Haixia Wang1, Pingping Liu1, Hai Xu1, Hongmei Dai2. 1. Department of Gynaecology, Dongying People's Hospital Dongying, Shandong, China. 2. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Dongying People's Hospital Dongying, Shandong, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum human epididymal protein 4 (HE4), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in early identification in ovarian cancer. METHOD: A total of 50 patients with ovarian cancer and 50 patients with benign ovarian tumors admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were included in Group A and Group B, respectively, and 50 healthy adult females during the same period were assigned to the blank group. The serum levels of HE4 and CA125 in each group were determined, and the ROMA of them was calculated according to postmenopausal status. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive diagnosis rate of HE4, CA125, and ROMA were calculated, and ROC curves were drawn to compare the diagnostic value of the three. RESULTS: Group A showed significantly higher serum levels of HE4 and CA125 and a significantly higher ROMA than Group B and the blank group (both P<0.05). No significant difference was found in the serum level of HE4 between Group B and the blank group (P>0.05). The serum level of CA125 and ROMA were significantly higher in Group B when compared with those of the blank group (both P<0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity and positive diagnosis rate of the three indexes, from high to low, were HE4+CA125+ROMA>ROMA>HE4>CA125 (all P<0.05). The diagnostic specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) of the three indexes, from high to low, were HE4+CA125+ROMA>HE4>ROMA>CA125 (all P<0.05). Histologic grading and lymph node metastasis were factors affecting the serum levels of HE4, CA125, and ROMA in patients with ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: The combined detection of HE4, CA125, and ROMA is more effective than diagnosis with any single indicator, so the combined diagnosis has a high application value in the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. AJTR
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum human epididymal protein 4 (HE4), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in early identification in ovarian cancer. METHOD: A total of 50 patients with ovarian cancer and 50 patients with benign ovarian tumors admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were included in Group A and Group B, respectively, and 50 healthy adult females during the same period were assigned to the blank group. The serum levels of HE4 and CA125 in each group were determined, and the ROMA of them was calculated according to postmenopausal status. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive diagnosis rate of HE4, CA125, and ROMA were calculated, and ROC curves were drawn to compare the diagnostic value of the three. RESULTS: Group A showed significantly higher serum levels of HE4 and CA125 and a significantly higher ROMA than Group B and the blank group (both P<0.05). No significant difference was found in the serum level of HE4 between Group B and the blank group (P>0.05). The serum level of CA125 and ROMA were significantly higher in Group B when compared with those of the blank group (both P<0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity and positive diagnosis rate of the three indexes, from high to low, were HE4+CA125+ROMA>ROMA>HE4>CA125 (all P<0.05). The diagnostic specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) of the three indexes, from high to low, were HE4+CA125+ROMA>HE4>ROMA>CA125 (all P<0.05). Histologic grading and lymph node metastasis were factors affecting the serum levels of HE4, CA125, and ROMA in patients with ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: The combined detection of HE4, CA125, and ROMA is more effective than diagnosis with any single indicator, so the combined diagnosis has a high application value in the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. AJTR
Authors: Clare J Reade; Ruaidhrí M McVey; Alicia A Tone; Sarah J Finlayson; Jessica N McAlpine; Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Sarah E Ferguson Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Can Date: 2014-02