Literature DB >> 35029903

Relationship between marital status and survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma: A SEER-based study.

Ying Wu1, Pei-Zhen Zhu1, Yin-Qiao Chen1, Jie Chen2, Lu Xu1, Huayi Zhang1.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Numerous studies have focused on whether the marital status has an impact on the prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, but none have focused on lung adenocarcinoma.We selected 61,928 eligible cases with lung adenocarcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2016 and analyzed the impact of marital status on cancer-specific survival (CSS) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.We confirmed that sex, age, race, cancer TNM stage and grade, therapeutic schedule, household income, and marital status were independent prognostic factors for lung adenocarcinoma CSS. Multivariate Cox regression showed that widowed patients had worse CSS (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.31, P < .001) compared with married patients. Subgroup analysis showed consistent results regardless of sex, age, cancer grade, and TNM stage. However, the trend was not significant for patients with grade IV cancer.These results suggest that marital status is first identified as an independent prognostic factor for CSS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, with a clear association between widowhood and a high risk of cancer-specific mortality. Psychological and social support are thus important for patients with lung adenocarcinoma, especially unmarried patients.
Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35029903      PMCID: PMC8735761          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

Lung cancer is considered the most common cancer worldwide, affecting 1.8 million people and accounting for 13% of all diagnosed cancers. It is also the main cause of cancer-related death worldwide, being responsible for 19% of all cancer-related deaths representing about 1.6 million people.[ Despite new treatments, the 5-year survival rate remains as low as 12% to 15%.[ In the last 2 decades, adenocarcinoma has replaced squamous cell cancer as the most prevalent subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC),[ accounting for 40% of all lung cancer patients.[ Although previous studies have examined the impacts of demographic factors (e.g., age and sex) and clinicopathologic factors (e.g., presence of pulmonary symptoms, larger tumor size, nonsquamous histology, vascular invasion) on cancer survival,[ the impact of marriage is still unclear. Wu et al[ demonstrated that marriage was protective on the survival of patients with NSCLC; however, Kumi et al[ and Jatoi et al[ reached opposing conclusions. In addition, as far as we have known, previous researchers did not pay attention to the impact of marital status on the survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. In the present study, we aimed to explore the relationship between marital status and the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma by analyzing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry database.

Materials and methods

Data source

All data in our study were acquired from the SEER 18 registry, which is currently the largest publicly available cancer database, covering approximately 28% of the US population.[ We used the Incidence-SEER 18 Registries Custom Data with additional treatment fields, Nov 2018 Sub (1975– 2016 varying), which contains information on patient demographics and cancer characteristics, including sex, age at diagnosis, race, marital status, cancer TNM stage, and grade at diagnosis, treatment regimen, and patient survival time. We took 2004 as the first year of the study, given that several employed covariates were introduced in SEER in that year.[ Ethical approval was waived by the institutional review board of the First People's Hospital of Yongkang City because SEER data is publicly accessible and deidentified.

Patient selection

Patients with International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3) site code C34.0-C34.9 from 2004 to 2016 were identified in the SEER database. Unless they were excluded by the following criteria: ICD-O-3 morphology code did not indicate lung adenocarcinoma (8140); diagnosis of cancer made at autopsy; age at diagnosis <18 years; prior malignancy diagnosed; cause of death unknown; survival time unknown or <1 month; and incomplete clinical information.

Study variables

Information on the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics was extracted from the database, including sex, age at diagnosis, race, tumor grade, AJCC TNM stage, marital status, surgical information, radiotherapy information, and chemotherapy information. Group assignments were made via the following factors: age (<65 and ≥65 years old); race (White, Black, and other); marital status (married, single, separated, divorced, and widowed); separated and divorced patients were combined into a single category in alignment with previous studies.[); tumor grade (I, well-differentiated; II, moderately differentiated; III, poorly differentiated; IV undifferentiated); surgery (yes or no); and radiotherapy and chemotherapy (yes or no/unknown). Median household income was calculated to represent socioeconomic status. The primary study endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS). For CSS analysis, deaths from lung adenocarcinoma were considered events, while survivors or deaths attributed to other causes were censored.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages and compared using χ2 tests across groups according to marital status. CSS was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Factors with a P value <.05 in log-rank tests were entered into the multivariate Cox regression model. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software (version 24; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Statistical significance was set at a 2-sided P < .05.

