Literature DB >> 35034164

Path-related pain after implantation of anterior transvaginal mesh: perspective from anatomical study.

Lin Zhang1, Zichen Zhao1, Juan Chen2, Yidi Ma1, Guorui Zhang2, Lan Zhu3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common gynecological disease caused by defects in pelvic support tissue that manifests as the descent of the pelvic organs, significantly impacting patient quality of life. Transvaginal mesh (TVM) is an effective treatment (Grade A). However, postoperative pain in the groin and medial thigh is very common. Although the use of mesh for transvaginal POP repair has been prohibited or the indications for such use have been extensively limited in many places, it is still an alternative in some countries. Therefore, the safety of the use of mesh still needs to be discussed. The current research on postoperative pain has mainly focused on management. The pathophysiology is unclear.
METHODS: In this study, anterior TVM surgery was performed on ten frozen cadavers. The obturator area was carefully dissected. We explored the relative position of the polypropylene mesh to the internal segment of the obturator nerve in the obturator canal.
RESULTS: Four out of 20 obturator explorations were insufficient to allow conclusions to be drawn. We observed a small branch of the obturator nerve, which is a new anatomical finding that we named the obturator externus muscle branch. This structure terminated in the external obturator muscle in 6 out of the 16 successfully dissected obturator areas. The mean distance between the superficial mesh arm and this nerve branch was 7.5 mm. The mean distance between the deep mesh arm and the closest nerve branch was 5.5 mm.
CONCLUSION: The path of the obturator externus muscle branch of the obturator nerve ran close to the mesh arm. It may provide a clinical anatomical basis explaining the observed postoperative pain.
© 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Obturator nerve; POP; Postoperative pain; TVM

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35034164     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04924-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   1.932


  16 in total

1.  American Urogynecologic Society Prolapse Consensus Conference Summary Report.

Authors:  Nazema Y Siddiqui; W Thomas Gregory; Victoria L Handa; John O L DeLancey; Holly E Richter; Pamela Moalli; Matthew D Barber; Samantha Pulliam; Anthony G Visco; Marianna Alperin; Carlos Medina; Matthew O Fraser; Catherine S Bradley
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Diagnostic value of pelvic floor ultrasonography for diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yuanjing Gao; Zhiwei Zhao; Yanlin Yang; Meiqin Zhang; Jiang Wu; Yali Miao
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  FIGO review of statements on use of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Aiste Ugianskiene; G Willy Davila; Tsung-Hsien Su
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Mesh retraction correlates with vaginal pain and overactive bladder symptoms after anterior vaginal mesh repair.

Authors:  A Rogowski; P Bienkowski; A Tosiak; M Jerzak; P Mierzejewski; W Baranowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system?

Authors:  Chendrimada Madhu; Steven Swift; Sophie Moloney-Geany; Marcus J Drake
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 6.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Pain Scores and Exposure Rates after Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Jana D Illston; Jeffrey B Garris; Holly E Richter; Thomas L Wheeler
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Mesh-related and intraoperative complications of pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  George Kasyan; Karina Abramyan; Alexander A Popov; Mikhail Gvozdev; Dmitry Pushkar
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-08-18

Review 9.  Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process.

Authors:  Carl J Heneghan; Ben Goldacre; Igho Onakpoya; Jeffrey K Aronson; Tom Jefferson; Annette Pluddemann; Kamal R Mahtani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Long-term outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse repair using a mesh-capturing device when comparing single- versus multicenter use.

Authors:  Christian Falconer; Daniel Altman; Georgios Poutakidis; Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo; Tomi Mikkola; Edward Morcos
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.344

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect evaluation of traditional vaginal surgery and transvaginal mesh surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapse: 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Ying-An Zhang; Wei Wang; Xiao-Li Li; Jie Pan; Zhao-Ai Li
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-04-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.