Literature DB >> 35038232

Atomistic Engineering of Phonons in Functional Oxide Heterostructures.

Seung Gyo Jeong1, Ambrose Seo2, Woo Seok Choi1.   

Abstract

Engineering of phonons, that is, collective lattice vibrations in crystals, is essential for manipulating physical properties of materials such as thermal transport, electron-phonon interaction, confinement of lattice vibration, and optical polarization. Most approaches to phonon-engineering have been largely limited to the high-quality heterostructures of III-V compound semiconductors. Yet, artificial engineering of phonons in a variety of materials with functional properties, such as complex oxides, will yield unprecedented applications of coherent tunable phonons in future quantum acoustic devices. In this study, artificial engineering of phonons in the atomic-scale SrRuO3 /SrTiO3 superlattices is demonstrated, wherein tunable phonon modes are observed via confocal Raman spectroscopy. In particular, the coherent superlattices led to the backfolding of acoustic phonon dispersion, resulting in zone-folded acoustic phonons in the THz frequency domain. The frequencies can be largely tuned from 1 to 2 THz via atomic-scale precision thickness control. In addition, a polar optical phonon originating from the local inversion symmetry breaking in the artificial oxide superlattices is observed, exhibiting emergent functionality. The approach of atomic-scale heterostructuring of complex oxides will vastly expand material systems for quantum acoustic devices, especially with the viability of functionality integration.
© 2022 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atomic-scale epitaxy; confocal Raman spectroscopy; engineering of phonon; synthetic oxide crystal; terahertz acoustic wave

Year:  2022        PMID: 35038232      PMCID: PMC8895146          DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)        ISSN: 2198-3844            Impact factor:   16.806


Introduction

Artificial engineering of quantized lattice vibrations, that is, phonons, is a fascinating subject in both fundamental research and practical applications.[ , , , , , , , , , , , ] It involves the creation and manipulation of new phonon modes through the synthesis of artificial crystals such as nanostructures of heterostructures with dissimilar materials. By manipulating the phonon dispersion, the group velocity, electric polarization, and density of states of the phonons could be effectively controlled.[ ] Modulations of low‐dimensional artificial nanostructures and crystals provide unique opportunities for controlling phonon and its related applications.[ , , , ] In particular, these approaches will pave the way for quantum acoustic applications such as quantum Bragg mirrors and cavities,[ , , ] quantum acoustic memory and transducers,[ ] microwave‐optical converters,[ ] quantum amplifiers,[ ] and circuit quantum acoustodynamics.[ ] The quantized ground state phonon is envisaged as a potential resonator for managing quantum information, for example, superconducting quantum bits,[ ] implying that facile engineering of the low‐frequency phonons is highly necessary. However, most studies on artificial phonon engineering have been exclusively focused on compound semiconductor heterostructures,[ , , , ] partially owing to their excellent crystalline qualities. Complex perovskite oxide thin films and heterostructures provide accessible controllability of functional phenomena, which are closely associated with phonon dynamics.[ , , , , , , , , , , ] Modulation of lattice structures by epitaxial strain causes a substantial shift in phonon wavelength.[ , ] Adjustable soft‐mode phonons can further lead to an enhanced dielectric constant and emergence of ferroelectricity in perovskite oxides.[ , ] Superlattices composed of perovskite oxides have also been shown to systematically reduce the thermal conductivity or enhance electron‐phonon coupling for thermoelectric purposes.[ , ] Last but not least, phonon excitation energy in perovskite oxides has similar values with various quasiparticles including plasmons, excitons, phasons, magnons, and skyrmions, representing a possible correlation to the phonon dynamics.[ ] Both optical and acoustic phonons can promote intriguing phonon‐related phenomena in perovskite oxide heterostructures, as shown in Figure  . i) First, artificial superlattice structures can break the local inversion symmetry.[ , , ] For example, the inversion symmetry is broken from the perspective of the interfacial gray octahedral layers shown in Figure 1a, which might induce a polar optical (PO) phonon.[ ] Because of the absence of inversion symmetry, such phonons are intrinsically polar. ii) Second, acoustic phonon dispersion can be controlled by the supercell periodicity of the superlattice. The supercell structure induces backfolding of the phonon dispersion from that of the bulk, leading to a reduced Brillouin zone and tunable zone‐folded acoustic (ZA) phonons.
Figure 1

