| Literature DB >> 35028918 |
Jeeyoung Hong1,2, Suk Wha Kim3, Hyunjin Joo3,4, Hyoun-Joong Kong5,6,7,8.
Abstract
AIMS: This study aimed to develop a smartphone mirroring-based telepresence exercise program that can be performed at home while allowing for real-time feedback by instructors.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Body composition; Obesity; Physical function; Smartphone
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35028918 PMCID: PMC8758229 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-02033-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res ISSN: 1594-0667 Impact factor: 3.636
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study design
Fig. 2Overview of the telepresence exercise platform using web real-time communication technology developed for this study in obese older women
Exercise program design for the intervention and control groups in obese older women (n = 29)
| Program part | Exerciseindividual exercises type | Intensity (RPE) | Time (min) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warm-up | Stretching | 11–13 | 5 | ||
| Main exercise | Aerobic | Walking in place Simple gymnastics | 12–16 | 10–30 | |
| Resistance (with resistance bands) | Seated chair leg flexion Seated chair hip joint rotation Standing hip extension Standing hip flexion Standing knee flexion Standing knee extension Wall squat | ||||
| 11–15 | |||||
| Cool-down | Stretching | 11–13 | 5 | ||
RPE rating of perceived exertion
Fig. 3Set-up for the smartphone mirroring-based telepresence exercise program used in this randomized controlled trial in obese older South Korean women
Baseline physical characteristics of obese older women (n = 29) undergoing an exercise program
| Intervention group ( | Control group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 78.41 ± 2.84 | 81.05 ± 3.96 | 0.06 |
| Weight (kg) | 60.10 ± 7.56 | 57.15 ± 8.78 | 0.35 |
| Height (cm) | 149.20 ± 5.13 | 148.84 ± 4.97 | 0.85 |
| Percent body fat (%) | 41.13 ± 7.14 | 41.87 ± 5.84 | 0.76 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation of physical measurements. P values represent homogeneity and were obtained using an independent t test
Changes in body composition in obese older women (n = 29) undergoing a smartphone mirroring-based telepresence exercise program or group exercises
| Group | Pre-test | Post-test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | IG CG | 60.10 ± 7.56 57.15 ± 8.78 | 59.47 ± 6.69 56.36 ± 8.96† | Time Group Time × group | 0.004 0.336 0.713 |
| Percent body fat (%) | IG CG | 41.13 ± 7.14 41.87 ± 5.84 | 39.76 ± 7.29* 40.32 ± 6.03† | Time Group Time × group | 0.000 0.791 0.771 |
| Skeletal muscle mass (kg) | IG CG | 18.45 ± 1.72 16.91 ± 2.07 | 18.73 ± 1.45 17.09 ± 2.10* | Time Group Time × group | 0.029 0.034 0.645 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. P values represent two-way repeated-measures ANOVA
IG intervention group, CG control group
*P < 0.05, †P < 0.01
Changes in the short physical performance battery score and grip strength in obese older women (n = 29) undergoing a smartphone mirroring-based telepresence exercise program or group exercises
| Group | Pre-test | Post-test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPPB (score) | IG CG | 8.25 ± 2.26 4.88 ± 2.61 | 8.91 ± 1.78 5.47 ± 2.87 | Time Group Time × group | 0.244 0.000 0.941 |
| Right grip (kg) | IG CG | 17.37 ± 3.23 13.91 ± 4.07 | 27.62 ± 27.46 16.47 ± 3.06** | Time Group Time × group | 0.075 0.039 0.276 |
| Left grip (kg) | IG CG | 15.79 ± 4.31 13.50 ± 4.30 | 18.08 ± 2.42** 15.11 ± 2.93 | Time Group Time × group | 0.002 0.042 0.563 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. P values represent a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance
SPPB Short Physical Performance Battery, IG intervention group, CG control group
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01