| Literature DB >> 35032108 |
Mi Shao1,2,3,4, Xinyi Teng1,2,3,4, Xin Guo1,2,3,4, Hao Zhang5, Yue Huang1,2,3,4, Jiazhen Cui1,2,3,4, Xiaohui Si1,2,3,4, Lijuan Ding1,2,3,4, Xiujian Wang1,2,3,4, Xia Li1,2,3,4, Jimin Shi1,2,3,4, Mingming Zhang1,2,3,4, Delin Kong1,2,3,4, Tianning Gu1,2,3,4, Yongxian Hu1,2,3,4, Pengxu Qian2,3,4,6, He Huang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are potent agents for recognizing and eliminating tumors, and have achieved remarkable success in the treatment of patients with refractory leukemia and lymphoma. However, dysfunction of T cells, including exhaustion, is an inevitable obstacle for persistent curative effects. Here, the authors initially found that calcium signaling is hyperactivated via sustained tonic signaling in CAR-T cells. Next, it is revealed that the store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) inhibitor BTP-2, but not the calcium chelator BAPTA-AM, markedly diminishes CAR-T cell exhaustion and terminal differentiation of CAR-T cells in both tonic signaling and tumor antigen exposure models. Furthermore, BTP-2 pretreated CAR-T cells show improved antitumor potency and prolonged survival in vivo. Mechanistically, transcriptome and metabolite analyses reveal that treatment with BTP-2 significantly downregulate SOCE-calcineurin-nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) and glycolysis pathways. Together, the results indicate that modulating the SOCE-calcineurin-NFAT pathway in CAR-T cells renders them resistant to exhaustion, thereby yielding CAR products with enhanced antitumor potency.Entities:
Keywords: calcium signaling; chimeric antigen receptor T; exhaustion; glycolysis; store-operated calcium entry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35032108 PMCID: PMC8948559 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Calcium signal was enhanced via tonic signaling. A) Experimental design: T cells were isolated from PBMCs, enriched, and activated at day ‐1. 4‐1BB CAR lentivirus was transduced at day 0. CAR‐T cells were cultured in vitro and sorted at day 5. Unmodified T cells, CAR‐T cells at day 6, and CAR‐T cells at day 12 were collected for FACS and bulk RNA sequencing. Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of B,D) effector or memory markers (CD62L and CD45RO) and C,E) activation marker (CD69) and inhibitory markers (PD‐1, TIM‐3, LAG‐3) on T cells. F) GO‐term enrichment analysis showing the list of top signaling pathways in each group. G) The heatmap and clustering of fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM) of the calcium‐related genes in each group. Flow cytometric analysis of the concentration of intracellular calcium in H) T cells at different culture times and I) CAR‐T cells of different phenotypes. J) Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of differentiation (CD62L), activation (CD69), and inhibitory (PD‐1, TIM‐3, and LAG‐3) markers on T cells. Data are reported as the means ± SEMs. n = 3 or more independent biological replicates, presented as individual points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p ≤ 0.001 (one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett post‐hoc test; comparing n = 3 or more in vitro biological replicates per group).
Figure 2The SOCE inhibitor BTP‐2 reduced excessive activation of CAR‐T cells. A) Schematic diagram of the mechanism of different calcium inhibitors. B) Experimental design: CAR‐T cells were stimulated using anti‐CD3/CD28 beads and treated with DMSO/BAPTA/BTP‐2 on days 6–9 following activation or FACS. C–F) Flow cytometric analysis and fluorescence imaging of the intracellular calcium concentration of each group. Histograms and plots of the representative donor are shown. Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of G,H) activation (CD25 and CD69) and I,J) memory (CD62L and CD45RO) markers on CAR+ T cells. Data are reported as the means ± SEMs. n = 3 or more independent biological replicates, presented as individual points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p ≤ 0.001 (one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett post‐hoc test; comparing n = 3 or more in vitro biological replicates per group).
Figure 3BTP‐2 prevents CAR‐T cell exhaustion in vitro. A) Experimental design: CAR‐T cells were cultured in vitro and treated with DMSO/BAPTA/BTP‐2 at day 9–12 for three consecutive days. B) The number of CAR‐T cells was calculated using cell counts on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and CCK8 was calculated on day 3. C) Lysis of target cells measured at 4 h. Effector‐to‐target (E:T) ratios were 1:1 (red line) or 1:2 (blue line). Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of D,E) activation (CD25 and CD69), inhibitory receptor (PD‐1, TIM‐3, and LAG‐3) and F,G) differentiation status (CD62L and CD45RO) markers. H,I) Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of intracellular cytokines (granzyme B, IFN‐γ, IL‐2, and TNF‐α). Data are reported as the means ± SEMs. n = 3 or more independent biological replicates, presented as individual points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p ≤ 0.001 (one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett post‐hoc test; comparing n = 3 or more in vitro biological replicates per group).
