Literature DB >> 35027723

Contrasting responses of woody and grassland ecosystems to increased CO2 as water supply varies.

Yude Pan1, Robert B Jackson2, David Y Hollinger3, Oliver L Phillips4, Robert S Nowak5, Richard J Norby6, Ram Oren7,8, Peter B Reich9,10,11, Andreas Lüscher12,13, Kevin E Mueller14, Clenton Owensby15, Richard Birdsey16, John Hom17, Yiqi Luo18.   

Abstract

Experiments show that elevated atmospheric CO2 (eCO2) often enhances plant photosynthesis and productivity, yet this effect varies substantially and may be climate sensitive. Understanding if, where and how water supply regulates CO2 enhancement is critical for projecting terrestrial responses to increasing atmospheric CO2 and climate change. Here, using data from 14 long-term ecosystem-scale CO2 experiments, we show that the eCO2 enhancement of annual aboveground net primary productivity is sensitive to annual precipitation and that this sensitivity differs between woody and grassland ecosystems. During wetter years, CO2 enhancement increases in woody ecosystems but declines in grass-dominated systems. Consistent with this difference, woody ecosystems can increase leaf area index in wetter years more effectively under eCO2 than can grassland ecosystems. Overall, and across different precipitation regimes, woody systems had markedly stronger CO2 enhancement (24%) than grasslands (13%). We developed an empirical relationship to quantify aboveground net primary productivity enhancement on the basis of changes in leaf area index, providing a new approach for evaluating eCO2 impacts on the productivity of terrestrial ecosystems.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35027723     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01642-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  25 in total

1.  Water relations in grassland and desert ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  J A Morgan; D E Pataki; C Körner; H Clark; S J Del Grosso; J M Grünzweig; A K Knapp; A R Mosier; P C D Newton; P A Niklaus; J B Nippert; R S Nowak; W J Parton; H W Polley; M R Shaw
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle.

Authors:  David Schimel; Britton B Stephens; Joshua B Fisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  CO2 alters water use, carbon gain, and yield for the dominant species in a natural grassland.

Authors:  R B Jackson; O E Sala; C B Field; H A Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Carbon cycle. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO₂ sink.

Authors:  Anders Ahlström; Michael R Raupach; Guy Schurgers; Benjamin Smith; Almut Arneth; Martin Jung; Markus Reichstein; Josep G Canadell; Pierre Friedlingstein; Atul K Jain; Etsushi Kato; Benjamin Poulter; Stephen Sitch; Benjamin D Stocker; Nicolas Viovy; Ying Ping Wang; Andy Wiltshire; Sönke Zaehle; Ning Zeng
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle.

Authors:  Benjamin Poulter; David Frank; Philippe Ciais; Ranga B Myneni; Niels Andela; Jian Bi; Gregoire Broquet; Josep G Canadell; Frederic Chevallier; Yi Y Liu; Steven W Running; Stephen Sitch; Guido R van der Werf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Partitioning direct and indirect effects reveals the response of water-limited ecosystems to elevated CO2.

Authors:  Simone Fatichi; Sebastian Leuzinger; Athanasios Paschalis; J Adam Langley; Alicia Donnellan Barraclough; Mark J Hovenden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

Authors:  Richard J Norby; Evan H Delucia; Birgit Gielen; Carlo Calfapietra; Christian P Giardina; John S King; Joanne Ledford; Heather R McCarthy; David J P Moore; Reinhart Ceulemans; Paolo De Angelis; Adrien C Finzi; David F Karnosky; Mark E Kubiske; Martin Lukac; Kurt S Pregitzer; Giuseppe E Scarascia-Mugnozza; William H Schlesinger; Ram Oren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE.

Authors:  Andrew D B Leakey; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Carl J Bernacchi; Alistair Rogers; Stephen P Long; Donald R Ort
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise.

Authors:  Trevor F Keenan; David Y Hollinger; Gil Bohrer; Danilo Dragoni; J William Munger; Hans Peter Schmid; Andrew D Richardson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake.

Authors:  Trevor F Keenan; I Colin Prentice; Josep G Canadell; Christopher A Williams; Han Wang; Michael Raupach; G James Collatz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.