Literature DB >> 28279264

Introduction of molecular HPV testing as the primary technology in cervical cancer screening: Acting on evidence to change the current paradigm.

Joseph E Tota1, James Bentley2, Jennifer Blake3, François Coutlée4, Máire A Duggan5, Alex Ferenczy6, Eduardo L Franco7, Michael Fung-Kee-Fung8, Walter Gotlieb9, Marie-Hélène Mayrand10, Meg McLachlin11, Joan Murphy12, Gina Ogilvie13, Sam Ratnam14.   

Abstract

Since being introduced in the 1940s, cervical cytology - despite its limitations - has had unequivocal success in reducing cervical cancer burden in many countries. However, we now know that infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer and there is overwhelming evidence from large-scale clinical trials, feasibility studies and real-world experience that supports the introduction of molecular testing for HPV as the primary technology in cervical cancer screening (i.e., "HPV primary screening"). While questions remain about the most appropriate age groups for screening, screening interval and triage approach, these should not be considered barriers to implementation. Many countries are in various stages of adopting HPV primary screening, whereas others have not taken any major steps towards introduction of this approach. As a group of clinical experts and researchers in cervical cancer prevention from across Canada, we have jointly authored this comprehensive examination of the evidence to implement HPV primary screening. Our intention is to create a common understanding among policy makers, agencies, clinicians, researchers and other stakeholders about the evidence concerning HPV primary screening to catalyze the adoption of this improved approach to cervical cancer prevention. With the first cohort of vaccinated girls now turning 21, the age when routine screening typically begins, there is increased urgency to introduce HPV primary screening, whose performance may be less adversely affected compared with cervical cytology as a consequence of reduced lesion prevalence post-vaccination. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; HPV testing; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28279264     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  23 in total

1.  Cervical cancer screening: Epidemiology as the necessary but not sufficient basis of public health practice.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Human Papillomavirus DNA Methylation as a Biomarker for Cervical Precancer: Consistency across 12 Genotypes and Potential Impact on Management of HPV-Positive Women.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Ana Gradissimo; Nicolas Wentzensen; Robert D Burk; Mark Schiffman; Jessica Lam; Christopher C Sollecito; Barbara Fetterman; Thomas Lorey; Nancy Poitras; Tina R Raine-Bennett; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  HPV-based cervical cancer screening- facts, fiction, and misperceptions.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Protection against cervical cancer versus decreasing harms from screening - What would U.S. patients and clinicians prefer, and do their preferences matter?

Authors:  Walter K Kinney; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  The time is now to implement HPV testing for primary screening in low resource settings.

Authors:  Louise Kuhn; Lynette Denny
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: Empowering women to lead a paradigm change in cancer control.

Authors:  E L Franco
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  HPV self-sampling: A promising approach to reduce cervical cancer screening disparities in Canada.

Authors:  M Vahabi; A Lofters
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Strategies to reach marginalized women for cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  B Wood; A Lofters; M Vahabi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Clinical Utility of Reflex Testing with Cancer Biomarkers to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening.

Authors:  Lauren G Johnson; Rakiya Saidu; Cecilia Svanholm-Barrie; Rosalind Boa; Jennifer Moodley; Ana Tergas; David Persing; Scott A Campbell; Wei-Yann Tsai; Thomas C Wright; Lynette Denny; Louise Kuhn
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.090

10.  High-risk Human Papillomavirus Messenger RNA Testing in Wet and Dry Self-collected Specimens for High-grade Cervical Lesion Detection in Mombasa, Kenya.

Authors:  Jessica Yasmine Islam; Michael M Mutua; Emmanuel Kabare; Griffins Manguro; Michael G Hudgens; Charles Poole; Andrew F Olshan; Stephanie B Wheeler; R Scott McClelland; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.