Literature DB >> 35031872

miRNAs derived from plasma small extracellular vesicles predict organo-tropic metastasis of gastric cancer.

Cheng Zhang1, Jing Yang1, Yang Chen1, Jing Gao2, Fangli Jiang1, Haiyan Liao2, Xiang Liu3, Yuan Wang3, Guanyi Kong3, Xiaotian Zhang1, Jian Li1, Lin Shen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peritoneum, liver and lymph node are the most common metastatic sites of gastric cancer (GC). Biomarkers for GC's organo-tropic metastasis remained largely unknown, which was investigated in this study from the perspective of small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-derived miRNAs.
METHODS: Plasma from treatment-naïve GC patients including no metastasis (M0), peritoneal metastasis (PM), hepatic metastasis (HM) and distant lymph node metastasis (dLNM)) were divided into one discovery (N = 40), one training (N = 40) and one validating cohort (N = 86), then assessed by sEV-miRNA-sequencing and sEV-miRNA-qPCR. Functional explorations were also performed for verification.
RESULTS: The expression profiles of sEV-miRNAs varied greatly across different metastatic patterns. Based on logistic regression models, we constructed signatures for M0 (hsa-miR-186-5p/hsa-miR-200c-3p/hsa-miR-429/hsa-miR-5187-5p/hsa-miR-548ae-5p), PM (hsa-miR-200c-3p/hsa-miR-429), HM (hsa-miR-200c-3p/hsa-miR-429) and dLNM (hsa-miR-324-5p/hsa-miR-374a-5p/hsa-miR-429/hsa-miR-548ae-5p). These signatures vigorously characterized organo-tropic metastasis (all displaying AUC > 0.8, consistency ≥ 75%), and effectively conjectured the risk of future metastasis within 5 years (accuracy 45.5% for occurrence, 70% for organotropism, P = 0.002 for prognostic diversity). Additionally, we explored these seven biomarker miRNAs' impact on GC's in vitro motility and discussed their potential involvement in cancer-related biological processes and pathways.
CONCLUSIONS: Our work highlighted that plasma sEV-miRNAs powerfully characterized and predicted the organo-tropic metastasis of GC and provided new insight into the applications of sEV-based liquid biopsy in clinical practice.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Liquid biopsy; Organo-tropic metastasis; sEV-derived miRNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35031872     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01267-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  35 in total

Review 1.  Cancer metastasis: building a framework.

Authors:  Gaorav P Gupta; Joan Massagué
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Metastasis Organotropism: Redefining the Congenial Soil.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Igor Bado; Hai Wang; Weijie Zhang; Jeffrey M Rosen; Xiang H-F Zhang
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Differences in gastric cancer survival between the U.S. and China.

Authors:  Vivian E Strong; Ai-Wen Wu; Luke V Selby; Mithat Gonen; Meier Hsu; Kyo Young Song; Cho Hyun Park; Daniel G Coit; Jia-Fu Ji; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  No improvement in median survival for patients with metastatic gastric cancer despite increased use of chemotherapy.

Authors:  N Bernards; G J Creemers; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; K Bosscha; J F M Pruijt; V E P P Lemmens
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin: a population-based study on incidence, survival and risk factors.

Authors:  Irene Thomassen; Yvette R van Gestel; Bert van Ramshorst; Misha D Luyer; Koop Bosscha; Simon W Nienhuijs; Valery E Lemmens; Ignace H de Hingh
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients: Can we improve survival by metastasectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rahul Gadde; Leonardo Tamariz; Mena Hanna; Eli Avisar; Alan Livingstone; Dido Franceschi; Danny Yakoub
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 7.  Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jing-Yu Deng; Han Liang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Serum CA 19-9 as a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jae-Cheol Jo; Min-Hee Ryu; Dong-Hoe Koo; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Hwa Jung Kim; Tae Won Kim; Kee Don Choi; Gin Hyug Lee; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Jeong Hwan Yook; Sung Tae Oh; Byung Sik Kim; Jin-Ho Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.601

9.  Comparison of gastric cancer survival after R0 resection in the US and China.

Authors:  Ping Li; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ashley Russo; Priyanka Kasbekar; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 10.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prognostic Role of M6A-Associated Immune Genes and Cluster-Related Tumor Microenvironment Analysis: A Multi-Omics Practice in Stomach Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Na Luo; Min Fu; Yiling Zhang; Xiaoyu Li; Wenjun Zhu; Feng Yang; Ziqi Chen; Qi Mei; Xiaohong Peng; Lulu Shen; Yuanyuan Zhang; Qianxia Li; Guangyuan Hu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Identification of Two Exosomal miRNAs in Circulating Blood of Cancer Patients by Using Integrative Transcriptome and Network Analysis.

Authors:  Andrés Rincón-Riveros; Josefa Antonia Rodríguez; Victoria E Villegas; Liliana López-Kleine
Journal:  Noncoding RNA       Date:  2022-05-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.