Phonon engineering in artificial oxide superlattices. a) Schematic representation of the emergent phonons in atomically designed oxide superlattices. i) Artificial superlattice structure realizes local symmetry breaking at the interfacial layers, denoted by the crosses. As a result, new PO phonon modes can be stabilized and observed. ii) The supercell structure leads to backfolding of the phonon dispersion, activating a tunable THz excitation of the ZA phonon modes. b) Schematic representation of the evolution of ZA phonon modes in SRO/STO superlattices when d SL = 10 d STO. The inset shows the atomic u.c. of STO with d STO. c) Estimated acoustic phonon dispersion of [6|4] superlattice with d SL at low photon energy region (red dotted box region in (b)). The vertical red line shows the q value of probing laser with a wavelength of 632.8 nm.

Phonon engineering in artificial oxide superlattices. a) Schematic representation of the emergent phonons in atomically designed oxide superlattices. i) Artificial superlattice structure realizes local symmetry breaking at the interfacial layers, denoted by the crosses. As a result, new PO phonon modes can be stabilized and observed. ii) The supercell structure leads to backfolding of the phonon dispersion, activating a tunable THz excitation of the ZA phonon modes. b) Schematic representation of the evolution of ZA phonon modes in SRO/STO superlattices when d SL = 10 d STO. The inset shows the atomic u.c. of STO with d STO. c) Estimated acoustic phonon dispersion of [6|4] superlattice with d SL at low photon energy region (red dotted box region in (b)). The vertical red line shows the q value of probing laser with a wavelength of 632.8 nm. Figure 1b schematically shows the phonon dispersion of a bulk material (SrTiO3, STO) and a superlattice (SrRuO3/SrTiO3, SRO/STO superlattice). The phonon frequency of STO is given by, ω ≅ sin(kd STO/2), where d STO and k = π/d are the lattice constants of the bulk STO in the real and reciprocal spaces, respectively (black curve in Figure 1b). In contrast, the value of k for a superlattice with a supercell periodicity (d SL) of, for example, 10 d STO, decreases by 10 times, and equivalent backfolding of the Brillouin zone appears (orange curves in Figure 1b). This leads to Raman‐active zone‐center acoustic phonons near the Γ‐point (Figure 1c). The ZA phonon dispersion of the superlattice with the reduced Brillouin zone, shown in Figure 1c, is estimated using Rytov approximation as[ ] where d 1 and d 2 are the thicknesses and υ s1 and υ s2 are the sound velocities of the two distinct layers within the superlattices. The parameter α is defined as α = υ s2 ρ 2 / υ s1 ρ 1, where ρ 1 and ρ 2 are the densities of the two materials, respectively. If each atomically thin layer within the superlattices well‐preserve its sound velocity and density, the Rytov model would be also valid for atomically thin heterostructures. As an example, we modeled the six‐ and four‐unit cell (u.c. ∼0.4 nm) layers of the SRO and STO layers within a superlattice, that is, [6|4] superlattice (d SL = 10d STO), and used the reported υ and ρ values of the individual SRO and STO materials.[ , , , ] The phonon dispersion of the superlattice exhibits the measurable peak frequencies (ω SL) of ZA phonons at ∼60 cm−1 (∼1.8 THz) with a laser wavelength of 632.8 nm for Raman spectroscopy. Furthermore, it shows a tunable ω SL via the atomically designed supercell thickness (d 1 + d 2) of the superlattices. In this study, we report the atomic‐scale precision modulation of phonon behavior (both optical and acoustic) using artificial oxide superlattices. We chose the SRO/STO superlattices as a model system to realize artificial phonon engineering. STO is an incipient ferroelectric, where the PO phonons are closely associated with its quantum paraelectric phenomena.[ , ] The atomically sharp interfaces and surfaces of the SRO/STO superlattices led to the facile engineering of the phonons.[ , , , , , ] The superlattices successfully realized THz excitations of ZA phonon modes and largely modulated the excitation frequency up to 2 THz via atomic‐scale epitaxy. Furthermore, the superlattice structure exhibited a PO phonon mode, which was not observed in either bulk STO or SRO, indicating local inversion symmetry breaking. Our result demonstrates a novel route for the artificial engineering of functional phonons in complex oxide heterostructures, which would be useful for designing optical transducers in the THz region, in conjunction with the piezoelectricity and deformation potential effects.[ , ] Furthermore, the THz frequency domain has tremendous potential for the development of next‐generation communication devices due to its higher data transfer rate.[ , ]

