| Literature DB >> 35038245 |
Jianzhe Luo1,2, Yusheng Li3,4, Miao He3,4, Ziming Wang1,2, Chengyu Li1,2, Di Liu1,2, Jie An1,2, Wenqing Xie3,4, Yuqiong He3,4, Wenfeng Xiao3,4, Zhou Li1,2, Zhong Lin Wang1,2,5,6, Wei Tang1,2,7.
Abstract
As the world population structure has already exhibited an inevitable trend of aging, technical advances that can provide better eldercare are highly desired. Knee osteoarthritis, one of the most common age-associated diseases, can be effectively treated via total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, patients are suffering from the recovery process due to inconvenience in post-hospital treatment. Here, a portable, modular, and wearable brace for self-assessment of TKA patients' rehabilitation is reported. This system mainly consists of a force transducer for isometric muscle strength measurement and an active angle sensor for knee bending detection. Clinical experiments on TKA patients demonstrate the feasibility and significance of the system. Specifically, via brace-based personalized healthcare, the TKA patients' rehabilitation process is quantified in terms of myodynamia, and a definite rehabilitation enhancement is obtained. Additionally, new indicators, that is, isometric muscle test score, for evaluating TKA rehabilitation are proposed. It is anticipated that, as the cloud database is employed and more rehabilitation data are collected in the near future, the brace system can not only facilitate rehabilitations of TKA patients, but also improve life quality for geriatric patients and open a new space for remote artificial intelligence medical engineering.Entities:
Keywords: personalized healthcare; rehabilitation; self-powered sensors; total knee arthroplasty; triboelectric nanogenerators
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35038245 PMCID: PMC8922106 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the rehabilitation brace system. a) A perspective view of a brace with modular device for measuring isometric myodynamia and joint ROM (range of motion). The brace system includes i) a force gauge; ii) telescopic rod corresponding to brace bending angle of 30°, 50°, 60°, 90°; iii) quick release buckle for telescopic rod fixation and disassemble; iv) data processing circuit of force gauge for isometric muscle measurement; v) active angle sensor with resolution of 1°; vi) data processing circuit of angle sensor for joint movement. b) Sketches of data collecting and transmitting. c) Measurement performing.
Figure 2Characterization of the strength measurement module. Relationship between torque and force is explored through a precise concentric transmission. a) Schematic of the configuration of a transmission system for calibrating the strength module. The direction of torque transmission is shown by red arrow. b) Flow chart demonstrating the key steps of the signal acquisition and visualization. Once the linear motor slides, rotations of shaft and arm will be triggered, respectively. At the meanwhile, two force gauges will detect the force applied on the brace through leg. c) Measured relationship among real‐time extension and flexion forces and torque in the test system. d) Calculated torque/force ratios at 30°, 50°, 60°, 90° under one‐telescopic‐rod condition and two‐telescopic‐rod condition. e,f) Medical convalescent information derived from acquired isometric muscle strength test.
Figure 3The response of brace angle measurement module. Schematic illustration of a) active range of movement test and b) TENG liquid‐enhanced angle sensor with interface liquid enhancement c) Transferred charge of a TENG angle sensor in air and with interface liquid lubrication. d) Open‐circuit voltage of TENG angle sensor in air and with interface liquid lubrication. e) SEM images results of Kapton film surface after 100 000 cycles in air and with interface liquid lubrication (scale bar, 100 µm). f) The real‐time angle signals, angle speed, and photos during the active range of movement test.
Figure 4Clinical analysis of TKA patients’ rehabilitation through brace system. a) Dual energy X‐ray body composition analysis images and data; as well as X‐ray images of a patient before TKA. b) X‐ray images of the patient after TKA. c) Composition of KOOS and KSS scores before and after TKA: the day performing TKA is regarded as 0, −1 represents the day before TKA and 30 represents the 30th day after TKA. d) Isometric muscle tests of the patient during one month (extension peak force) e) 30° extension peak force and active range of motion of the patient before TKA and one month after TKA. f) Rehabilitation indicators comparison between pre‐operation and post‐operation. g) Isometric muscle tests data of 10 healthy participants. A group of patients’ 60° isometric muscle tests in one‐month scale: h) Extension peak force and i) hamstring to quadriceps (H/Q) ratio.
Figure 5Brace‐based personalized medicine contributing to convalescent. a) Schematic images of brace system's effect on TKA patients over the rehabilitation period. b) Photo of exercise with brace. c) Myodynamia data of control and intervention group under 30 extensions, 30 flexions, 60 extensions, as well as 60 flexion isometric tests. d) ROM of controlled group and intervention group tested on day 1, day 3, and day 30. e,f) Normal distribution of force from 60 extension isometric test. g) Components of IMTS and score assignment principal. h) IMTS scores of controlled group and intervention group tested on day 1, 3 30. i,j) rehabilitation indicators of controlled group and intervention group.