Literature DB >> 35035491

Monitoring of Insecticide Resistance in Anopheles culicifacies in Twelve Districts of Madhya Pradesh, Central India (2017-2019).

Ashok K Mishra1, Praveen K Bharti1, Gyan Chand1, Aparup Das1, Himanshu Jayswar2, Manju Rahi3, Kamaraju Raghavendra4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are malaria vector control measures used in India, but the development of insecticide resistance poses major impediments for effective vector control strategies. As per the guidelines of the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), the study was conducted in 12 districts of Madhya Pradesh to generate data on insecticide resistance in malaria vectors.
METHODS: The susceptibility tests were conducted on adult An. culicifacies as per the WHO standard technique with wild-caught mosquitoes. The blood-fed female mosquitoes were exposed in 3 to 4 replicates on each occasion to the impregnated papers with specified discriminating dosages of the insecticides (DDT: 4%, malathion: 5%, deltamethrin: 0.05%, and alphacypermethrin: 0.05%), for one hour, and mortality was recorded after 24-hour holding.
RESULTS: An. culicifacies was found resistant to DDT 4% in all the 12 districts and malathion in 11 districts. The resistance to alphacypermethrin was also observed in two districts, and possible resistance was found to alphacypermethrin in seven districts and to deltamethrin in eight districts, while the vector was found susceptible to both deltamethrin and alphacypermethrin in only 3 districts.
CONCLUSION: An. culicifacies is resistant to DDT and malathion and has emerging resistance to pyrethroids, alphacypermethrin, and deltamethrin. Therefore, regular monitoring of insecticide susceptibility in malaria vectors is needed for implementing effective vector management strategies. However, studies to verify the impact of IRS with good coverage on the transmission of disease are required before deciding on the change of insecticide in conjunction with epidemiological data.
Copyright © 2022 Ashok K. Mishra et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35035491      PMCID: PMC8754615          DOI: 10.1155/2022/4404027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trop Med        ISSN: 1687-9686


1. Introduction

Malaria is a major public health problem in India, contributing to about 89% of incidence from South East Asia [1]. Five Indian states are responsible for transmission of more than 70% of malaria in the country of which Madhya Pradesh is the fifth highly malarious state which contributes about 5% of total malaria cases [2]. Anopheles culicifacies is the main malaria vector in rural and periurban areas in India contributing to about 65% of annual malaria transmission [3]. Insecticide-based vector control interventions currently in use in India include indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) [4]. One of the major impediments for effective vector control is the development of resistance in vectors to the insecticides which are used in public health sprays. Presently, three insecticides, DDT (organochlorine), malathion (organophosphate), and mostly synthetic pyrethroids, are used in IRS and LLINs. An. culicifacies has shown resistance to DDT [5-7] and malathion [8, 9] and also reduced susceptibility to synthetic pyrethroids in a few areas including in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh [10-14]. This study was undertaken as a task force project under the aegis of the Indian Council of Medical Research. Based on epidemiological data and geographic ecosystems, the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP) selected 12 districts of Madhya Pradesh to generate data on insecticide resistance in malaria vectors (Table 1).
Table 1

Epidemiological situation in the districts selected for the insecticide monitoring study.

DistrictsYearPopulationBSE+VEPFABERAPISPRPF%
Dhar201523647593489604328194915.002.001.0045.00
20162412054320115210076513.001.001.0036.00
Hoshangabad20151343272197175167266514.681.240.8539.0
20161372137197608113944514.420.830.5839.0
Anuppur2015811306797692007128010.003.003.0064.00
201677624879504122676410.002.002.0062.00
Panna20151078217167850133224216.001.001.0018.00
2016109978113969158247913.001.001.0030.00
Tikamgarh2015153463215223313361890.870.881.35
2016156402818530013273811.80.850.722.86
Shivpuri20161884582220925388557612.002.002.0015.00
2017192269020178116489311.001.001.006.00
Datia201686823290424456844.002.002.007.00
2017885586113899506310.000.500.502.00
Alirajpur20168009421224821602713152144
201781061484331704302101143
Bhind2016188087021817434245111.601.821.571.49
201719184881912131925119.971.001.010.57

Note. The epidemiological data of three districts (Singrauli, Khargone, and Umaria) were not available at the time of study. BSE: blood smear examination, +VE: number of malaria positive cases, PF: Plasmodium falciparum, ABER: annual blood examination rate, API: annual parasite incidence, SPR: slide positivity rate, and PF%: Plasmodium falciparum percentage.

