| Literature DB >> 28584271 |
Yong Peng1, Guangsheng Chen2, Guantao Chen1, Shun Li1, Tianchi Peng1, Xirong Qiu1, Jie Luo1, Shanshan Yang1, Tingxing Hu1, Hongling Hu1, Zhenfeng Xu1, Li Liu3, Yi Tang4, Lihua Tu5.
Abstract
In order to investigate the effects of N deposition on soil biochemistry in secondary forests, one N addition experiment was conducted in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest in the western edge of Sichuan Basin, with the highest level of background N deposition (about 95 kg N ha-1 yr-1) in China. Three N treatment levels (+0, +50, +150 kg N ha-1 yr-1) were monthly added to soil surface in this forest beginning in April 2013. Soil biochemistry and root biomass of the 0-10 cm soil horizon were measured from May 2014 to April 2015. Soil respiration was measured for two years (September 2013 to August 2015). It was showed that N additions were correlated to significantly lower soil pH, microbial biomass C (MBC) concentration, MBC/microbial biomass N (MBN) ratio, root biomass, and soil respiration rate, and significantly higher concentrations of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-). These results indicate that N additions had a significant effect on the size of soil microbial community. In addition, soil C storage may potentially increase due to the dropped soil C release under N addition.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28584271 PMCID: PMC5459847 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03044-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Physicochemical properties of soil and leaf litter in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest near Wawushan Mountain, SW China (Mean ± 1 SE, n = 36).
| Soil depth (cm) | Soil potential acidity (pH-KCl) | Soil bulk density (g cm−3) | C (g kg−1) | Total N (g kg−1) | Total P (g kg−1) | Total K (g kg−1) | C/N | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf litter | — | — | 443.0 ± 4.2 | 9.9 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 45.3 ± 1.0 | 15.5 ± 1.2 |
| 0–10 | 3.19 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 121.9 ± 6.7 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 13.4 ± 0.6 | 20.6 ± 0.6 | 12.2 ± 0.5 |
| 10–40 | 3.76 ± 0.03 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 26.6 ± 1.5 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 16.9 ± 0.5 | 16.9 ± 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.3 |
| 40–70 | 3.97 ± 0.01 | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 12.6 ± 0.7 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 18.7 ± 0.7 | 14.3 ± 0.6 | 5.1 ± 0.3 |
| 70–100 | 4.03 ± 0.01 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 7.8 ± 0.5 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 18.7 ± 0.8 | 12.4 ± 0.6 | 3.4 ± 0.2 |
Figure 1Litterfall mass and root biomass under different nitrogen treatments in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest ecosystem in southwestern China, from May 2014 to April 2015. Histograms indicate annual mean values. Plots received three levels of N addition, while control plots received none. Monthly applications of NH4NO3 began in April 2013. Values are means ± SE. Bars indicate ± 1 SE, N = 3. The results of repeated measures ANOVAs are shown for each parameter. Double asterisks (**) indicate a significant difference between the control and at least one experimental N treatment at P < 0.01. Different letters denote significant differences (one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test, P < 0.05) between treatments.
Figure 2Soil nutrient availability under different nitrogen treatments in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest ecosystem, southwestern China. Values are means ± 1 SE. Error bars indicate ± 1 SE, N = 3. The results of repeated measures ANOVAs are shown for each parameter. Asterisk (*) indicate a significant difference between the control and experimental N treatment at P < 0.05; double asterisks (**) indicate a significant difference between the control and experimental N treatment at P < 0.01.
