| Literature DB >> 35027914 |
Jing Wang1,2,3, Yan Wang1,2, Zhen-Yu Wang1,2, Han Wu1,2, Cai-Yue Mei1,2, Peng-Cheng Shen1,2, Zhi-Ming Pan1,2, Xinan Jiao1,2,3.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of fosfomycin fosA7 in Salmonella enterica isolates from food animals and retail meat products in China and the impact of fosA7 on bacterial fitness. A total of 360 Salmonella isolates collected from 11 provinces and cities in China were detected for fosA7. All fosA7-positive Salmonella isolates were determined minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and sequenced by Illumina Hiseq. The fosA7 gene of S. Derby isolate HA2-WA5 was knocked out. The full length of fosA7 was cloned into vector pBR322 and then transformed into various hosts. MICs of fosfomycin, growth curves, stability, and fitness of fosA7 were evaluated. The fosA7 gene was identified in S. Derby (ST40, n = 30) and S. Reading (ST1628, n = 5). MICs to fosfomycin of 35 fosA7-positive isolates were 1 to 32 mg/L. All fosA7 were located on chromosomes of Salmonella. The deletion of fosA7 in HA2-WA5 decreased fosfomycin MIC by 16-fold and slightly affected its fitness. The acquisition of plasmid-borne fosA7 enhanced MICs of fosfomycin in Salmonella (1,024-fold) and Escherichia coli (16-fold). The recombinant plasmid pBR322-fosA7 was stable in Salmonella Typhimurium, S. Pullorum, S. Derby, and E. coli, except for Salmonella Enteritidis, and barely affected on the growth of them but significantly increased biological fitness in Salmonella. The spread of specific Salmonella serovars such as S. Derby ST40 will facilitate the dissemination of fosA7. fosA7 can confer high-level fosfomycin resistance and enhance bacterial fitness in Salmonella if transferred on plasmids; thus, it has the potential to be a reservoir of the mobilized fosfomycin resistance gene.Entities:
Keywords: ST40; Salmonella Derby; chromosome-located; fosA7; fosfomycin resistance
Year: 2021 PMID: 35027914 PMCID: PMC8751274 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.781306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Antimicrobial susceptibility results of fosA7-positive Salmonella isolates in this study.
| Strains | Serovars | Source | Year | Fosfomycin MIC (mg/L) | Resistance phenotype |
| GZ19MPS2 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 4 | TET/NAL |
| GZ19MPS3 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | TET/NAL/CIP |
| GZ19MPS17 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | AMP/CTX/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| GZ19MPS20 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | AMP/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/SXT |
| GZ19MPS26 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 1 | STR/TET/CHL/NAL/SXT |
| LN19FBS3 | Derby | Cattle | 2019 | 2 | AMP/GEN/STR/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| LN19MPS11 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | AMP/TET/CHL/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| LN19MPS18 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | AMP/GEN/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| LN19MPS22 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | AMP/GEN/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| SH19MPS13 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | AMP/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| SH19MPS19 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| SH19MPS14 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 1 | AMP/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/SXT |
| SH19MPS23 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 1 | AMP/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/SXT |
| SH19MPS28 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | AMP/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| SH19MPS29 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 2 | AMP/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/SXT |
| XJ19BS1 | Derby | Cattle | 2019 | 1 | STR/TET/NAL/SXT |
| YC19BS1 | Derby | Cattle | 2019 | 1 | AMP/GEN/STR/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| YC19BS2 | Derby | Cattle | 2019 | 1 | AMP/GEN/STR/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| YC19BS3 | Derby | Cattle | 2019 | 4 | AMP/GEN/STR/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| YC19BS4 | Derby | Cattle | 2019 | 1 | AMP/CTX/GEN/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| YC19BS5 | Derby | Cattle | 2019 | 1 | AMP/GEN/STR/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| YZ19MPS46 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 4 | AMP/TET/CHL/FFC/SXT |
| YZ19MBS1 | Derby | Beef | 2019 | 2 | AMP/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/SXT |
| WH19MPS1 | Derby | Pork | 2019 | 1 | AMP/GEN/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| HN20MPS2 | Derby | Pork | 2020 | 1 | AMP/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| SD20MPS5 | Derby | Pork | 2020 | 2 | AMP/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| HA2-WA5 | Derby | Pig slaughterhouse | 2016 | 32 | – |
| HA8-WA2 | Derby | Pig slaughterhouse | 2016 | 8 | AMP/GEN/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| HA1-FLR3 | Derby | Pig slaughterhouse | 2016 | 8 | AMP/GEN/STR/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| HA9-EX2 | Derby | Pig slaughterhouse | 2016 | 32 | AMP/GEN/TET/CHL/FFC/NAL/CIP/SXT |
| HA5-SE10 | Reading | Pig slaughterhouse | 2016 | 8 | AMP/CTX/GEN/TET/CHL/FFC |
| HA3-FL1 | Reading | Pig slaughterhouse | 2016 | 16 | AMP/CTX/GEN/TET/CHL/FFC |
| HA3-DE2 | Reading | Pig slaughterhouse | 2016 | 8 | AMP/CTX/GEN/TET/CHL/FFC |
| HA7-LA4 | Reading | Pig slaughterhouse | 2016 | 32 | TET/CHL/NAL |
| CQ2-72 | Reading | Chicken meat | 2016 | 16 | TET/CHL/NAL |
– indicates that strain was susceptible to all tested antimicrobial agents.
AMP, ampicillin; CTX, cefotaxime; GEN, gentamicin; STR, streptomycin; TET, tetracycline; CHL, chloramphenicol; FFC, florfenicol; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; SXT, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim.
FIGURE 1(A) Phylogenetic tree of fosA7-positive ST40 S. Derby compared with fosA7-negative ST71 S. Derby. Antibiotic resistance genes, mutations, and plasmid replicons are shown. (B) Phylogenetic tree of fosA7-positive S. Reading compared with S. Reading isolate CVM N42528 (GCA_001481335.1). Antibiotic resistance genes are shown. No mutations or plasmid replicons are identified.
FIGURE 2Growth curves of (A) fosA7-positive S. Derby HA2-WA5 and its fosA7 deletion mutant; (B) S. Typhimurium SL1344-pBR322 and SL1344-pBR322-fosA7; (C) S. Pullorum C79-13-pBR322 and C79-13-pBR322-fosA7; (D) S. Enteritidis P125109-pBR322 and P125109-pBR322-fosA7; (E) S. Derby 14C-S8N4-pBR322 and 14C-S8N4-pBR322-fosA7; (F) E. coli DH5α-pBR322 and DH5α-pBR322-fosA7.
FIGURE 3Effects of fosA7 on bacterial relative fitness. (A) fosA7-positive S. Derby HA2-WA5 and its fosA7 deletion mutant, ns indicates difference with no significance, * indicates difference with significance; (B) plasmid-borne fosA7 in S. Pullorum C79-13, S. Typhimurium SL1344, S. Derby 14C-S8N4, and S. Enteritidis P125109. RF was calculated as percentage of transformants or deletion mutant in all isolate.