Results

Baseline patient characteristics

We selected 61,928 eligible cases with lung adenocarcinoma (29,460 males and 32,468 females) through the SEER database from 2004 to 2016. Of these, 33,713 patients (54.4%) were married, 8804 were divorced (14.2%), 9516 were single (15.4%), and 9895 were widowed (16.0%). Most married patients were men (55.6%), and most widowed patients were women (77.6%). Most widowed patients were ≥65 years old (87.4%), while most single patients were <65 years old (61.5%). Single patients were more likely to have TNM stage IV cancer (57.1%). Married patients had the highest proportions of patients with surgery (28.1%) and chemotherapy (60.5%). While widowed patients had the lowest proportions of patients with radiotherapy (60.3%) and chemotherapy (57.6%). The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

CharacteristicMarriedDivorcedSingleWidowedTotalP value
Number of patients33,713 (54.4)8804 (14.2)9516 (15.4)9895 (16)61,928 (100)
Sex<.001
Male18,731 (55.6)3742 (42.5)4767 (50.1)2220 (22.4)29,460 (47.6)
Female14,982 (44.4)5062 (57.5)4749 (49.9)7675 (77.6)32,468 (52.4)
Age<.001
<6513,783 (40.9)4326 (49.1)5850 (61.5)1251 (12.6)25,210 (40.7)
≥6519,930 (59.1)4478 (50.9)3666 (38.5)8644 (87.4)36,718 (59.3)
Race<.001
White26,685 (79.2)6942 (78.9)6217 (65.3)7911 (79.9)47,755 (77.1)
Black2759 (8.2)1384 (15.7)2637 (27.7)1042 (10.5)7822 (12.6)
Other4269 (12.7)478 (5.4)662 (7)942 (9.5)6351 (10.3)
Grade<.001
I2549 (7.6)597 (6.8)542 (5.7)826 (8.3)4514 (7.3)
II7176 (21.3)1742 (19.8)1739 (18.3)2111 (21.3)12,768 (20.6)
III8714 (25.8)2301 (26.1)2614 (27.5)2218 (22.4)15,847 (25.6)
IV176 (0.5)49 (0.6)58 (0.6)45 (0.5)328 (0.5)
Unknown15,098 (44.8)4115 (46.7)4563 (48)4695 (47.4)28,471 (46)
TNM stage<.001
I7111 (21.1)1904 (21.6)1784 (18.7)2490 (25.2)7111 (21.5)
II2315 (6.9)639 (7.3)623 (6.5)796 (8)2315 (7.1)
III5930 (17.6)1649 (18.7)1675 (17.6)1716 (17.3)5930 (17.7)
IV18,357 (54.5)4612 (52.4)5434 (57.1)4893 (49.4)18,357 (53.8)
Surgery<.001
Yes9467 (28.1)2322 (26.4)2125 (22.3)2286 (23.1)16,200 (26.2)
No24,246 (71.9)6482 (73.6)7391 (77.7)7609 (76.9)45,728 (73.8)
Radiotherapy<.001
Yes14,900 (44.2)4077 (46.3)4252 (44.7)3933 (39.7)27,162 (43.9)
None, refused or unknown18,813 (55.8)4727 (53.7)5264 (55.3)5962 (60.3)34,766 (56.1)
Chemotherapy<.001
Yes20,380 (60.5)4850 (55.1)5270 (55.4)4193 (42.4)34,693 (56)
No/unknown13,333 (39.5)3954 (44.9)4246 (44.6)5702 (57.6)27,235 (44)
Cancer-specific death<.001
Events20,452 (60.7)5469 (62.1)6031 (63.4)6112 (61.8)38,064 (61.5)
Censored13,261 (39.3)3335 (37.9)3485 (36.6)3783 (38.2)13,261 (38.5)
Median household income<.001
<39468319 (24.7)2374 (27)2235 (23.5)2418 (24.4)15,346 (24.8)
3946–44948118 (24.1)2178 (24.7)2727 (28.7)2469 (25)15,492 (25)
4494–54008384 (24.9)2277 (25.9)2355 (24.7)2544 (25.7)15,560 (25.1)
≥54008892 (26.4)1975 (22.4)2199 (23.1)2464 (24.9)15,530 (25.1)
Baseline characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Effect of marital status on lung adenocarcinoma CSS

