| Literature DB >> 35027603 |
Zhaolong Ding1,2, Xu Liu3, Lu Gong4,5, Xin Chen1,2, Jingjing Zhao1,2, Wenjing Chen1,2.
Abstract
Human activities have increased the input of nitrogen (N) to forest ecosystems and have greatly affected litter decomposition and the soil environment. But differences in forests with different nitrogen deposition backgrounds. To better understand the response of litter decomposition and soil environment of N-limited forest to nitrogen deposition. We established an in situ experiment to simulate the effects of N deposition on soil and litter ecosystem processes in a Picea schrenkiana forest in the Tianshan Mountains, China. This study included four N treatments: control (no N addition), low N addition (LN: 5 kg N ha-1 a-1), medium N addition (MN: 10 kg N ha-1 a-1) and high N addition (HN: 20 kg N ha-1 a-1). Our results showed that N addition had a significant effect on litter decomposition and the soil environment. Litter mass loss in the LN treatment and in the MN treatment was significantly higher than that in the control treatment. In contrast, the amount of litter lost in the HN treatment was significantly lower than the other treatments. N application inhibited the degradation of lignin but promoted the breakdown of cellulose. The carbon (C), N, and phosphorus (P) contents of litter did not differ significantly among the treatments, but LN promoted the release of C and P. Our results also showed that soil pH decreased with increasing nitrogen application rates, while soil enzyme activity showed the opposite trend. In addition, the results of redundancy analysis (RDA) and correlation analyses showed that the soil environment was closely related to litter decomposition. Soil enzymes had a positive effect on litter decomposition rates, and N addition amplified these correlations. Our study confirmed that N application had effects on litter decomposition and the soil environment in a N-limited P. schrenkiana forest. LN had a strong positive effect on litter decomposition and the soil environment, while HN was significantly negative. Therefore, increased N deposition may have a negative effect on material cycling of similar forest ecosystems in the near future.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35027603 PMCID: PMC8758753 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04623-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Dynamic changes of litter dry mass remaining (%) and litter decomposition rate during litter decomposition. Data show the mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments during a given sample time are indicated by different capital letters.
Figure 2The dynamic changes of lignin and cellulose content and release rate during litter decomposition. Data show the mean ± SE (n = 3). N is N addition treatment and T is decomposition time; N × T: interaction between N addition and decomposition time. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Significant differences (P < 0.05) among sampling times are indicated by different lowercase letters and significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments are indicated by different capital letters.
Figure 3Dynamic changes of litter carbon, N, phosphorus content and release rate during litter decomposition. Data show the mean ± SE (n = 3). N is N addition treatment and T is decomposition time; N × T: interaction between N addition and decomposition time. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Significant differences (P < 0.05) among sampling times are indicated by different lowercase letters and significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments are indicated by different capital letters.
Figure 4Dynamic changes of soil carbon, N and phosphorus content, pH and enzyme activity during litter decomposition. Data show the mean ± SE (n = 3). N is N addition treatment and T is decomposition time; N × T: interaction between N addition and decomposition time. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Significant differences (P < 0.05) among sampling times are indicated by different lowercase letters and significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments are indicated by different capital letters.
Figure 5Two-dimensional graph of redundancy analysis of litter decomposition characteristics and soil variables at different N addition levels. Red hollow arrows represent soil environment and soil enzymes, and blue solid arrows represent litter decomposition characteristics. LMR is the litter mass remaining; LDR is the litter decomposition rate; LLC is the litter lignin content; LCC is the litter cellulose content; LOC is the litter organic carbon content; LTN is the litter N content; LTP is the phosphorus content of litter; SACP is the acid phosphatase activity; SSC is the sucrase activity, SUE is the urease activity; SOC is the soil organic carbon; STN is the soil total N content; STP is the soil total phosphorus content.