Literature DB >> 35035041

To evaluate the effect of small-group demonstration-based training module in improving clinical skills in undergraduate medical students.

Anuj Singhal1, Arun Kumar Yadav2, H Anup3, B Anjali4, Sonal Singh5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In today's modern era, the two most important aspects of medical education are evaluation- and outcome-based learning. Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPSs ) is a well-known method of evaluation which constitutes a direct observation of the practical skills being performed by the student and simultaneous written feedback by the teacher.
METHOD: A total of 40 undergraduate students were taught by a module based on DOPS. A pre-test and post-test was conducted on DOPS examination pattern and was compared by the Cochran's Q test.
RESULTS: In this study, a total of 40 medical undergraduate students and 10 teachers participated. Each student was given one pre-test and five post-test with ultrasound proven mild to moderate splenomegaly. Each student was individually assessed on a module based on DOPS and was given direct feedback by the teachers. A total of 34 (85%) students strongly agreed that they felt comfortable and confident with this methodology.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed that DOPS tests can be used as an effective evaluation method to assess medical students because of its appropriate validity and reliability, positive impact on learning, and high satisfaction level amongst students. However, special attention needs to be given to the quality of these tests.
© 2020 Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India Pvt. Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bedside mannerisms; Clinical skills; Communication skills; Directly observed procedural skills; Medical undergraduate

Year:  2020        PMID: 35035041      PMCID: PMC8737108          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  16 in total

1.  The construction of learning curves for basic skills in anesthetic procedures: an application for the cumulative sum method.

Authors:  Getúlio Rodrigues de Oliveira Filho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists.

Authors:  John Roger Barton; Sally Corbett; Cees Petronella van der Vleuten
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: Guide supplement 31.3--viewpoint.

Authors:  Habiba Saedon; M H M Saedon; S P Aggarwal
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  James R Wilkinson; James G M Crossley; Andrew Wragg; Peter Mills; George Cowan; Winnie Wade
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 5.  Assessment of procedural skills in anaesthesia.

Authors:  M D Bould; N A Crabtree; V N Naik
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 6.  Validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS).

Authors:  Naghma Naeem
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.711

7.  DOPS assessment: a study to evaluate the experience and opinions of trainees and assessors.

Authors:  Natish Bindal; Helen Goodyear; Taruna Bindal; David Wall
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 8.  Splenic function: normal, too much and too little.

Authors:  E R Eichner
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Splenomegaly. An algorithmic approach to diagnosis.

Authors:  E R Eichner; C L Whitfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Palpable spleens in college freshmen.

Authors:  O R McIntyre; F G Ebaugh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.