We estimated the lung adenocarcinoma CSS by the Kaplan–Meier method and analyzed it using log-rank tests. CSS was strongly associated with marital status (P < .001, Fig. 1), and married patients had the highest CSS (28.3%) (Table 2). Multivariate analysis revealed that divorced (hazard ratio (HR) =1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.15, P < .001), single (HR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.05–1.15, P < .001), and widowed (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.15–1.26, P < .001) patients had higher risks of cancer-specific death compared with married patients after adjusting the covariates. In addition, sex, race, cancer TNM stage and grade, therapeutic schedule, and median household income were also identified as independent factors related to CSS. Briefly, male sex, higher tumor grade, higher TNM stage, low median household income, no surgery, and no chemotherapy were associated with higher risks of lung adenocarcinoma-specific death.
Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curves of lung adenocarcinoma cancer-specific survival by marital status.

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of lung adenocarcinoma cancer-specific survival.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
Variable5-yr CSSLog rank χ2 testP valueHR (95% CI)P value
Sex634.3<.001
 Male23.8%Reference
 Female31.1%0.77 (0.75–0.8)<.001
Age4.8.030
 <6527.5%Reference
 ≥6527.8%1.18 (1.14–1.22)<.001
Race89.0<.001
 White28.1%Reference
 Black25.3%0.97 (0.93–1.02).268
 Other27.1%0.77 (0.73–0.81)<.001
Grade6887.4<.001
 I63.7%Reference
 II46.4%1.38 (1.29–1.46)<.001
 III26.7%1.79 (1.68–1.9)<.001
 IV29.3%1.58 (1.36–1.84)<.001
TNM stage20450.4<.001
 I71.6%Reference
 II49.9%2.47 (2.29–2.65)<.001
 III26.6%3.81 (3.57–4.06)<.001
 IV7.1%7.27 (6.84–7.73)<.001
Surgery14212.2<.001
 No12.4%Reference
 Yes67.0%0.39 (0.37–0.41)
<0.001
Radiotherapy1571.4<.001
 No34.6%Reference
 Yes18.3%1.08 (1.05–1.12)
<0.001
Chemotherapy1616.5<.001
 No/unknown41.0%Reference
 Yes17.5%0.63 (0.61–0.65)
<0.001
Median household income144.9<.001
 <394625.9%Reference
 3946–449426.5%0.9 (0.87–0.93)<.001
 4494–540028.4%0.99 (0.96–1.02).452
 ≥540029.8%0.99 (0.96–1.02).372
Marital status108.3<.001
 Married28.3%Reference
 Divorced27.6%1.1 (1.05–1.15)<.001
 Single26.5%1.1 (1.05–1.15)<.001
 Widowed26.9%1.21 (1.15–1.26)<.001
Kaplan–Meier curves of lung adenocarcinoma cancer-specific survival by marital status. Univariate and multivariate analyses of lung adenocarcinoma cancer-specific survival.