There are 50 districts in Madhya Pradesh with a population of about 60 million, including 12 million tribal populations. The state consists of sparsely settled forested hills with a 31% forested area and serves as a reservoir for intense perennial malaria transmission [15]. In the present investigation, we monitored the insecticide susceptibility status of An. culicifacies in 12 districts of Madhya Pradesh against commonly used insecticides in the public health system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The susceptibility tests against An. culicifacies were carried out in 12 districts of Madhya Pradesh located in the northern, eastern, western and southern parts of the state, namely, districts Umaria, Singrauli, Anuppur, Panna, Tikamgarh, Hoshangabad, Khargone, Dhar, Alirajpur, Bhind, Datia, and Shivpuri, from July 2017 to July 2019. In the districts, three to seven villages in two to three CHCs (about 1% of total villages in the district) in different terrains, i.e., hilltop, plain, foothill, and forest terrains were selected for the studies (Table 2). Anuppur, Umaria, and Bhind were under DDT indoor spray and Singrauli, Panna, Hoshangabad, Khargone, Dhar, Alirajpur, and Shivpuri were under alphacypermethrin (synthetic pyrethroid) indoor spray. In districts Tikamgarh and Datia, there was no routine indoor spray for the last >20 years due to low malaria prevalence (<2 API). However, in the year 2016, 26 villages in the district of Tikamgarh received focal sprays of DDT. In five districts, viz., Panna, Anuppur, Singrauli, Alirajpur, and Dhar, long-lasting insecticide-treated nets were distributed (Table 2). However, all the districts were proposed for LLIN distribution by the year 2019.
Table 2

Profile of study areas including the vector control measures and the period of study.

S No.DistrictsLocationInsecticide used for IRSLLIN distributed (yes or no)No. of study villagesEcotype of villagesPeriod of surveys
1AnuppurEastDDTYes6Plain, foothill, hilltopSept 2017
2PannaNorth eastSPYes6Plain, foothill, hilltopOct 2017
3TikamgarhNorthNo sprayNo3Plain, forestOct 2017
4SingrauliEastSPYes6Plain, foothill, hilltopOct 2017
5UmariaEastDDTNo6Plain, foothill, hilltopJuly 2017
6HoshangabadSouthSPYes6Plain, foothill, hilltopApr 2018
7KhargoneSouthSPNo6Plain, foothill, forestSept 2018
8AlirajpurWestSPYes6Plain, foothill, forestDec 2018 and Jul 2019
9DharWestSPYes6Plain, foothill, forestDec 2018 and Jul 2019
10ShivpuriNorthSPNo7Plain, foothill, hilltopFeb 2019
11DatiaNorthNo sprayNo6Plain, forestFeb 2019
12BhindNorthDDTNo7Plain, foothillJul 2019

SP = synthetic pyrethroids: alphacypermethrin

2.2. Insecticide Susceptibility Tests

Susceptibility tests were conducted on adult An. culicifacies following essentially the WHO standard procedures using the kit and method [16]. Wild-caught mosquitoes were collected from different resting sites (indoors-human dwellings/cattle sheds and outdoors) and preferably blood-fed female mosquitoes [17] and identified based on morphological characters [18] in the selected villages of the districts in the different months from 2017 to 2019 (Table 2). The collected mosquitoes were brought to the laboratory for testing in cloth cages wrapped with wet towels. Female mosquitoes were exposed in 3 to 4 replicates on each occasion to the WHO impregnated papers with specified discriminating dosages of the insecticides (DDT: 4%, malathion: 5%, deltamethrin: 0.05%, and alphacypermethrin: 0.05%), with respective insecticide controls for comparison (two replicates) for one hour, and mortality was recorded after 24-hour holding. The tests were repeated within 2 or 3 days in different villages of different terrains in each district. Cartons with wet towels at the bottom were used to conduct the tests to maintain the ambient temperature of 26 ± 2°C and the RH of 70–80% [19]. Mortality after 24 hrs of holding period was recorded [20]. Percent mortality was calculated separately for the test and control replicates using the following formula: % observed mortality = number of dead mosquitoes × 100/number of mosquitoes tested. If the mortality in control replicates is between 5% and 20%, the test mortality was corrected with the control mortality using Abbott's formula [21]. In cases where the mortality in the controls exceeded 20%, the test was discarded: % corrected mortality = (% test mortality – % control mortality) × 100/(100 – % control mortality). According to the WHO criteria [20], mosquito species that show on exposure to the diagnostic dosage of a given insecticide a mortality rate of 98 to 100% are designated as “susceptible,” <90% as “confirmed resistance,” and between 90% and 98% as “possible resistance.”

