| Literature DB >> 35035823 |
Haitao Sun1, Jing Li1, Yue Wang1, Xiaoke Ma2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of mobile Internet on attitude and self-efficacy of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) diagnosed by 12-lead Holter ECG.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35035823 PMCID: PMC8759848 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3414178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
General data.
| Observation indexes | Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 64.84 ± 6.71 | 65.19 ± 7.02 | 0.284 | 0.777 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.65 ± 3.41 | 22.73 ± 3.50 | 0.129 | 0.898 |
| Course of disease (years) | 3.51 ± 1.08 | 3.47 ± 1.10 | 0.204 | 0.838 |
| Gender | 0.130 | 0.719 | ||
| Male | 32 (51.61) | 34 (54.84) | ||
| Female | 30 (48.39) | 28 (45.16) | ||
| Basic diseases | ||||
| Hypertension | 27 (43.55) | 29 (46.77) | 0.130 | 0.718 |
| Diabetes | 35 (56.45) | 33 (53.23) | 0.130 | 0.718 |
| Hyperlipemia | 32 (51.61) | 30 (48.39) | 0.129 | 0.719 |
| High cholesterol | 29 (46.77) | 26 (41.94) | 0.294 | 0.588 |
| Education degree | 0.292 | 0.589 | ||
| Middle school degree and above | 35 (56.45) | 32 (51.61) | ||
| Middle school degree and below | 27 (43.55) | 30 (48.39) |
Figure 1PDR of patients (%). Note: the abscissa indicates groups, and the ordinate indicates the percentage. The PDR of the control group I was 29 (46.77%). The PDR of the control group II was 55 (88.71%). The PDR of the study group was 57 (91.94%). indicates the obvious difference in PDR between the control group I and the control group II (X2 = 24.948, P < 0.001). indicates the obvious difference in PDR between the control group I and the study group (X2 = 29.748, P < 0.001).
Figure 2Scores of CAS-R of patients. Note: the abscissa indicated CAS-R, and the ordinate indicated the score. The score of CAS-R of the control group after intervention was (28.74 ± 4.35). The score of CAS-R of the study group after intervention was (31.09 ± 5.12). indicates the obvious difference in the scores of CAS-R between groups after intervention (t = 2.754, P=0.007).
Patients' self-efficacy.
| Evaluation dimension | Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular returning visit | 24 (38.71) | 51 (82.26) | 24.598 | <0.001 |
| Emotional control | 22 (35.48) | 55 (88.71) | 37.313 | <0.001 |
| Monitoring of blood pressure and blood fat | 34 (54.84) | 57 (91.94) | 21.844 | <0.001 |
| Exercise | 27 (43.55) | 48 (77.42) | 14.880 | <0.001 |
| Diet control | 36 (58.06) | 58 (93.55) | 21.282 | <0.001 |
| Reasonable diet structure | 25 (40.32) | 49 (79.03) | 19.304 | <0.001 |
| Timely medication | 36 (58.06) | 60 (96.77) | 26.571 | <0.001 |
| Medication conforming to dosage | 32 (51.61) | 59 (95.16) | 30.102 | <0.001 |
| Persistent medication | 27 (43.55) | 55 (88.71) | 28.228 | <0.001 |
| Quitting smoking | 30 (48.39) | 51 (82.26) | 15.700 | <0.001 |
| Quitting drinking | 28 (45.16) | 46 (74.19) | 10.858 | <0.001 |
Figure 3ROC curve of patients.
Area under curve.
| Test result variables | Area | Standarderrora | AsymptoticSig.b | Asymptotic 95% confidence interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-lead Holter ECG combined with mobile Internet + routine ECG | 0.976 | 0.024 | 0.105 | 0.000–1.000 |
| 12-lead Holter ECG combined with mobile Internet | 0.960 | 0.034 | 0.117 | 0.000–1.000 |
| 12-lead Holter ECG | 0.944 | 0.044 | 0.130 | 0.000–1.000 |
| Routine ECG | 0.734 | 0.162 | 0.425 | 0.000–1.000 |
aindicates nonparametric assumptions; bindicates zero hypothesis, real area = 0.5.