Literature DB >> 31928404

Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update.

Kimberly H Allison1, M Elizabeth H Hammond2, Mitchell Dowsett3, Shannon E McKernin4, Lisa A Carey5, Patrick L Fitzgibbons6, Daniel F Hayes7, Sunil R Lakhani8,9, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor10, Jane Perlmutter11, Charles M Perou5, Meredith M Regan12, David L Rimm13, W Fraser Symmans10, Emina E Torlakovic14,15, Leticia Varella16, Giuseppe Viale17,18, Tracey F Weisberg19, Lisa M McShane20, Antonio C Wolff21.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer guideline.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary international Expert Panel was convened to update the clinical practice guideline recommendations informed by a systematic review of the medical literature. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Expert Panel continues to recommend ER testing of invasive breast cancers by validated immunohistochemistry as the standard for predicting which patients may benefit from endocrine therapy, and no other assays are recommended for this purpose. Breast cancer samples with 1% to 100% of tumor nuclei positive should be interpreted as ER positive. However, the Expert Panel acknowledges that there are limited data on endocrine therapy benefit for cancers with 1% to 10% of cells staining ER positive. Samples with these results should be reported using a new reporting category, ER Low Positive, with a recommended comment. A sample is considered ER negative if < 1% or 0% of tumor cell nuclei are immunoreactive. Additional strategies recommended to promote optimal performance, interpretation, and reporting of cases with an initial low to no ER staining result include establishing a laboratory-specific standard operating procedure describing additional steps used by the laboratory to confirm/adjudicate results. The status of controls should be reported for cases with 0% to 10% staining. Similar principles apply to PgR testing, which is used primarily for prognostic purposes in the setting of an ER-positive cancer. Testing of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) for ER is recommended to determine potential benefit of endocrine therapies to reduce risk of future breast cancer, while testing DCIS for PgR is considered optional. Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31928404     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  146 in total

1.  Prognostic value of response evaluation based on breast MRI after neoadjuvant treatment: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Almir G V Bitencourt; Barbara S Pires; Vinicius F Calsavara; Erika M S Negrão; Juliana A Souza; Luciana Graziano; Camila S Guatelli; Fabiana B Makdissi; Solange M Sanches; Monique C Tavares; Cynthia A B T Osório; Marina De Brot; Elvira F Marques; Rubens Chojniak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Magee Equations™ and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2-negative breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Rohit Bhargava; Nicole N Esposito; Siobhan M OʹConnor; Zaibo Li; Bradley M Turner; Ioana Moisini; Aditi Ranade; Ronald P Harris; Dylan V Miller; Xiaoxian Li; Harrison Moosavi; Beth Z Clark; Adam M Brufsky; David J Dabbs
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Molecular patterns in salivary duct carcinoma identify prognostic subgroups.

Authors:  Ruta Gupta; Mark J Cowley; Simon A Mueller; Marie-Emilie A Gauthier; James Blackburn; John P Grady; Spiridoula Kraitsek; Elektra Hajdu; Matthias S Dettmer; Jane E Dahlstrom; C Soon Lee; Peter P Luk; Bing Yu; Roland Giger; Sarah Kummerfeld; Jonathan R Clark
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Understanding PD-L1 Testing in Breast Cancer: A Practical Approach.

Authors:  Ramona Erber; Arndt Hartmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Prognostic and predictive parameters in breast pathology: a pathologist's primer.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  The co-presence of high-risk human papillomaviruses and Epstein-Barr virus is linked with tumor grade and stage in Qatari women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ishita Gupta; Ayesha Jabeen; Reem Al-Sarraf; Hanan Farghaly; Semir Vranic; Ali A Sultan; Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa; Hamda Al-Thawadi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Effect of level of hormone-receptor expression on treatment outcomes of "triple-positive" early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Sara Edaily; Sereen Iweir; Mourad Salam; Yacob Saleh; Maher Sughayer; Osama Salama; Rawan Mustafa; Yosra Al-Masri; Rayan Bater; Ayat Taqash
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Management of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer.

Authors:  Elaine M Walsh; Karen L Smith; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 9.  Histology of Luminal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ramona Erber; Arndt Hartmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Endocrine Therapy in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Katja Krauss; Elmar Stickeler
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.