BACKGROUND: Little is known about how the interplay among health-related behaviors impacts self-rated health (SRH). We examined the clustering of physical activity (PA), sleep, diet, and specific screen-based device use, and the associations between the emergent clusters and SRH among Brazilian adolescents. METHOD: The data used in this cross-sectional study were from the baseline of the Movimente Program. Self-reported data were analyzed. SRH was recorded as a 5-point scale (from poor to excellent). Daily duration of exposure to the computer, the television, the cell phone, and games; PA; sleep; and weekly consumption of fruits and vegetables and ultra-processed foods were included in a Two-Step cluster analysis. Multilevel ordered logistic regressions assessed the associations between the clusters and SRH. RESULTS: The data of 750 students (girls: 52.8%, 13.1 ± 1.0 years) were analyzed. Good SRH was more prevalent (52.8%). Three clusters were identified: the Phubbers (50.53%; characterized by the longest cell phone use duration, shortest gaming and computer use, lowest PA levels, and low consumption of fruits and vegetables), the Gamers (22.80%; longest gaming and computer use duration, PA < sample average, highest intake of ultra-processed foods), and a Healthier cluster (26.67%; physically active, use of all screen-based devices < sample average, and healthier dietary patterns). For both Gamers (-0.85; 95% CI -1.24, -0.46) and Phubbers (-0.71; 95% CI -1.04, -0.38), it was found a decrease in the log-odds of being in a higher SRH category compared with the Healthier cluster. CONCLUSION: Specific clusters represent increased health-related risk. Assuming the interdependence of health-related behaviors is indispensable for accurately managing health promotion actions for distinguishable groups.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about how the interplay among health-related behaviors impacts self-rated health (SRH). We examined the clustering of physical activity (PA), sleep, diet, and specific screen-based device use, and the associations between the emergent clusters and SRH among Brazilian adolescents. METHOD: The data used in this cross-sectional study were from the baseline of the Movimente Program. Self-reported data were analyzed. SRH was recorded as a 5-point scale (from poor to excellent). Daily duration of exposure to the computer, the television, the cell phone, and games; PA; sleep; and weekly consumption of fruits and vegetables and ultra-processed foods were included in a Two-Step cluster analysis. Multilevel ordered logistic regressions assessed the associations between the clusters and SRH. RESULTS: The data of 750 students (girls: 52.8%, 13.1 ± 1.0 years) were analyzed. Good SRH was more prevalent (52.8%). Three clusters were identified: the Phubbers (50.53%; characterized by the longest cell phone use duration, shortest gaming and computer use, lowest PA levels, and low consumption of fruits and vegetables), the Gamers (22.80%; longest gaming and computer use duration, PA < sample average, highest intake of ultra-processed foods), and a Healthier cluster (26.67%; physically active, use of all screen-based devices < sample average, and healthier dietary patterns). For both Gamers (-0.85; 95% CI -1.24, -0.46) and Phubbers (-0.71; 95% CI -1.04, -0.38), it was found a decrease in the log-odds of being in a higher SRH category compared with the Healthier cluster. CONCLUSION: Specific clusters represent increased health-related risk. Assuming the interdependence of health-related behaviors is indispensable for accurately managing health promotion actions for distinguishable groups.
Authors: Øystein Hetlevik; Tina L Vie; Eivind Meland; Hans J Breidablik; David Jahanlu Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2018-04-29 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Teija Nuutinen; Elviira Lehto; Carola Ray; Eva Roos; Jari Villberg; Jorma Tynjälä Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Tina Løkke Vie; Karl Ove Hufthammer; Turid Lingaas Holmen; Eivind Meland; Hans Johan Breidablik Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Kate E Parker; Jo Salmon; Sarah A Costigan; Karen Villanueva; Helen L Brown; Anna Timperio Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Bevan Adrian Craig; Darren Peter Morton; Peter John Morey; Lillian Marton Kent; Alva Barry Gane; Terry Leslie Butler; Paul Meredith Rankin; Kevin Ross Price Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Alexsandra da Silva Bandeira; Giovani Firpo Del Duca; Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti; Sofia Wolker Manta; Pablo Magno Silveira; Larissa Dos Santos Leonel; Leandro F M Rezende; Kelly Samara Silva Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 3.752