantropical weed, Euphorbia hirta L. The fungus was fermented in four different media and each filtered broth was sequentially extracted in various solvents. Crude extracts collected from different solvents were subjected to phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity. The total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) were maximal in ethyl acetate crude extract (EtOAcE) of endophyte fermented in potato dextrose broth (PDB) medium (77.74 ± 0.046mgGAE/g and 230.59 ± 2.0 mgRE/g) with the highest 96.80% antioxidant activity. However, TPC and TFC were absent in hexane extract of Czapek Dox broth (CDB) medium exhibiting the lowest 4.63 ± 2.75% activity. The EtOAcE (PDB) showed a positive correlation between TFC and antiradical activity (R2 = 0.762; P < 0.05), whereas a high positive correlation was noticed between TPC and antioxidant activity (R2 = 0.989; P < 0.05). Furthermore, to determine the antioxidant activity, EtOAcE (PDB) was subjected to TLC bioautography-based partial purification, while GC/MS analysis of the partial purified extract was done to confirm the presence of phenolics along with antioxidant compounds that resulted in the detection of 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol (13.83%), a phenolic compound accountable for the antioxidant potential. Conclusively, N. sphaerica is a potential candidate for natural antioxidant.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; Compounds purification; GC–MS analysis; N. sphaerica; Phytochemical analysis; TLC bioautography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35039945 PMCID: PMC8763303 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02650-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Microbiol ISSN: 0302-8933 Impact factor: 2.552
Fig. 1Schematic diagram showing sequential extraction
Qualitative phytochemical analysis of sequentially extracted crude extract of N. sphaerica fermented in various culture media
| Solvents/Media | Phenolics | Flavonoids | Terpenoids | Alkaloids | Glycosides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethyl acetate | |||||
| PDB | + + + + + | + + | + | + + + | – |
| CDB | – | + | – | – | – |
| CDYEB | + + | + | + | + | + |
| MEB | + | + | + | + + | – |
| SDB | – | – | – | – | – |
| Chloroform | |||||
| PDB | – | + | + + | – | + |
| CDB | – | – | + + + | – | + |
| CDYEB | – | – | – | – | + |
| MEB | – | – | – | – | + |
| SDB | – | – | + | – | + |
| Methanol | |||||
| PDB | – | + + + + | – | – | – |
| CDB | – | – | – | – | – |
| CDYEB | – | – | – | – | – |
| MEB | – | – | – | – | – |
| SDB | – | – | – | – | – |
| Hexane | |||||
| PDB | – | – | + | – | – |
| CDB | – | – | – | – | – |
| CDYEB | – | – | – | – | – |
| MEB | – | – | – | – | – |
| SDB | – | – | – | – | – |
– Not detected
Total phenolic, flavonoid contents and DPPH scavenging potential of different crude extracts of N. sphaerica
| Media/ | Total phenolics (mg GAE/ g crude extract) | Total flavonoids (mg RE/g crude extract) | DPPH scavenging activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethyl acetate | |||
| PDB | 77.74 ± 0.046a | 230.59 ± 2.00a | 96.80 ± 0.24a |
| CDB | 22.09 ± 0.06e | 88.73 ± 2.31d | 21.29 ± .04e |
| CDYEB | 53.04 ± 0.04b | 123.53 ± 3.06c | 68.69 ± 0.75b |
| SDB | 33.32 ± 0.03d | 31.19 ± 3.06e | 33.32 ± 0.24d |
| MEB | 45.06 ± 0.46c | 134.23 ± 4.01b | 50.86 ± 0.43c |
| Chloroform | |||
| PDB | 3.32 ± 0.03d | – | 29.85 ± 0.66b |