Results and Discussion

High‐Quality Epitaxial Oxide Superlattices

High‐quality epitaxial SRO/STO superlattices with systematically modulated supercell thicknesses were synthesized using pulsed laser epitaxy (Figure  –2c and Figures S1 and S2, Supporting Information). We fabricated the six‐ and y‐u.c. of SRO and STO layers with 50 repetitions on (001) STO substrates, that is, [6|y] superlattices. The number of u.c. of the superlattices was controlled utilizing a customized automatic laser pulse control system.[ , , , , ] X‐ray diffraction (XRD) θ–2θ scans showed clear superlattice peaks (±n) with Pendellösung fringes, indicating atomically well‐defined supercell structures (Figure 2a,b). The XRD reciprocal space maps, as shown in Figure 2c and Figure S1, Supporting Information, exhibited fully strained superlattices. Previous scanning tunneling electron microscopy has also shown the atomically sharp interfaces of our SRO/STO superlattices.[ , ] The coherent supercell structures, even at 50 repetitions (thicknesses of 160–280 nm), enhance the inelastic light scattering cross‐section sufficient for the experimental measurement and practical utilization of consistent phonon modes.
Figure 2

Atomic‐scale phonon modulation in SRO/STO superlattices. a,b) XRD θ–2θ measurements are shown for [6|y] with different y, grown on (001)‐oriented STO substrates. The asterisks (*) indicate the (00l) Bragg peaks of the STO substrates. The Bragg peaks of the superlattice (±n) with ∆θ represent well‐defined periodicity. c) XRD RSM is shown for [6|8] superlattice, around the (103) Bragg reflections of the STO substrate. d) Simulated phonon dispersions and e) Raman spectra are shown for ZA phonon modes of superlattices with different d SL. The spectra are measured with z(xx) scattering configuration at room temperature. The dotted lines are shown as a guide to the eye. f) Phonon dispersion for the low‐energy region is estimated using ω ph of [6|y] with different y. The solid line represents the fit of ω ph at room temperature.

Atomic‐scale phonon modulation in SRO/STO superlattices. a,b) XRD θ–2θ measurements are shown for [6|y] with different y, grown on (001)‐oriented STO substrates. The asterisks (*) indicate the (00l) Bragg peaks of the STO substrates. The Bragg peaks of the superlattice (±n) with ∆θ represent well‐defined periodicity. c) XRD RSM is shown for [6|8] superlattice, around the (103) Bragg reflections of the STO substrate. d) Simulated phonon dispersions and e) Raman spectra are shown for ZA phonon modes of superlattices with different d SL. The spectra are measured with z(xx) scattering configuration at room temperature. The dotted lines are shown as a guide to the eye. f) Phonon dispersion for the low‐energy region is estimated using ω ph of [6|y] with different y. The solid line represents the fit of ω ph at room temperature.