Subgroup analysis by sex, cancer grade, and TNM stage

We further investigated the prognostic effect of marital status according to sex, cancer grade, and TNM stage using log-rank tests and the Cox regression analysis. Widowed patients had the worse 5-year CSS in both sexes, and widowed men had the worst 5-year CSS (Supplementary Figure 1). Cox regression analyses indicated that widowed patients had a greater risk of cancer-specific mortality compared with their married counterparts (P < .001) regardless of sex. The prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma varied according to cancer grade. As shown in Supplementary Table 1, married patients had the highest 5-year CSS for all cancer grades, and widowhood was identified as an independent risk factor (Supplementary Figure 2, P < .05). Similarly, widowed patients had the worst 5-year CSS in all TNM stage subgroups, and marital status was significantly related to CSS (Supplementary Figure 3). In contrast to married patients, widowed patients had significantly lower 5 year-CSS in the TNM I, TNM III, and TNM IV groups but not in TNM stage II patients (Supplementary Table 1).

Discussion

The study revealed that marital status may be an independent prognostic factor in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, with and 5 year CSS in married patients were higher than divorced, widowed, and single patients, regardless of sex, cancer grade, and TNM stage. Our key findings are in line with previous reports with other types of cancer.[ Several hypotheses have been proposed to elucidate the poorer prognosis in widowed patients. One possible cause may be the undertreatment for this situation. Zhou et al[ similarly found that widowed patients with gastric cancer were more likely to decline the surgery. Undertreatment may be attributed to the lack of required support from a spouse, and a lack of financial resources, given that spousal support can assist with activities of daily living,[ compliance with the prescribed treatment protocol, and receiving medical assistance.[ In addition, married patients with more financial resources are more likely to access medical care for early detection and timely and advanced treatment.[ A lack of these advantages thus means that widowed patients are prone to undertreatment. Low adherence to the prescribed treatments may also be a factor. Cohen et al[ found that unmarried patients always had poorer adherence to treatments than married patients. In breast cancer patients, a low compliance rate to tamoxifen was related to an increased risk of death,[ and delayed or missed radiotherapy increased the risk of locoregional recurrence and death in patients with head/neck cancers.[ Psychological support is also an important factor. People diagnosed with cancer may suffer from depression, anxiety, and psychosocial distress,[ which are deleterious to the endocrine and immune systems.[ Immune dysfunction may in turn lead to a decrease of natural-killer cell cytotoxicity,[ while endocrine dysfunction affects the secretion of catecholamines and cortisol.[ These mechanisms may accelerate cancer development and metastasis.[ Furthermore, a significant decrease in medical compliance was observed in patients with clinical depression,[ and psychological support was shown to improve the prognosis among married patients by having a spouse to help fight against negative emotions and provide social supports strongly.[ In the current study, after controlling the treatment variables including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, we could not distinguish if patients received standard of care or not and exclude the effect of treatment. Therefore, inadequate treatment is still a possible reason for the poor survival of unmarried patients. In accordance with the previous research,[ the current study also showed that male patients had a poorer prognosis. Further analysis of the effect of marital status on CSS showed that widowed male patients had the worst 5-year CSS. This may be because, although both sexes suffer from the loss of a spouse, men are subsequently more prone to develop depressive symptoms.[ Numerous studies[ have analyzed the relationship between marital status and NSCLC, but none have focused on lung adenocarcinoma. Treatment for patients with NSCLC varies according to pathological type, which may affect the results. However, the present study only enrolled patients with lung adenocarcinoma. In addition, we further investigated the prognostic effect of marital status according to sex, which has not been examined in previous studies, and analyzed a larger sample size (61,928 eligible patients) over a longer period (2004–2016). This study had some limitations. First, it was a retrospective study with clear inherent limitations. Second, some important confounding variables that could not be obtained from the SEER database such as smoking habits, complications, and cancer-targeted therapy, and other details on treatment. Third, marital status is documented at diagnosis, but it may change in the follow-up. In addition, the database does not contain psychosocial distress measurement which may be linked to the prognosis of patients.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates the marital status seems to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Compared with married patients, widowed, divorced, or single patients showed a significantly higher risk of cancer-specific mortality. These results highlight the importance of providing adequate psychological and social support for cancer patients, especially unmarried patients.

