Literature DB >> 35028702

Predictors of postoperative complications from stress urinary incontinence procedures: a NSQIP database study.

Marissa L Bonus1, Douglas Luchristt2, Oluwateniola Brown2, Sarah Collins2, Kimberly Kenton2, C Emi Bretschneider2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There are few studies examining patient risk factors for postoperative complications following midurethral sling (MUS) placement for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The objective of this study was to describe 30-day postoperative complications after MUS using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Secondary objectives included rates of readmission and patient factors associated with postoperative complications and readmissions following MUS.
METHODS: We identified 16,491 women who underwent MUS for SUI between 2014 and 2018. American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification, medical comorbidities, readmission, reoperation, and 30-day postoperative complications were extracted. Outcomes included the 30-day postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperations. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses, and multivariate logistic regression were used.
RESULTS: The majority of patients were white (66.9%) and had an ASA classification II (60.9%). Postoperative complications occurred in 4.2% of patients; 1.5% required readmission and 1.0% required reoperation. The most common complication was urinary tract infection (3.4%). Using multivariate logistic regression, older age, i.e., ≥80 years of age, was associated with increased odds of complication (aOR 1.77, 95%CI 1.14-2.72) and readmission (aOR 3.84, 95%CI 1.76-8.66). ASA class III and IV were associated with increased odds of complications (aOR 1.55, 95%CI 1.13-2.14, and aOR 3.06, 95% CI 1.48-5.86 respectively) and readmissions. Women of Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander descent ("other") were associated with increased postoperative complications (aOR 1.51, 95%CI 1.07-2.07).
CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications following MUS are rare. Factors associated with complications following MUS for SUI include age, ASA class, and women of "other" race.
© 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Midurethral sling; Patient characteristics; Postoperative complications; Race; Stress urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35028702     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05047-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   1.932


  21 in total

1.  Risk factors for postoperative urinary tract infection following midurethral sling procedures.

Authors:  Melike Doganay; Sabri Cavkaytar; Mahmut Kuntay Kokanali; Irfan Ozer; Orhan Seyfi Aksakal; Salim Erkaya
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 2.  Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Abigail A Ford; Lynne Rogerson; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Joseph A Ogah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-31

3.  Perioperative Safety of Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Elderly and Frail Patients.

Authors:  Graham C Chapman; David Sheyn; Emily A Slopnick; Adonis K Hijaz; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Jeffrey Mangel; Sherif A El-Nashar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Pamela J Levin; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Readmission and reoperation after midurethral sling.

Authors:  Erik D Hokenstad; Amy E Glasgow; Elizabeth B Habermann; John A Occhino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Melville; Wayne Katon; Kristin Delaney; Katherine Newton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-14

Review 7.  Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Roger R Dmochowski; Jerry M Blaivas; E Ann Gormley; Saad Juma; Mickey M Karram; Deborah J Lightner; Karl M Luber; Eric S Rovner; David R Staskin; J Christian Winters; Rodney A Appell; Linda E Whetter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation.

Authors:  Katie Propst; David M O'Sullivan; Paul K Tulikangas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Two-Year Results of Burch Compared With Midurethral Sling With Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Emanuel C Trabuco; Brian J Linder; Christopher J Klingele; Roberta E Blandon; John A Occhino; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Julien Labrie; Bary L C M Berghmans; Kathelijn Fischer; Alfredo L Milani; Ileana van der Wijk; Dina J C Smalbraak; Astrid Vollebregt; René P Schellart; Giuseppe C M Graziosi; J Marinus van der Ploeg; Joseph F G M Brouns; E Stella M Tiersma; Annette G Groenendijk; Piet Scholten; Ben Willem Mol; Elisabeth E Blokhuis; Albert H Adriaanse; Aaltje Schram; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen; Carl H van der Vaart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.