Tunable Zone‐Folded Acoustic Phonon Modes

Precise thickness control manifests zone‐folding of acoustic phonon modes with fine‐tuned THz frequencies. Figure 2b shows that the angular separation between the neighboring superlattice peaks (Δθ) systematically decreases with increasing y, indicating an increased d SL. The d SL was characterized by Bragg's law as where λ, n, and θ are the wavelength of the X‐ray (0.154 nm for Cu K‐α 1), the order of superlattice peaks, and the nth‐order superlattice peak position, respectively. The estimated d SL values for [6|y] superlattices with y = 2, 4, 6, and 8 are 3.16, 3.80, 4.70, and 5.48 nm, respectively, closely matching the target thickness with a deviation smaller than 0.20 nm. Figure 2d shows the acoustic phonon dispersion of SRO/STO superlattices in the mini‐Brillouin zone, modeled by Rytov approximation. With increasing y from 2 to 8, the estimated ω ph of ZA phonons is systematically reduced from 74 to 45 cm−1 (2.2 to 1.3 THz). This suggests that the d SL of the atomically well‐defined superlattice is an effective control parameter for modulating the ω ph of ZA phonons. The theoretically estimated ω ph (Figure 2d) was directly observed via confocal Raman spectroscopy, as shown in Figure 2e and Figure S3, Supporting Information. Clear Raman excitations of ZA phonons were found with the modulation of their ω ph systematically depending on y. Both Stokes and anti‐Stokes shifts of the zone‐folded phonons were observed for [6|8] superlattice, as shown in Figure S3, Supporting Information. The phonons were observed in the parallel polarizations (z(xx) or z(x’x’)) but not in the cross polarizations (Figure S3, Supporting Information), which is consistent with the previous observation of longitudinal zone‐folded phonons in traditional compound semiconductors.[ ] Further, we could fit the doublets of the zone‐folded phonons using two Lorentzian oscillators, as shown in Figure S4, Supporting Information, to extract ω ph as the average of the doublet frequencies. The experimentally observed ω ph values were in good agreement with the theoretical expectation. We summarized the ω ph values of the ZA phonons in previous studies on various heterostructures in Table  .[ , , , , , , , , , , ] Our result exclusively shows that the ω ph of atomic‐scale oxide heterostructure can be largely modulated within the THz frequency range.
Table 1

Observed ω ph of ZA phonons from previous experiments are compared to that in SRO/STO superlattice in the current study[ , , , , , , , , , , ]

Material ω ph [THz]Repetition numberGrowth methodMeasurement methodReference
InGaN/GaN0.66–1.2314Metal–organic chemical vapor depositionTime‐resolved pump‐probe experiments[51]
GaAs/AlAs0.40–0.9640Molecular beam epitaxyTime‐resolved pump‐probe experiments[7]
GaAs/AlAs0.50–0.6160 or 80Molecular beam epitaxyTime‐resolved pump‐probe experiments[52]
GaAs/AlAs0.22–0.74220Metal–organic chemical vapor depositionTime‐resolved pump‐probe experiments[53]
GaAs/AlAs0.15–0.9011Molecular beam epitaxyRaman spectroscopy[8]
InSe/hBN0.02–0.151mechanical exfoliationTime‐resolved pump‐probe experiments[54]
BaTiO3/SrTiO3 0.36–0.9030 or 50Pulse laser depositionRaman spectroscopy[15]
BaTiO3/SrTiO3 1.825Molecular‐beam epitaxyRaman spectroscopy[28]
YBa2Cu3O7−x/La1/3Ca2/3MnO3 0.26–0.3526Laser molecular beam epitaxyTime‐resolved pump‐probe experiments[55]
YBa2Cu3O7/manganite compositions0.15–0.5410Pulse laser depositionConfocal Raman spectroscopy[23]
SrTiO3/(SrRuO3 or SrIrO3)0.50–0.975 or 10Pulse laser depositionTime‐resolved pump‐probe experiments[56]
SrRuO3/SrTiO3 1.30–2.2050Atomic‐scale pulsed laser epitaxyConfocal Raman spectroscopyThis work
Observed ω ph of ZA phonons from previous experiments are compared to that in SRO/STO superlattice in the current study[ , , , , , , , , , , ] The linear relation between ω ph and reciprocal lattice spacing (π/d) further confirms the atomistic engineering of phonons in oxide superlattices, as shown in Figure 2f. The effective sound velocity, υ s, estimated from the linear relation between ω ph and π/d can provide another experimental evidence. In superlattice configurations, the effective υ s can be calculated by the weighted arithmetic average of the constituent layers within the supercell because the wavelength of the probing light is significantly larger than the u.c. length of the supercell. We obtained the effective υ s of the SRO/STO superlattices to be approximately 6.7 nm ps−1 (6700 m s−1) at room temperature using a linear fit, as shown by the gray solid line in Figure 2f. We could not observe any meaningful temperature dependence of the effective υ s (refer to blue empty circles in Figure 2f for ω ph values at 10 K), this is also consistent with the temperature independence of υ s of the SRO/STO heterostructure.[ ] Table  summarizes the reference υ s values of SRO and STO, and the effective experimental υ s values of the SRO/STO superlattices. From the density function calculations, it was predicted that υ s of bulk STO and SRO are 8.0 and 6.6 nm ps−1,[ , ] respectively, which coincide with the values of 7.9 and 6.3 nm ps−1, respectively, obtained experimentally using optical spectroscopy.[ , ] We estimated the effective υ s of the SRO/STO superlattices using the following equation, considering superlattice geometry,
Table 2