Author contributions

(I) Conception and design: Ying Wu, Peizhen Zhu, Lu Xu (II) Administrative support: Ying Wu, Peizhen Zhu, Lu Xu (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Ying Wu, Yinqiao Chen, Huayi Zhang (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Ying Wu, Yinqiao Chen, Huayi Zhang (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Ying Wu, Peizhen Zhu, Jie Chen (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors Conceptualization: Ying Wu, Pei-Zhen Zhu, Lu Xu. Data curation: Ying Wu. Formal analysis: Ying Wu, Jie Chen. Investigation: Ying Wu, Lu Xu. Methodology: Ying Wu. Project administration: Pei-Zhen Zhu, Huayi Zhang. Resources: Ying Wu, Pei-Zhen Zhu, Yin-Qiao Chen, Huayi Zhang. Software: Jie Chen. Supervision: Ying Wu, Yin-Qiao Chen. Visualization: Ying Wu. Writing – original draft: Ying Wu, Pei-Zhen Zhu, Yin-Qiao Chen. Writing – review & editing: Ying Wu, Pei-Zhen Zhu, Yin-Qiao Chen, Jie Chen, Lu Xu, Huayi Zhang.
  34 in total

1.  Genome-wide association study of familial lung cancer.

Authors:  Jinyoung Byun; Ann G Schwartz; Christine Lusk; Angela S Wenzlaff; Mariza de Andrade; Diptasri Mandal; Colette Gaba; Ping Yang; Ming You; Elena Y Kupert; Marshall W Anderson; Younghun Han; Yafang Li; David Qian; Adrienne Stilp; Cathy Laurie; Sarah Nelson; Wenying Zheng; Rayjean J Hung; Valerie Gaborieau; James Mckay; Paul Brennan; Neil E Caporaso; Maria Teresa Landi; Xifeng Wu; John R McLaughlin; Yonathan Brhane; Yohan Bossé; Susan M Pinney; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 2.  Impact of stress on cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Myrthala Moreno-Smith; Susan K Lutgendorf; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Does marital status impact survival and quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer? Observations from the mayo clinic lung cancer cohort.

Authors:  Aminah Jatoi; Paul Novotny; Stephen Cassivi; Matthew M Clark; David Midthun; Christi A Patten; Jeff Sloan; Ping Yang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-12

Review 4.  Family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer: understanding and minimizing the burden of care.

Authors:  William E Haley
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: pathways and mechanisms.

Authors:  Michael H Antoni; Susan K Lutgendorf; Steven W Cole; Firdaus S Dhabhar; Sandra E Sephton; Paige Green McDonald; Michael Stefanek; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Marital status, social support and survival after curative resection in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kumi Saito-Nakaya; Naoki Nakaya; Maiko Fujimori; Nobuya Akizuki; Eisho Yoshikawa; Makoto Kobayakawa; Kanji Nagai; Yutaka Nishiwaki; Yoshitaka Tsubono; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Marital status independently predicts non-small cell lung cancer survival: a propensity-adjusted SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Zongwei Chen; Kanhua Yin; Difan Zheng; Jie Gu; Jizhuang Luo; Shuai Wang; Haiquan Chen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Marital status and survival in pancreatic cancer patients: a SEER based analysis.

Authors:  Michael Baine; Freshta Sahak; Chi Lin; Subhankar Chakraborty; Elizabeth Lyden; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Marital status and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of 70006 patients in the SEER database.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Zisheng Ai; Guotong Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-06

10.  The value of high adherence to tamoxifen in women with breast cancer: a community-based cohort study.

Authors:  C McCowan; S Wang; A M Thompson; B Makubate; D J Petrie
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.