Literature DB >> 35035718

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ciprofol emulsion in Chinese subjects: a single center, open-label, single-arm dose-escalation phase 1 study.

Yi Teng1,2, Meng-Chan Ou1,2, Xiao Wang1,2, Wen-Sheng Zhang1,2, Xiao Liu3, Yong Liang3, Yun-Xia Zuo1,2, Tao Zhu1,2, Bin Liu1,2, Jin Liu1,2.   

Abstract

We conducted a single-center, single-arm, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the tolerability of a single intravenous injection of ciprofol emulsion for the induction of short-term general anesthesia. Four doses of ciprofol (0.15 mg/kg, n = 2; 0.4 mg/kg, n = 10; 0.6 mg/kg, n = 6; 0.9 mg/kg, n = 6) were administered. Twenty-four subjects were enrolled, with 18 subjects in the 0.4 to 0.9 mg/kg dosage groups included in the data analysis. In total, 37 mild and 4 moderate adverse events (AEs), including 9 abnormal limb movements (3 moderate cases), 8 cases of sinus bradycardia, 11 cases of prolonged QTcF interval (including 1 moderate case), and 1 case of hypotension, were found, but no serious AEs were reported. The Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores rapidly decreased after ciprofol administration. The duration of recovery of the verbal response, loss of verbal response duration, the duration of MOAA/S ≤1 and the duration until the return of responsiveness were all increased in a dose-dependent manner. The durations of bispectral index values <60 (6, 8 and 12 min) were similar to the durations of loss of verbal response (6, 8 and 14 min) and MOAA/S ≤1 (5, 5.5 and 13.5 min) in the 0.4, 0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. The plasma concentration reached a peak value approximately 2 min after injection in the 0.4-0.9 mg/kg groups and all subjects fully recovered after ciprofol administration, with the shortest time being 9.2 min in the 0.4 mg/kg group. A ciprofol dosing regimen of 0.4-0.9 mg/kg was well-tolerated and exhibited rapid onset and recovery properties. AJTR
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthetic; ciprofol; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; sedation

Year:  2021        PMID: 35035718      PMCID: PMC8748126     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  24 in total

1.  Prevention of pain on injection with propofol: a quantitative systematic review.

Authors:  P Picard; M R Tramèr
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam.

Authors:  D A Chernik; D Gillings; H Laine; J Hendler; J M Silver; A B Davidson; E M Schwam; J L Siegel
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.153

3.  Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.

Authors:  P S Myles; J O Hunt; C E Nightingale; H Fletcher; T Beh; D Tanil; A Nagy; A Rubinstein; J L Ponsford
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Experimental conditions are important determinants of cardiac inotropic effects of propofol.

Authors:  Noriaki Kanaya; Brad Gable; Peter J Wickley; Paul A Murray; Derek S Damron
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): Part I. Safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Laurie J Antonik; D Ronald Goldwater; Gavin J Kilpatrick; Gary S Tilbrook; Keith M Borkett
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  First Human Study of the Investigational Sedative and Anesthetic Drug AZD3043: A Dose-Escalation Trial to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of a 30-Minute Infusion in Healthy Male Volunteers.

Authors:  Sigridur Kalman; Pauline Koch; Kjell Ahlén; Stephen J Kanes; Stéphane Barassin; Marcus A Björnsson; Åke Norberg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Postoperative QT interval prolongation in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Peter Nagele; Swatilika Pal; Frank Brown; Jane Blood; J Philipp Miller; Joshua Johnston
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Ethnic differences in propofol and fentanyl response: a comparison among Caucasians, Kenyan Africans and Brazilians.

Authors:  O Ortolani; A Conti; Z W Ngumi; L Texeira; P Olang; I Amani; V C Medrado
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  A review of the safety and tolerance of propofol ('Diprivan').

Authors:  R D Stark; S M Binks; V N Dutka; K M O'Connor; M J Arnstein; J B Glen
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 10.  Pain on injection of propofol.

Authors:  C H Tan; M K Onsiong
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  What's New in Intravenous Anaesthesia? New Hypnotics, New Models and New Applications.

Authors:  Remco Vellinga; Beatrijs I Valk; Anthony R Absalom; Michel M R F Struys; Clemens R M Barends
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients with Mechanical Ventilation: A Clinical Trial Study Protocol.

Authors:  Yongjun Liu; Chuanxi Chen; Ning Liu; Li Tong; Yao Nie; Jianfeng Wu; Xiao Liu; Wei Gao; Lei Tang; Xiangdong Guan
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Efficacy and Safety of HSK3486 for Anesthesia/Sedation in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Propofol-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Study.

Authors:  Zhen Luo; Hong Tu; Xiang Zhang; Xiao Wang; Wen Ouyang; Xinchuan Wei; Xiaohua Zou; Zhaoqiong Zhu; Yalan Li; Wangning Shangguan; Hui Wu; Yaping Wang; Qulian Guo
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia.

Authors:  Xingqu Chen; Ping Guo; Li Yang; Zhuoling Liu; Deshui Yu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.009

5.  Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial.

Authors:  Junxiang Li; Xiao Wang; Jin Liu; Xia Wang; Xiangkui Li; Yaping Wang; Wen Ouyang; Jun Li; Shanglong Yao; Zhaoqiong Zhu; Qulian Guo; Yonghao Yu; Jinhai Meng; Yunxia Zuo
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.688

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.