Sound velocities of SRO and STO from previous studies are compared to that in SRO/STO superlattice[ , , , ]

Material d pc [nm] υ s [nm ps−1]MethodReference
TheorySrTiO3 0.39408.0Density functional theory[29]
SrRuO3 0.39146.6Density functional theory[30]
ExperimentSrTiO3 0.39057.9Brillouin spectroscopy[31]
SrRuO3 0.39376.3Ultrasonic pulse‐echo method[32]
This workSrRuO3/SrTiO3 superlatticesSystematically controlled6.7Confocal Raman spectroscopy
Sound velocities of SRO and STO from previous studies are compared to that in SRO/STO superlattice[ , , , ] Using the values of υ s,SRO and υ s,STO (υ s of SRO and STO, respectively) from the previous theory and experiment (Table 2), the effective υ s values of 7.1 and 6.9 nm ps−1 were deduced. These values are in excellent agreement with our experimentally obtained effective υ s of 6.7 nm ps−1, as shown in Figure 2f. As υ s represents the fundamental lattice properties of a crystal, defined by υ s = (where c is the elastic modulus of the material), our results also imply that the lattice properties of atomically thin SRO and STO layers within the superlattice are well preserved.

Emergent Polar Optical Phonons in the Superlattices

Raman spectra in the higher frequency range exhibited an unexpected phonon mode for the SRO/STO superlattice (Figure  ). Figure 3a compares the Raman spectrum of [6|2] superlattice with those of the SRO single film and STO substrate at room temperature. Seven Raman peaks of the STO substrate (indicated by asterisks) originate from the second‐order Raman scattering of STO.[ ] Five Raman peaks of the SRO single film (indicated by hashes) are the known phonon modes of the SRO layer.[ ] Most of the Raman peaks of the superlattice can be interpreted as optical phonon modes of the SRO and STO layers (asterisks and hashes) or ZA phonon modes (∼66 cm−1) as discussed earlier. However, the two Raman excitations at ∼175 and ∼780 cm−1 (diamonds) cannot be explained by the conventional Raman modes of individual SRO and STO. The surface plasmon‐polariton in the SRO/STO nanoribbons revealed a similar excitation at ∼800 cm−1.[ ] Yet, our measurement configuration does not allow the surface plasmon‐polariton at the SRO/STO interfaces because the polarization of the incident laser is orthogonal to that of the surface plasmon‐polariton. Furthermore, the temperature independence of the peak frequency, as shown in Figure 3b, does not support the surface plasmon‐polariton mode.
Figure 3

Observation of polar optical phonon mode in SRO/STO superlattices. a) Raman spectra for STO substrate, SRO single film, and superlattice. The spectra are measured with z(xx) scattering configuration at room temperature. Raman intensity of SRO film is multiplied by 1/5. (We note that three phonon modes in the range of 600–750 cm−1 consistently exist in the Raman spectra of the SRO single film.) The asterisk (*), hash (#), and diamond (♦) symbols indicate the phonon assignments for STO substrate, SRO layers, and superlattices, respectively. b) Raman spectra for SRO/STO superlattice show temperature dependence of LO4 mode. c) The schematics show the polar phonon modes of TO2 and LO4 for TiO6 octahedra within STO. The arrows indicate the eigenvector of the phonon mode along [001].

