Kexin Li1, Yuqing Pei1, Yue Wu1, Yi Guo1, Wei Cui2. 1. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. wendycuiwei@sina.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) for ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A thorough research was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase (until November 2018) to identify studies evaluating the accuracy of MALDI-TOF-MS for ovarian cancer. Using Meta-Disc1.4, Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software to analyze the pooled results: sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) and area under the curve (AUC) show the overall performance of MALDI-TOF-MS. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Methodological quality analysis of the included studies showed that these articles were at low risk of bias and applicability concerns in total. Summary estimates of the diagnostic parameters were as follows: sensitivity, 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.80); specificity, 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.74), PLR, 2.80 (95% CI: 2.41-3.24); NLR, 0.30 (95% CI: 0.22-0.40) and DOR, 10.71 (95% CI: 7.81-14.68). And the AUC was 0.8336. Egger's test showed no significant publication bias in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, MALDI-TOF-MS shows a good ability for diagnosing ovarian cancer. Further evaluation and optimization of standardized procedures are necessary for complete relying on MALDI-TOF-MS to diagnose ovarian cancer.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) for ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A thorough research was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase (until November 2018) to identify studies evaluating the accuracy of MALDI-TOF-MS for ovarian cancer. Using Meta-Disc1.4, Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software to analyze the pooled results: sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) and area under the curve (AUC) show the overall performance of MALDI-TOF-MS. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Methodological quality analysis of the included studies showed that these articles were at low risk of bias and applicability concerns in total. Summary estimates of the diagnostic parameters were as follows: sensitivity, 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73-0.80); specificity, 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.74), PLR, 2.80 (95% CI: 2.41-3.24); NLR, 0.30 (95% CI: 0.22-0.40) and DOR, 10.71 (95% CI: 7.81-14.68). And the AUC was 0.8336. Egger's test showed no significant publication bias in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, MALDI-TOF-MS shows a good ability for diagnosing ovarian cancer. Further evaluation and optimization of standardized procedures are necessary for complete relying on MALDI-TOF-MS to diagnose ovarian cancer.