3. Results

Results of the susceptibility tests carried out in 12 districts are given in Table 3. An. culicifacies was found resistant to DDT in all the districts with a % mortality rate ranging from 7.6 to 60% and resistant to malathion in 11 districts (62 to 87%) (Figure 1).
Table 3

Susceptibility status of An. culicifacies to discriminatory dosages of DDT, malathion, alphacypermethrin, and deltamethrin in 12 districts of Madhya Pradesh.

Insecticide-%DistrictsNo. of mosquitoes exposedDead 24 hrMortality (%)Susceptibility status∗∗
ExpControlExpControl
DDT-4%Anuppur1056017116.2CR
Panna1054513112.4CR
Singrauli1054519018.1CR
Tikamgarh1053017016.2CR
Umaria1054515014.3CR
Hoshangabad10560827.6CR
Khargone1206015112.5CR
Alirajpur10545817.6CR
Dhar1204521017.5CR
Datia1004560160CR
Shivpuri1005541041CR
Bhind1054517016.2CR

Malathion-5%Anuppur1056068164.8CR
Panna1054577073.3CR
Singrauli1054574270.5CR
Tikamgarh1053089084.8CR
Umaria1054580076.2CR
Hoshangabad1056076272.4CR
Khargone1206078065CR
Alirajpur1054561058.1CR
Dhar1204578065CR
Datia1004593293PR
Shivpuri1005587287CR
Bhind1054567063.8CR

Alphacypermethrin-0.05%Anuppur10560103298.1S
Panna10545104099S
Singrauli1054595190.5PR
Tikamgarh105301050100S
Umaria10545100195.2PR
Hoshangabad10560101096.2PR
Khargone12060112193.3PR
Alirajpur1054592287.6CR
Dhar12045101184.2CR
Datia1004597297PR
Shivpuri1005593293PR
Bhind10545100095.2PR

Deltamethrin-0.05%Anuppur10560103298.1S
Panna10545104099S
Singrauli1054598193.3PR
Tikamgarh105301050100S
Umaria10545101196.2PR
Hoshangabad10560100095.2PR
Khargone12060116196.7PR
Alirajpur10545101296.2PR
Dhar12045112193.3PR
Datiya100451002100S
Shivpuri1005597297PR
Bhind10545102097.1PR

The control mortality in all districts in all insecticides was either <5.0. CR = confirmed resistant, PR = possible resistant, and S = susceptible.

Figure 1

Map of Madhya Pradesh showing study districts and insecticide susceptibility status of An. culicifacies.