Observation of polar optical phonon mode in SRO/STO superlattices. a) Raman spectra for STO substrate, SRO single film, and superlattice. The spectra are measured with z(xx) scattering configuration at room temperature. Raman intensity of SRO film is multiplied by 1/5. (We note that three phonon modes in the range of 600–750 cm−1 consistently exist in the Raman spectra of the SRO single film.) The asterisk (*), hash (#), and diamond (♦) symbols indicate the phonon assignments for STO substrate, SRO layers, and superlattices, respectively. b) Raman spectra for SRO/STO superlattice show temperature dependence of LO4 mode. c) The schematics show the polar phonon modes of TO2 and LO4 for TiO6 octahedra within STO. The arrows indicate the eigenvector of the phonon mode along [001]. Figure 3c schematically shows the possible PO phonon modes emerging in the SRO/STO superlattice, which can explain the observed Raman peaks. Whereas the original cubic STO does not host any polar phonons, TO2 and LO4 PO phonons were observed when the inversion symmetry of the system breaks via various means including epitaxial strain, oxygen isotope doping, or external electric field.[ , , , , ] Indeed, the peak frequencies of the Raman modes of the superlattices coincide with the emergent PO phonons in the STO. Moreover, the Raman spectra of the superlattice at 10 K show significant enhancements of the peaks (Figure S5, Supporting Information), further supporting the appearance of the TO2 and LO4 phonons. For atomically thin superlattices, even when the ideal global inversion symmetry is preserved, local inversion symmetry can be intrinsically broken at the interfacial layers.[ , , ] From density functional theory calculations, it can also be inferred that the inversion symmetry at SRO/STO interfaces is intrinsically broken.[ ] Thus, we believe that the two Raman peaks at ∼175 and 780 cm−1 are TO2 and LO4 polar phonons of the atomically thin STO layer, originating from the local symmetry breaking of the superlattice structure.

Conclusions

In summary, we demonstrated atomistic engineering of phonons in deliberately designed oxide heterostructures. The atomically well‐defined periodicity of the oxide superlattices led to the backfolding of acoustic phonon dispersion in the presence of zone‐folded phonons in THz frequencies, which provides important implications for acoustic Bragg mirrors and cavities for generating coherent THz phonons. Furthermore, we systematically controlled the excitation energies over 2 THz via atomic‐scale precision thickness control. We also observed the Raman excitation of the polar optical phonon of STO at room temperature in the superlattices. The atomically designed superlattices intrinsically break the local inversion symmetry, and thus, the polar optical phonon modes of atomically thin STO layers can be stabilized and visualized. Our approach offers a facile method for the artificial engineering of phonons in functional oxides for future quantum phononics.

Experimental Section

Atomic‐Scale Epitaxial Growth and Lattice Characterization

The SRO/STO superlattices were synthesized with six‐ and y‐u.c. of the SRO and STO layers, that is, [6|y] superlattice, at 750 °C in 100 mTorr of oxygen partial pressure using pulsed laser epitaxy. To enhance the Raman cross‐section of inelastic light scattering, the SRO/STO superlattices were used with 50 repetitions. Stoichiometric SRO and STO targets were ablated using a KrF laser (248 nm, IPEX868, Lightmachinery) with a laser fluence of 1.5 J cm−2 and a repetition rate of 5 Hz. X‐ray θ–2θ, off‐axis, and reciprocal space map measurements were performed using a high‐resolution PANalytical X'Pert X‐ray diffractometer. X‐ray rocking curve measurements show the excellent crystallinity of the superlattices even after 50 repetitions (Figure S2, Supporting Information).

