Literature DB >> 35027434

Clinical Utility of Reflex Testing with Cancer Biomarkers to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening.

Lauren G Johnson1,2, Rakiya Saidu3,4, Cecilia Svanholm-Barrie5, Rosalind Boa3, Jennifer Moodley4,6, Ana Tergas2,7, David Persing8, Scott A Campbell8, Wei-Yann Tsai9, Thomas C Wright10, Lynette Denny3,4, Louise Kuhn1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is the cornerstone of cervical cancer screening, with outstanding sensitivity but only moderate specificity. We evaluated whether reflex testing for cancer biomarkers improves the sensitivity/specificity balance of screening.
METHODS: Cervical samples from women in Cape Town, South Africa, ages 30-65 years, were collected and tested with Xpert HPV and with real-time PCR to detect mRNA for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A), topoisomerase 2 alpha (TOP2A), and Ki67 (MKi67). Women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+; 85 women without and 166 with HIV) and women with no cervical disease (331 without and 257 with HIV) were included.
RESULTS: When used as reflex tests after a positive HPV result, biomarkers discriminated well between women with and without CIN2+. The inclusion of both CDKN2A and MKi67 had the best performance, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9171 and 0.8734 in women without and with HIV, respectively. Although excellent, these performance parameters did not improve on an approach utilizing only HPV testing with more stringent cycle threshold cutoffs and HPV genotype selection, which achieved AUC of 0.9059 and 0.8705 in women without and with HIV, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers can be used as triage after positive HPV results but do not outperform an approach utilizing higher viral load cutoffs on selected high-risk genotypes. IMPACT: A screening approach using HPV testing alone can be more easily implemented at the point of care. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35027434      PMCID: PMC8901524          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  28 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide.

Authors:  J M Walboomers; M V Jacobs; M M Manos; F X Bosch; J A Kummer; K V Shah; P J Snijders; J Peto; C J Meijer; N Muñoz
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 3.  Triage of high-risk HPV positive women in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Renée Mf Ebisch; Albert G Siebers; Remko P Bosgraaf; Leon Fag Massuger; Ruud Lm Bekkers; Willem Jg Melchers
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 4.  The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  F X Bosch; A Lorincz; N Muñoz; C J L M Meijer; K V Shah
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Introduction of molecular HPV testing as the primary technology in cervical cancer screening: Acting on evidence to change the current paradigm.

Authors:  Joseph E Tota; James Bentley; Jennifer Blake; François Coutlée; Máire A Duggan; Alex Ferenczy; Eduardo L Franco; Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Walter Gotlieb; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Meg McLachlin; Joan Murphy; Gina Ogilvie; Sam Ratnam
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  A cocktail of MCM2 and TOP2A, p16INK4a and Ki-67 as biomarkers for the improved diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial lesion.

Authors:  Qi-chang Yang; Yan Zhu; Hong-bing Liou; Xiao-juan Zhang; Yi Shen; Xiao-hua Ji
Journal:  Pol J Pathol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.072

7.  Reassurance against future risk of precancer and cancer conferred by a negative human papillomavirus test.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Mark Schiffman; Hormuzd A Katki; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Li C Cheung; Walter K Kinney
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Cervical cancer screening in developing countries at a crossroad: Emerging technologies and policy choices.

Authors:  Rosa Catarino; Patrick Petignat; Gabriel Dongui; Pierre Vassilakos
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

9.  Clinical evaluation of modifications to a human papillomavirus assay to optimise its utility for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Louise Kuhn; Rakiya Saidu; Rosalind Boa; Ana Tergas; Jennifer Moodley; David Persing; Scott Campbell; Wei-Yann Tsai; Thomas C Wright; Lynette Denny
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 10.  VALGENT: A protocol for clinical validation of human papillomavirus assays.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Christophe Depuydt; Ina Benoy; Johannes Bogers; Kate Cuschieri; Markus Schmitt; Michael Pawlita; Daan Geraets; Isabelle Heard; Tarik Gheit; Massimo Tommasino; Mario Poljak; Jesper Bonde; Wim Quint
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.168

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cervical Cancer Prophylaxis-State-of-the-Art and Perspectives.

Authors:  Patryk Poniewierza; Grzegorz Panek
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.