In district Datia, species showed possible resistance to malathion, registering 93% mortality. Resistance to alphacypermethrin was observed in Dhar and Alirajpur districts where % mortality was 84.2 and 87.6, respectively, and tests were repeated after 6 months, and the mortality was 82.9 and 85.7% indicating no variation in mortality (Table 3). An. culicifacies was reported susceptible to pyrethroids, viz., alphacypermethrin and deltamethrin in 3 districts, i.e., Anuppur, Panna, and Tikamgarh (98.1 to 100.0% mortality), while in Datia it was susceptible to deltamethrin (100% mortality). An. culicifacies was possibly resistant to alphacypermethrin in 7 districts, viz., Singrauli, Umaria, Hoshangabad, Khargone, Datia, Shivpuri, and Bhind, with mortality ranging from 90.5 to 97.0%. However, to deltamethrin, possible resistance in An. culicifacies was observed in 8 districts, viz., Singrauli, Umaria, Hoshangabad, Khargone, Alirajpur, Dhar, Shivpuri, and Bhind where mortality registered was between 93.3 and 97% (Table 3). The terrain-wise pooled data of 12 districts (Table 4) showed similar susceptibility status in all 4 terrains, i.e., plain, foothill, hilltop, and forest areas except for deltamethrin. The species was possibly resistant with registered mortality of 96.7%, 94.3%, and 96.4%, respectively, in plain, foothill, and hilltop terrains, whereas in forest terrain the species was susceptible to deltamethrin with 98% mortality. However, the difference in observed mortalities was within a range of 2–4% indicating the population to be near susceptible or possibly resistant.
Table 4

Terrain-wise grouped insecticide susceptibility data in An. culicifacies.

Type of terrainInsecticideNo. of mosquitoes exposedMortality in 24 hrMortality (%)Susceptibility status
ExpControlExpControl
PlainDDT600285116319.3CR
Malathion600285442473.7CR
Alphacypermethrin6002855481091.3PR
Deltamethrin6002855801096.7PR
ForestDDT29512069023.4CR
Malathion295120213172.2CR
Alphacypermethrin295120274092.9PR
Deltamethrin295120289098.0S
FoothillDDT40019058214.5CR
Malathion400190268167.0PR
Alphacypermethrin400190366491.5PR
Deltamethrin400190377494.3PR
HilltopDDT1957540220.5CR
Malathion19575145474.4CR
Alphacypermethrin19575186095.4PR
Deltamethrin19575188096.4PR

CR = confirmed resistance, PR = possible resistance, and S = susceptible.

An. culicifacies showed resistance to DDT and malathion in all the terrains with the observed % mortality rate to DDT in the range of 14.5 to 23.4 and to malathion in the range of 67.0 to 74.4%. Possible resistance to alphacypermethrin was observed in all 4 terrains with a mortality rate in the range of 91.3 to 95.4%. Based on the spray history in last 10 years in different districts, districts were categorized into three groups: group A-IRS with pyrethroids, 7 districts, viz., Panna, Hoshangabad, Singrauli, Khargone, Dhar, Alirajpur, and Shivpuri; group B-IRS with DDT, 3 districts, viz., Anuppur, Umaria, and Bhind; and group C-without IRS, 2 districts, viz., Tikamgarh and Datia (Table 5). An. culicifacies was found resistant to DDT and malathion registering low % mortality rates for DDT of 16.2, 15.6, and 37.6% in groups A, B, and C, respectively, while increased % mortality rates were registered for malathion at 69.2, 68.3, and 88.8%, respectively. To pyrethroid alphacypermethrin, the species showed possible resistance in groups A and B with % mortality in the range of 90.2 and 96.2, respectively, but was susceptible in group C with 98.5% mortality. Statistical analysis of mortalities against alphacypermethrin between the sprayed group (A) and the no spray group (C) was highly significant (chi sq. = 15.36, p < 0.0001) and with the DDT sprayed group (B) (chi. Sq. = 11.15, p, 0.001) and no significance was seen in alphacypermethrin mortality when compared with the no spray (C) and the DDT sprayed (B) group (chi. Sq. = 2.44, p=0.118). The species showed possible resistance to deltamethrin with % mortality in the range of 95.2 and 97.1% in groups A and B, respectively, but was completely susceptible in group C.
Table 5

Susceptibility status of An. culicifacies in the districts grouped under different categories based on IRS.