| CDB | 7.43 ± 0.06c | – | 35.79 ± 0.24a |
| CDYEB | 7.32 ± 0.01c | – | 35.35 ± 0.25a |
| SDB | 10.28 ± 0.03b | – | 16.22 ± 0.25d |
| MEB | 13.45 ± 0.06a | – | 23.32 ± 0.24c |
| Methanol | |||
| PDB | 34.88 ± 0.03b | 24.90 ± 3.06b | 85.50 ± 0.25a |
| CDB | 2.10 ± 0.01d | 15.54 ± 2.00c | 21.15 ± 0.66c |
| CDYEB | 14.88 ± 0.01c | – | 62.45 ± 0.24b |
| SDB | 52.26 ± 0.03a | 54.34 ± 3.06a | 86.37 ± 0.50a |
| MEB | 14.77 ± 0.30c | – | 87.82 ± 0.43a |
| Hexane | |||
| PDB | – | 44.98 ± 3.06a | 72.60 ± 0.60c |
| CDB | – | – | 4.63 ± 2.75e |
| CDYEB | – | – | 75.35 ± 0.25b |
| SDB | – | 6.18 ± 3.06b | 78.83 ± 0.25a |
| MEB | – | – | 61.58 ± 0.24d |
Data are expressed as mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. Means within each column with different letters (a–e) differ significantly (P < 0.05); –not detected
Fig. 2TLC plates of ethyl acetate extract (PDB) of Nigrospora sphaerica visualized under visible light before and after derivatization (0.2 Mm DPPH solutions), UV light at 254 nm (green panel) and 366 nm (blue panel)
Fig. 3a ABTS free radical inhibiting potential of purified ethyl acetate extract (PDB) of Nigrospora sphaerica and positive control using different concentrations (12.5–400 µg) and b DPPH free radical scavenging potential of purified ethyl acetate extract (PDB) of N. sphaerica and positive control using different concentrations (12.5–400 µg)
Fig. 4a Chromatogram of GC–MS analysis, b TLC bioautography-based purification of compounds, c presence of different chemical groups in the partial purified ethyl acetate extract (PDB) and d depicting chemical structure of 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol
Phytochemical-compounds present in the TLC based purified extract of EtOAcE (PDB) determined by GC–MS analysis
| RT | Name of compound | MFa | MWb | % Area | Category | Biological activity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.65 | 1-Undecanol | C11H24O | 172.3 | 0.73 | Fatty alcohol | Antibacterial activity | Togashi et al. ( |
| 12.11 | 6-Dodecene | C12H24 | 168.31 | 2.68 | Unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon | – | – |
| 13.86 | 3-Isopropoxy-1,1,1,7,7,7-hexamethyl-3,5,5-tris(trimethylsiloxy) tetrasiloxane | C18H52O7Si7 | 577.2 | 9.67 | Alkane | Like CNS stimulant | Khalid et al. ( |
| 14.39 | 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | C14H22O | 206.32 | 13.83 | Alkylated phenol | Antioxidant and cytotoxic activity | Zhao et al. ( |
| 15.13 | Cyclotridecane | C13H26 | 182.35 | 4.56 | Alkane | – | _ |
| 16.23 | 2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3TMS derivative | C16H30O4Si3 | 370.66 | 6.04 | Fatty acid | – | – |
| 17.81 | Heptacos-1-ene | C27H54 | 378.7 | 9.8 | Alkene | – | – |
| 19.14 | Phthalic acid, 5-methylhex-2-yl isobutyl ester | C19H28O4 | 320.4 | 6.54 | Ester | – | – |
| 20.23 | 9-Hexacosene | C26H52 | 364.7 | 14.83 | Alkene | Analgesic, Antiinflammatory, Antinociceptive | Kuriuki et al. ( |
| 21.31 | Vinyl 2-ethylhexanoate | C10H18O2 | 170.25 | 7.06 | Ester | – | – |
| 22.44 | n-Tetracosanol-1 | C24H50O | 354.7 | 9.87 | Fatty alcohol | Anticancer | Vergara et al. ( |
| 24.46 | Octatriacontyl pentafluoropropionate | C41H77F5O2 | 697 | 6.55 | Hydrocarbons | Anti covid 19 | H Elwakil et al. ( |
| 26.33 | 17-Pentatriacontene | C35H70 | 490.9 | 7.85 | Hydrocarbons | Anticancer Antibacterial | Kumar et al. ( |
aMolecular formula
bMolecular weight