Raman Spectroscopy

The Raman spectra of SRO/STO superlattices were obtained using a confocal micro‐Raman (Horiba LabRam HR800) spectrometer with 632.8 nm (1.96 eV) HeNe laser. Temperature‐dependent measurements were performed under vacuum using a custom‐built optical cryostat. A grating with 1800 grooves per mm and a focused beam spot with a size of 5 µm were used. The power of the laser beam was kept below 0.3 mW to avoid any laser heating effects. The z‐directional beam position was deliberately controlled to achieve optimal focus on the superlattice samples for measuring high‐quality Raman spectra using a backscattering geometry.[ ] Conventional Raman spectroscopy for wide‐bandgap insulating oxide thin‐films often required the resonant excitation of laser. However, our confocal spectroscopy allowed to probe clear Raman scattering intensities from atomically thin oxide layers.[ , ] The coherent supercell structures, up to 50 repetitions (thicknesses of 160–280 nm), also increased the inelastic light scattering cross‐section, which was sufficient for detecting the Raman spectra of the ZA phonon modes.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Supporting Information Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

1.  Coherent oscillation of zone-folded phonon modes in GaAs-AlAs superlattices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Probing nanoscale ferroelectricity by ultraviolet Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  D A Tenne; A Bruchhausen; N D Lanzillotti-Kimura; A Fainstein; R S Katiyar; A Cantarero; A Soukiassian; V Vaithyanathan; J H Haeni; W Tian; D G Schlom; K J Choi; D M Kim; C B Eom; H P Sun; X Q Pan; Y L Li; L Q Chen; Q X Jia; S M Nakhmanson; K M Rabe; X X Xi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Carrier-mediated magnetoelectricity in complex oxide heterostructures.

Authors:  James M Rondinelli; Massimiliano Stengel; Nicola A Spaldin
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12-16       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Engineering of the thermodynamic properties of bilayer graphene by atomic plane rotations: the role of the out-of-plane phonons.

Authors:  Alexandr I Cocemasov; Denis L Nika; Alexander A Balandin
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 7.790

5.  Ultrafast switching of hard X-rays.

Authors:  Peter Gaal; Daniel Schick; Marc Herzog; André Bojahr; Roman Shayduk; Jevgeni Goldshteyn; Wolfram Leitenberger; Ionela Vrejoiu; Dmitry Khakhulin; Michael Wulff; Matias Bargheer
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.616

6.  Thermal conductivity of twisted bilayer graphene.

Authors:  Hongyang Li; Hao Ying; Xiangping Chen; Denis L Nika; Alexandr I Cocemasov; Weiwei Cai; Alexander A Balandin; Shanshan Chen
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 7.790

7.  Phase Instability amid Dimensional Crossover in Artificial Oxide Crystal.

Authors:  Seung Gyo Jeong; Taewon Min; Sungmin Woo; Jiwoong Kim; Yu-Qiao Zhang; Seong Won Cho; Jaeseok Son; Young-Min Kim; Jung Hoon Han; Sungkyun Park; Hu Young Jeong; Hiromichi Ohta; Suyoun Lee; Tae Won Noh; Jaekwang Lee; Woo Seok Choi
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Ferroelectric PbTiO3/SrRuO3 superlattices with broken inversion symmetry.

Authors:  S J Callori; J Gabel; D Su; J Sinsheimer; M V Fernandez-Serra; M Dawber
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves.

Authors:  Riccardo Manenti; Anton F Kockum; Andrew Patterson; Tanja Behrle; Joseph Rahamim; Giovanna Tancredi; Franco Nori; Peter J Leek
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Atomistic Engineering of Phonons in Functional Oxide Heterostructures.

Authors:  Seung Gyo Jeong; Ambrose Seo; Woo Seok Choi
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 16.806

View more
  1 in total

1.  Atomistic Engineering of Phonons in Functional Oxide Heterostructures.

Authors:  Seung Gyo Jeong; Ambrose Seo; Woo Seok Choi
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 16.806

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.