Villages with different insecticide spraysInsecticideNo. of mosquitoes exposedNo. of mosquitoes dead% mortalitySusceptibility status
TestControlTestControl
Group A—pyrethroid IRS since last 5–10 years and earlier with DDT IRS-7 districts (Singrauli, Panna, Hoshangabad, Khargone, Dhar, Shivpuri, and Alirajpur)DDT970445157516.2CR
Malathion970445671769.2CR
Alphacypermethrin970445875990.2PR
Deltamethrin970445923995.2PR

Group B—DDT spray since last 5–10 years—3 districts (Anuppur, Bhind, and Umaria)DDT31510549115.6CR
Malathion315105215168.3CR
Alphacypermethrin315105303396.2PR
Deltamethrin315105306397.1PR

Group C—no spray since last >20 years—2 districts (Tikamgarh and Datia)DDT2057577137.6CR
Malathion20575182288.8CR
Alphacypermethrin20575202298.5S
Deltamethrin205752052100.0S

CR = confirmed resistant, PR = possible resistant, and S = susceptible.

4. Discussion

Insecticide resistance is becoming a limiting factor for effective malaria vector control for national programmes worldwide, especially in view of the committed elimination of malaria in this decade by 2030. Presently, about 125 species of mosquitoes are documented to show resistance to one or more insecticides. Raghavendra et al. [22] reviewed the status of insecticide resistance among the major malaria vectors in India in the last quarter century (1991–2016) based on the available information from published and unpublished reports. Resistance to DDT in An. culicifacies is widespread in the country [5, 6], and resistance to malathion is widespread in the districts in the states of Maharashtra [8], Gujrat [23, 24], Andhra Pradesh [24], Uttar Pradesh [9], and Madhya Pradesh [13]. There are a few reports of resistance to synthetic pyrethroids in various parts of the country [10-14]. Resistance to malathion was detected in five districts of Andhra Pradesh, nine districts of Odisha, and possible resistance in two districts of Jharkhand, 4 districts of Odisha, and 4 districts of West Bengal. An. culicifacies was found susceptible to malathion in two districts of Jharkhand and six districts of Odisha, resistant to deltamethrin in four districts of Andhra Pradesh, with possible resistance in 10 districts of Odisha, and susceptible to deltamethrin in some districts of Odisha, Jharkhand, and West Bengal [25]. In the present study, in Madhya Pradesh, An. culicifacies the main malaria vector was found resistant to DDT 4% in all the 12 districts surveyed and resistant to malathion in 11 districts, except in Datia district where the species is reported possibly resistant. The species was reported resistant to alphacypermethrin in two districts Dhar and Alirajpur. This vector was found susceptible to both deltamethrin and alphacypermethrin in three districts, i.e., Anuppur, Panna, and Tikamgarh. Possible resistance was found to alphacypermethrin in seven districts, namely, Singrauli, Umaria, Hoshangabad, Datia, Shivpuri, Bhind, and Khargone, and to deltamethrin in eight districts, viz., Singrauli, Umaria, Hoshangabad, Khargone, Alirajpur, Dhar, Shivpuri, and Bhind. Thus, the species was resistant to DDT and malathion in all the districts while it was mostly possible resistant to pyrethroids. It may be stated that DDT has been sprayed in these areas in surveyed districts since the inception of the national malaria control activities in the early 1950s. Decreased mortality in An. culicifacies to pyrethroids was found in areas that received alphacypermethrin IRS in the last 5–10 years. In all the areas, the species in different districts have shown resistance to DDT and malathion. However, in areas without pyrethroid indoor spray, the species registered possible resistance and were susceptible to pyrethroids, alphacypermethrin, and deltamethrin in the range of 96.2 to 100%. Malathion was not sprayed regularly in these areas and the observed resistance to malathion could be due to possible selection by its use in agriculture/forestry in the absence of its use in public health sprays but needs further investigation. To date, DDT, malathion, deltamethrin, alphacypermethrin, and lambda cyhalothrin are the most commonly used insecticides for vector control in public health in India, and other pyrethroid insecticides, namely, cyfluthrin and bifenthrin, are also recommended for use in antimalaria sprays [26]. Deltamethrin and alphacypermethrin impregnated LLINs are in extensive use in India in different states of the country, and Madhya Pradesh is receiving the LLINs in 2019 in all endemic districts. The resistance in mosquitoes may develop due to changes in their enzyme systems resulting in more rapid detoxification or sequestration of the insecticide or due to mutations in the target site preventing the insecticide target site interaction [27]. Spraying of insecticides without proper understanding of the prevailing resistance mechanism may lead to increased vector resistance and failure of vector control intervention. In India, end-point replacement of insecticides is practiced after failure of control of a given class of insecticide resulting in multiple resistance in malaria vectors [28].

