| Literature DB >> 35028516 |
Chandramani Kumar1, Rishabh Kumar Rana2, Mithilesh Kumar3, Anit Kujur3, Vivek Kashyap3, Shashi Bhushan Singh3, Vidya Sagar3, Neelanjali Kumari3, Dewesh Kumar3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the tribal state of Jharkhand, there have been very few studies on micronutrient deficiency and how it is addressed among school children. This study was conceived and undertaken to assess the effect of milk supplementation on the micronutrient status of school children.Entities:
Keywords: malnutrition; nutrient deficiencies; nutrition assessment
Year: 2021 PMID: 35028516 PMCID: PMC8718849 DOI: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Nutr Prev Health ISSN: 2516-5542
Figure 1Flow chart showing the selection of study participants for the study.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the subjects (N=318)
| Sociodemographic characteristics | Intervention, n (%) (n=159) | Control, n (%) (n=159) | |
| Gender | Male | 80 (50.3) | 78 (49.1) |
| Female | 79 (49.7) | 81 (50.9) | |
| Age (years) | Up to 10 | 12 (7.5) | 3 (1.9) |
| 11–19 | 147 (92.5) | 156 (98.1) | |
| Caste | Upper | 4 (2.5) | 10 (6.3) |
| OBC | 78 (49.1) | 49 (30.8) | |
| SC | 35 (22.0) | 29 (18.2) | |
| ST | 42 (26.4) | 71 (44.7) | |
| Religion | Hindu | 111 (69.8) | 81 (50.9) |
| Muslim | 14 (8.8) | 9 (5.7) | |
| Christian | 14 (8.8) | 1 (0.6) | |
| Others* | 20 (12.6) | 68 (42.8) | |
| Ethnicity | Non-tribal | 117 (73.6) | 87 (54.7) |
| Tribal | 42 (26.4) | 71 (44.7) | |
| Birth order | First | 41 (25.8) | 42 (26.4) |
| Second | 44 (27.7) | 44 (27.7) | |
| Third or higher | 74 (46.5) | 73 (45.9) | |
*Others include Sarna, a local religion of Jharkhand.
OBC, other backward caste; SC, scheduled caste; ST, scheduled tribe.
Bivariate regression analysis of the status of micronutrients among subjects from both groups (N=318)
| Micronutrient variables | Intervention, n (%) | Control, n (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Serum vitamin D* | Low | 158 (99.4) | 158 (99.4) | – |
| Normal | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.6) | ||
| Serum vitamin B12† | Low | 40 (25.2) | 74 (46.5) | 2.59 (1.61 to 4.16) |
| Normal | 119 (74.8) | 85 (53.5) | ||
| Serum calcium‡ | Low | 14 (8.8) | 39 (24.5) | 3.36 (1.74 to 6.49) |
| Normal | 145 (91.2) | 120 (75.5) | ||
| Anaemia§ | Anaemic | 50 (31.4) | 66 (41.5) | 1.54 (0.97 to 2.45) |
| Non-anaemic | 109 (68.6) | 93 (58.5) | ||
*Mean (±SD) vitamin D level was 16.62 (±4.73) and 16.34 (±4.99) in the intervention and control group, respectively.
†Mean (±SD) vitamin B12 level was 266.27 (±113.99) and 225.01 (±114.54) in the intervention and control group, respectively.
‡Mean (±SD) serum calcium level was 9.44 (±0.64) and 9.10 (±0.73) in the intervention and control group, respectively.
§Mean (±SD) serum haemoglobin level was 12.14 (±1.28) and 12.19 (±1.20) in the intervention and control group, respectively.
Logistic regression analysis of predictors of normal serum calcium and serum vitamin B12 status among the study subjects
| Variables | Serum calcium | Vitamin B12 | |||
| OR | 95% CI of OR | OR | 95% CI of OR | ||
| Milk consumption | No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 3.27 | 1.67 to 6.39 | 2.95 | 1.80 to 4.85 | |
| Gender | Male | 1 | 1 | ||
| Female | 0.79 | 0.42 to 1.45 | 0.99 | 0.61 to 1.60 | |
| Ethnicity | Non-tribal | 1 | 1 | ||
| Tribal | 1.21 | 0.64 to 2.27 | 0.54 | 0.32 to 0.91 | |
| Birth order | First | 1 | 1 | ||
| Second | 1.32 | 0.58 to 2.98 | 1.13 | 0.60 to 1.64 | |
| Third | 1.01 | 0.47 to 2.18 | 0.81 | 0.45 to 1.41 | |