BACKGROUND: In elders, decreased muscle mass (sarcopenia) and increased fat mass (obesity) may contribute to difficulties with physical function. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the association of obesity, sarcopenia, and their combination (sarcopenic-obesity) with self-reported difficulties performing physical function in a cohort of community-dwelling elderly women. DESIGN: We assessed muscle and fat mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and self-reported difficulties with physical function in 1308 healthy women aged > or =75 y. Sarcopenia was defined as an appendicular skeletal muscle mass < or =2 SD below the mean in a young female reference group. Obesity was defined as a percentage body fat above the 60th percentile. Thirty-six sarcopenic-obese, 90 purely sarcopenic, 435 purely obese, and 747 women with a healthy body composition were studied. Anthropometric measures, health status, lifestyle habits, and self-reported difficulties with 6 different physical functions were obtained. RESULTS: Compared with women with a healthy body composition and after adjustment for confounders, purely sarcopenic women had no increased odds of having difficulties for all of the physical functions assessed, purely obese women had a 44-79% higher odds of having difficulties with most of the physical functions assessed (P < 0.05), and sarcopenic-obese women had a 2.60 higher odds of having difficulty climbing stairs and a 2.35 higher odds of having difficulty going down stairs (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is not associated with physical difficulties in the absence of obesity. However, in the presence of obesity, sarcopenia tends to add difficulty for some physical functions.
BACKGROUND: In elders, decreased muscle mass (sarcopenia) and increased fat mass (obesity) may contribute to difficulties with physical function. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the association of obesity, sarcopenia, and their combination (sarcopenic-obesity) with self-reported difficulties performing physical function in a cohort of community-dwelling elderly women. DESIGN: We assessed muscle and fat mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and self-reported difficulties with physical function in 1308 healthy women aged > or =75 y. Sarcopenia was defined as an appendicular skeletal muscle mass < or =2 SD below the mean in a young female reference group. Obesity was defined as a percentage body fat above the 60th percentile. Thirty-six sarcopenic-obese, 90 purely sarcopenic, 435 purely obese, and 747 women with a healthy body composition were studied. Anthropometric measures, health status, lifestyle habits, and self-reported difficulties with 6 different physical functions were obtained. RESULTS: Compared with women with a healthy body composition and after adjustment for confounders, purely sarcopenic women had no increased odds of having difficulties for all of the physical functions assessed, purely obesewomen had a 44-79% higher odds of having difficulties with most of the physical functions assessed (P < 0.05), and sarcopenic-obesewomen had a 2.60 higher odds of having difficulty climbing stairs and a 2.35 higher odds of having difficulty going down stairs (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Sarcopenia is not associated with physical difficulties in the absence of obesity. However, in the presence of obesity, sarcopenia tends to add difficulty for some physical functions.
Authors: Susan Storey; Andrea Cohee; Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi; Eric Vachon; Patrick Monahan; Julie Otte; Timothy E Stump; David Cella; Victoria Champion Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: René Rizzoli; Jean-Yves Reginster; Jean-François Arnal; Ivan Bautmans; Charlotte Beaudart; Heike Bischoff-Ferrari; Emmanuel Biver; Steven Boonen; Maria-Luisa Brandi; Arkadi Chines; Cyrus Cooper; Sol Epstein; Roger A Fielding; Bret Goodpaster; John A Kanis; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Andrea Laslop; Vincenzo Malafarina; Leocadio Rodriguez Mañas; Bruce H Mitlak; Richard O Oreffo; Jean Petermans; Kieran Reid; Yves Rolland; Avan Aihie Sayer; Yannis Tsouderos; Marjolein Visser; Olivier Bruyère Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: A Y Bijlsma; C G M Meskers; N van den Eshof; R G Westendorp; S Sipilä; L Stenroth; E Sillanpää; J S McPhee; D A Jones; M V Narici; H Gapeyeva; M Pääsuke; T Voit; Y Barnouin; J Y Hogrel; G Butler-Browne; A B Maier Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2013-07-02
Authors: Lucy Wang; John D Crawford; Simone Reppermund; Julian Trollor; Lesley Campbell; Bernhard T Baune; Perminder Sachdev; Henry Brodaty; Katherine Samaras; Evelyn Smith Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Thomas W Buford; Donovan J Lott; Emanuele Marzetti; Stephanie E Wohlgemuth; Krista Vandenborne; Marco Pahor; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: L Gregorio; J Brindisi; A Kleppinger; R Sullivan; K M Mangano; J D Bihuniak; A M Kenny; J E Kerstetter; K L Insogna Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.075