Literature DB >> 35038798

[Comparative study of transosseous suture and suture anchor technique in medial patellofemoral ligament double bundle reconstruction].

Rui Sun1, Mingyi Duan1, Xunqi Liu1, Siqi Chen1, Junyuan Wang1, Hangzhou Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of transosseous suture in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) double bundle reconstruction.
METHODS: The clinical data of 75 patients with recurrent patella dislocation who met the selection criteria between January 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were treated with MPFL double bundle reconstruction, and divided into study group (39 cases, using new transosseous suture technique) and control group (36 cases, using traditional suture anchor fixation) depending on the intraoperative fixation technique. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, affected knee side, preoperative tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, Insall-Salvati ratio, knee range of motion, Kujala score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, congruence angle, and tilt angle between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Kujala score, IKDC score, and knee range of motion were used to evaluate the functional improvement of patients before and after operation. The congruence angle and tilt angle were measured on X-ray films.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 24-36 months, with an average of 29.4 months. There was no complication such as incision infection, fat liquefaction, patellar redislocation, and prepatellar pain during follow-up. At last follow-up, the Kujala score, IKDC score, knee range of motion, congruence angle, and tilt angle of two groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The application of suture anchor or transosseous suture to complete MPFL double bundle reconstruction can restore patellar stability, and there is no significant difference in the short-term effectiveness between them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patella dislocation; fixation technique; medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction; suture anchor; transosseous suture

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35038798      PMCID: PMC8844617          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202108010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  15 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of complications and failures associated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation.

Authors:  Jay N Shah; Jennifer S Howard; David C Flanigan; Robert H Brophy; James L Carey; Christian Lattermann
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  [Arthroscopic anatomical medical patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to treat recurrent patellar dislocation].

Authors:  Liangjun Li; Ke Chou; Zhiyong He; Jianliang Deng; Feng Shen; Guanghua Lei
Journal:  Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2015-11

3.  The modified semi-tunnel bone bridge technique achieved statistically better knee function than the suture anchor technique.

Authors:  Gang Ji; Haoyu Wang; Xiaoqing Su; Jinliang Wang; Fei Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of three patellar fixation techniques for MPFL reconstruction: Load to failure did not differ but interference screw stabilization was stiffer than suture anchor and suture-knot fixation.

Authors:  Vasilios A Raoulis; Aristidis Zibis; Maria Dimitra Chiotelli; Alexis T Kermanidis; Konstantinos Banios; Philipp Schuster; Michael E Hantes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Traumatic Patellar Dislocation without Patellar Fixation.

Authors:  Samir Abdulrazik Ibrahim; Emad Mureed Shohdy; Sami Abdulghaffar Ramadan; Abdulrahman Khalid Almisfer; Wael Shoabe Abdulsattar; Sherif Khairat
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Dennis Lee; Daniel Stinner; Hassan Mir
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Patellar Redislocation Rates and Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Suture Anchor Versus Double Transpatellar Tunnel Fixation.

Authors:  Jae-Won Heo; Kyung-Han Ro; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Biomechanical Comparison of All-Soft Suture Anchor Single-Row vs Double-Row Bridging Construct for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy.

Authors:  Eric Lakey; Pam Kumparatana; Daniel K Moon; Joseph Morales; Sophia Elizabeth Anderson; Todd Baldini; Hélder Pereira; Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Single- versus double-bundle patellar graft insertion for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Andromahi Trivellas; Giorgia Colarossi; Jörg Eschweiler; Markus Tingart; Björn Rath
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Patellar fixation graft via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques during isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Arne Driessen; Valentin Quack; Hanno Schenker; Markus Tingart; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.