Literature DB >> 35034330

Governance of forest resource use in western Nepal: Current state and community preferences.

Manoj Bhatta1, Kerstin K Zander2, Stephen T Garnett3.   

Abstract

Improved governance of natural resource use is critical to the sustainability and maintenance of environmental quality. In western Nepal, unsustainable resource extraction is seen by the local community as a major threat to forest sustainability. While most respondents to a survey of 243 households inside and outside a protected area (PA) thought the laws for managing resource use were adequate and appropriate, a far smaller proportion thought they were achieving their objectives. Disenchantment with the existing governance regime was strongest outside the PA, probably because there was greater investment in community engagement within the PA. The most likely reason for this failure is the deeply embedded corruption within the forest governance system. Devolution of power to local communities by increasing governance participation is one of the most likely means of containing corruption. It was therefore not surprising that governance participation was rated as the most important governance principle by respondents in a best-worst scaling experiment. Respondents also regarded effectiveness, accountability and transparency as important governance principle to improve management of forest resource extraction from red panda habitat.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best–worst scaling; Community participation; Corruption; Protected areas; Red panda

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35034330      PMCID: PMC9110619          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01694-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  5 in total

1.  Scoring best-worst data in unbalanced many-item designs, with applications to crowdsourcing semantic judgments.

Authors:  Geoff Hollis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-04

2.  Applying best-worst scaling to rank ecosystem and economic benefits of restoration and conservation in the Great Lakes.

Authors:  Emily H Tyner; Tracy A Boyer
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it.

Authors:  Terry N Flynn; Jordan J Louviere; Tim J Peters; Joanna Coast
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments.

Authors:  Paul J Ferraro; Subhrendu K Pattanayak
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Climate change causes critical transitions and irreversible alterations of mountain forests.

Authors:  Katharina Albrich; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 13.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.