Results of repeated measures ANOVA of soil nutrient availability, microbial properties and pH (Mean ± 1 SE, n = 3).
| Treatments | TOC (g kg−1) | TN (g kg−1) | NO3 − (mg kg−1) | NH4 + (mg kg−1) | AP (mg kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 107.1 ± 6.6a | 5.9 ± 0.4a | 31.7 ± 4.3a | 20.4 ± 4.0a | 2.0 ± 0.1a |
| LN | 119.4 ± 6.6a | 6.6 ± 0.3a | 34.5 ± 1.0a | 18.6 ± 3.6a | 2.5 ± 0.2a |
| HN | 122.0 ± 4.9a | 6.8 ± 0.3a | 44.2 ± 5.0b | 36.8 ± 7.8b | 2.4 ± 0.2a |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| CK | 142.2 ± 8.7a | 5.4 ± 1.0a | 0.2 ± 0.0a | 25.6 ± 4.0a | 3.91 ± 0.01a |
| LN | 136.2 ± 5.8a | 2.6 ± 0.1b | 0.2 ± 0.0a | 12.4 ± 1.2b | 3.78 ± 0.02b |
| HN | 153.2 ± 10.6a | 3.4 ± 0.3b | 0.2 ± 0.0a | 15.1 ± 0.8b | 3.73 ± 0.03b |
The soil samples were taken from the organic top layer (about 0–10 cm).
Different letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (Repeated measures ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test, α = 0.05).
Results of Pearson correlation analysis of soil nutrient availability, microbial properties and pH in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest ecosystem (n = 27).
| TOC | TN | NO3 − | NH4 + | AP | AK | MBC | MBN | MBC/MBN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN | 0.35 | ||||||||
| NO3 − |
| −0.16 | |||||||
| NH4 + | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.32 | ||||||
| AP |
| 0.09 | 0.27 | −0.11 | |||||
| AK | 0.23 |
| −0.10 | 0.14 | 0.16 | ||||
| MBC | −0.06 |
| 0.06 | −0.16 | 0.11 | −0.26 | |||
| MBN | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.13 | −0.05 | 0.11 | ||
| MBC/MBN | −0.19 |
| −0.01 | −0.18 | 0.03 | −0.24 |
| −0.22 | |
| pH |
| −0.01 |
| −0.33 |
| 0.11 | −0.05 | −0.24 | 0.08 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 3Soil microbial properties and pH values under different nitrogen treatments in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest ecosystem, southwestern China. Values are means ± 1 SE. Error bars indicate ± 1 SE, N = 3. The results of repeated measures ANOVAs are shown for each parameter. Asterisk (*) indicate a significant difference between the control and experimental N treatment at P < 0.05; double asterisks (**) indicate a significant difference between the control and experimental N treatment at P < 0.01.
Figure 4Soil enzyme activities under different nitrogen treatments in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest ecosystem in southwestern China. Values are means ± 1 SE. Error bars indicate ± 1 SE, N = 3. The results of repeated measures ANOVAs are shown for each parameter. Asterisk (*) indicate a significant difference between the control and experimental N treatment at P < 0.05; double asterisks (**) indicate a significant difference between the control and experimental N treatment at P < 0.01.
Results of repeated measures ANOVA of soil enzyme activities (μmol g−1 h−1, Mean ± 1 SE, n = 3).
| Treatments | Urease | Protease | NR | Invertase | AcPh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.0 ± 0.2a | 1.0 ± 0.0a | 0.7 ± 0.0a | 14.2 ± 0.8a | 3.9 ± 0.3a |
| LN | 3.0 ± 0.4a | 1.2 ± 0.1a | 0.6 ± 0.0b | 13.3 ± 0.7a | 4.0 ± 0.7a |
| HN | 2.8 ± 0.3a | 1.2 ± 0.0a | 0.7 ± 0.0a | 15.1 ± 0.2a | 4.5 ± 0.5a |
The soil samples were taken from the organic top layer (about 0–10 cm).
NR: nitrate reductase; invertase: β-Fructofuranosidase; AcPh: acid phosphatase. Different letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (Repeated measures ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test, α = 0.05).
Figure 5Annual mean soil respiration rate and cumulative CO2-C flux under different nitrogen treatments in southwestern China. Values are means ± 1 SE. Error bars indicate ± 1 SE, N = 3. Different letters denote significant differences (one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD test, P < 0.05) between treatments.
Figure 6Relationship between soil respiration rate and root biomass or soil MBC content.