5. Conclusion

Results of the present study in 12 districts of Madhya Pradesh indicate that An. culicifacies is reported resistant in all the districts to DDT and to malathion, while to pyrethroids, alphacypermethrin, and deltamethrin the species is reported mostly possible resistant. Owing to the dynamics of development of resistance as evidenced from the above study, there is a need for regular monitoring of insecticide susceptibility in malaria vectors for implementing effective disease vector management strategies. However, studies to verify the impact of IRS with good coverage on transmission of disease are needed before deciding on a change of insecticide in conjunction with epidemiological data [26]. In addition, insecticide molecules with novel modes of action belonging to new classes of insecticides and insecticide mixtures such as neonicotinoid and pyrrole including carbamate class of insecticides for IRS and LLIN interventions are in development/trials. These molecules need to be adapted for vector control in our country to keep the date for elimination. Furthermore, it needs to be emphasized that the regulatory norms being followed for the introduction of interventions need to be reviewed for faster introduction. This will facilitate to preserve the gains achieved so far and pave the way for a faster impact on the transmission of malaria and disease control, ultimately leading to malaria elimination by date.
  15 in total

1.  Susceptibility status of An. fluviatilis and An. culicifacies to DDT, deltamethrin and lambdacyhalothrin in District Nainital, Uttar Pradesh.

Authors:  S N Sharma; R P Shukla; K Raghavendra
Journal:  Indian J Malariol       Date:  1999 Sep-Dec

Review 2.  The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes.

Authors:  Janet Hemingway; Nicola J Hawkes; Lynn McCarroll; Hilary Ranson
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.714

3.  Magnitude of DDT resistance in Anopheles culicifacies in Maharashtra State.

Authors:  R B Deobhankar; N D Palkar
Journal:  J Commun Dis       Date:  1990-03

4.  Insecticide resistance status in Anopheles culicifacies in Madhya Pradesh, central India.

Authors:  A K Mishra; S K Chand; T K Barik; V K Dua; K Raghavendra
Journal:  J Vector Borne Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.688

5.  Impact of DDT and HCH spraying on malaria transmission in villages with DDT and HCH resistant Anopheles culicifacies.

Authors:  V P Sharma; R K Chandrahas; M A Ansari; P K Srivastava; R K Razdan; C P Batra; K Raghuvendra; B N Nagpal; S C Bhalla; G K Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Malariol       Date:  1986-06

6.  A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. 1925.

Authors:  W S Abbott
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 0.917

7.  Persistence of DDT, malathion & deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles culicifacies after their sequential withdrawal from indoor residual spraying in Surat district, India.

Authors:  K Raghavendra; Vaishali Verma; H C Srivastava; K Gunasekaran; U Sreehari; A P Dash
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Temporo-spatial distribution of insecticide-resistance in Indian malaria vectors in the last quarter-century: Need for regular resistance monitoring and management.

Authors:  Kamaraju Raghavendra; Poonam Sharma Velamuri; Vaishali Verma; Natarajan Elamathi; Tapan Kumar Barik; Rajendra Mohan Bhatt; Aditya Prasad Dash
Journal:  J Vector Borne Dis       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.688

9.  Malaria outbreak in Bhojpur PHC of district Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Authors:  R P Shukla; S N Sharma; S K Bhat
Journal:  J Commun Dis       Date:  2002-06

10.  Dynamics of forest malaria transmission in Balaghat district, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Neeru Singh; Sunil K Chand; Praveen K Bharti; Mrigendra P Singh; Gyan Chand; Ashok K Mishra; Man M Shukla; Man M Mahulia; Ravendra K Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of indoor residual spraying on malaria control: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yiguo Zhou; Wan-Xue Zhang; Elijah Tembo; Ming-Zhu Xie; Shan-Shan Zhang; Xin-Rui Wang; Ting-Ting Wei; Xin Feng; Yi-Lin Zhang; Juan Du; Ya-Qiong Liu; Xuan Zhang; Fuqiang Cui; Qing-Bin Lu
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 10.485

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.