Figure 4BTP‐2 enhances antitumor activity of CAR‐T cells in vivo. A) Treatment schedule and experimental set‐up. NSG mice received either 1 × l06 Nalm6 cells on day 0 and either untransduced T cells (MOCK) or 4‐1BB CD19‐CAR‐T cells on day 6. B) D5‐41 bioluminescence imaging of tumor growth (n = 5 mice/group). C) The dorsal BLI signal is displayed for individual mice in each treatment group. D) Kaplan–Meyer survival plot for mice receiving mock T cells or CAR‐T cells pretreated with different calcium inhibitors (n = 5) (statistical analysis by Mantel–Cox test, p < 0.0001). CAR‐T cells were isolated from peripheral blood on day 8 and analyzed by flow cytometry for E) count and percentage, F) differentiation status (CD62L), and G) expression of inhibitory receptors (TIM‐3 and LAG‐3). Data are reported as the means ± SEMs. n = 5 independent biological replicates, presented as individual points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p ≤ 0.001 (one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett post‐hoc test; comparing n = 5 independent replicates per group).
Figure 5BTP‐2 reverses CAR‐T cell differentiation and exhaustion induced by tumor antigen exposure A) Experimental design: CAR‐T cells were cocultured with Nalm6 cells at a ratio of 1:1 for 72 h. The remaining CAR‐T cells were collected and treated with DMSO/BAPTA/BTP‐2 for 3 days. B) The number of CAR‐T cells was calculated using cell counts on days 1, 2, and 3. Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of C,D) activation (CD25 and CD69), inhibitory receptor (PD‐1, TIM‐3, and LAG‐3) and E,F) differentiation status (CD62L and CD45RO) markers. G) Patterns of expression and co‐expression of the inhibitory molecules PD‐1, TIM‐3, and LAG‐3. The proportions of non‐positive (PD1‐TIM3‐LAG3‐), single‐positive (PD1+TIM3‐LAG3‐ or PD1‐TIM3+LAG3‐ or PD1‐TIM3‐LAG3+), double‐positive (PD1+TIM3+LAG3‐ or PD1+TIM3‐LAG3+ or PD1‐TIM3+LAG3+), and triple‐positive (PD1+TIM3+LAG3+) are depicted, which were detected by FACS. H) mRNA level of exhaustion‐related transcription factors in different groups. I,J) Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of intracellular cytokines (granzyme B, IFN‐γ, IL‐2, and TNF‐α). Data are reported as the means ± SEMs. n = 3 or more independent biological replicates, presented as individual points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001 (one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett post‐hoc test; comparing n = 3 or more in vitro biological replicates per group).
Figure 6BTP‐2 impedes CAR‐T cell exhaustion through the calcium‐calcineurin‐NFAT and glycolysis pathways. A) Principal component analysis of CAR‐T cells in different groups. B) Heatmap showing the FPKM values of a total of 2061 DEGs in comparisons with the control group. C) Volcano plot depicting the significant DEGs in the BTP‐2 group compared with the control. The red or blue dots respectively represent the genes with up‐ or down‐regulated expression with fold change >2 or <0.5, respectively, and −log10 p‐value >2. D) The red or blue bars illustrate the pathways in which the up‐ or down‐regulated genes in the BTP‐2 group, respectively, are over‐represented. E) GSEA plot of which from GO gene sets. Enrichment plot of the glycolytic process from the GO gene set obtained performing GSEA. F,G) For western blot analysis of NFATc1, Nalm6 stimulated CAR‐T cells were treated with DMSO/BAPTA/BTP‐2/FK‐506 for 3 days and the cytoplasmic proteins and nuclear proteins were separated. Quantitative analysis of western blot data obtained in n = 3 experiments is shown, normalized to β‐Actin. H) Flow cytometric analysis of the expression of differentiation status (CD62L and CD45RO), activation (CD25 and CD69), and inhibitory receptor (PD‐1, TIM‐3, and LAG‐3) markers in FK‐506 treated CAR‐T cells and CTRL CAR‐T cells. I) Metabolomic analysis for metabolites in the EMP in CAR‐T cells treated with DMSO/BTP‐2/FK‐506. J) mRNA level of glycolysis‐related enzymes in different groups. Data are presented as the means ± SEM (3 or more independent experiments). K) The extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) was measured in real time in an XFe96 analyzer after injection of glucose, oligomycin, and 2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose (2DG). Graphical analysis of glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, and glycolytic reserve (n = 5). Data reported as means ± SEMs. n = 3 or more independent biological replicates, presented as individual points. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001 (G, J, and K: one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett post‐hoc test, H: two‐tailed paired Student's t‐tests, comparing n = 3 or more in vitro biological replicates per group).