Jake R Morgan1,2, Emily K Quinn3, Christine E Chaisson4, Elizabeth Ciemins5, Nikita Stempniewicz5, Laura F White6, Benjamin P Linas7,8, Alexander Y Walley8, Marc R LaRochelle8. 1. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 2. OptumLabs Visiting Scholar, OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, MN. 3. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 4. OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, MN. 5. American Medical Group Association, Alexandria, VA. 6. Departments of Biostatistics. 7. Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health. 8. Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association between cost-sharing and receipt of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is unknown. METHODS: We constructed a cohort of 10,513 commercially insured individuals with a new diagnosis of opioid use disorder and information on insurance cost-sharing in a large national deidentified claims database. We examined 4 cost-sharing measures: (1) pharmacy deductible; (2) medical service deductible; (3) pharmacy medication copay; and (4) medical office copay. We measured MOUD (naltrexone, buprenorphine, or methadone) initiation (within 14 d of diagnosis), engagement (second receipt within 34 d of first), and 6-month retention (continuous receipt without 14-d gap). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between cost-sharing and MOUD initiation, engagement, and retention. We calculated total out-of-pocket costs in the 30 days following MOUD initiation for each type of MOUD. RESULTS: Of 10,513 individuals with incident opioid use disorder, 1202 (11%) initiated MOUD, 742 (7%) engaged, and 253 (2%) were retained in MOUD at 6 months. A high ($1000+) medical deductible was associated with a lower odds of initiation compared with no deductible (odds ratio: 0.85, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.98). We found no significant associations between other cost-sharing measures for initiation, engagement, or retention. Median initial 30-day out-of-pocket costs ranged from $100 for methadone to $710 for extended-release naltrexone. CONCLUSIONS: Among insurance plan cost-sharing measures, only medical services deductible showed an association with decreased MOUD initiation. Policy and benefit design should consider ways to reduce cost barriers to initiation and retention in MOUD.
BACKGROUND: The association between cost-sharing and receipt of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is unknown. METHODS: We constructed a cohort of 10,513 commercially insured individuals with a new diagnosis of opioid use disorder and information on insurance cost-sharing in a large national deidentified claims database. We examined 4 cost-sharing measures: (1) pharmacy deductible; (2) medical service deductible; (3) pharmacy medication copay; and (4) medical office copay. We measured MOUD (naltrexone, buprenorphine, or methadone) initiation (within 14 d of diagnosis), engagement (second receipt within 34 d of first), and 6-month retention (continuous receipt without 14-d gap). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between cost-sharing and MOUD initiation, engagement, and retention. We calculated total out-of-pocket costs in the 30 days following MOUD initiation for each type of MOUD. RESULTS: Of 10,513 individuals with incident opioid use disorder, 1202 (11%) initiated MOUD, 742 (7%) engaged, and 253 (2%) were retained in MOUD at 6 months. A high ($1000+) medical deductible was associated with a lower odds of initiation compared with no deductible (odds ratio: 0.85, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.98). We found no significant associations between other cost-sharing measures for initiation, engagement, or retention. Median initial 30-day out-of-pocket costs ranged from $100 for methadone to $710 for extended-release naltrexone. CONCLUSIONS: Among insurance plan cost-sharing measures, only medical services deductible showed an association with decreased MOUD initiation. Policy and benefit design should consider ways to reduce cost barriers to initiation and retention in MOUD.
Authors: Emlyn S Jones; Brent A Moore; Jody L Sindelar; Patrick G O'Connor; Richard S Schottenfeld; David A Fiellin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sarah E Wakeman; Marc R Larochelle; Omid Ameli; Christine E Chaisson; Jeffrey Thomas McPheeters; William H Crown; Francisca Azocar; Darshak M Sanghavi Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-02-05
Authors: Susan H Busch; David A Fiellin; Marek C Chawarski; Patricia H Owens; Michael V Pantalon; Kathryn Hawk; Steven L Bernstein; Patrick G O'Connor; Gail D'Onofrio Journal: Addiction Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Marc R Larochelle; Dana Bernson; Thomas Land; Thomas J Stopka; Na Wang; Ziming Xuan; Sarah M Bagley; Jane M Liebschutz; Alexander Y Walley Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Paul J Joudrey; Nicholas Chadi; Payel Roy; Kenneth L Morford; Paxton Bach; Simeon Kimmel; Emily A Wang; Susan L Calcaterra Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jake R Morgan; Alexander Y Walley; Sean M Murphy; Avik Chatterjee; Scott E Hadland; Joshua Barocas; Benjamin P Linas; Sabrina A Assoumou Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Joshua A Barocas; Laura F White; Jianing Wang; Alexander Y Walley; Marc R LaRochelle; Dana Bernson; Thomas Land; Jake R Morgan; Jeffrey H Samet; Benjamin P Linas Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 11.561
Authors: Madeline C Frost; Julie E Richards; John R Blosnich; Eric J Hawkins; Judith I Tsui; E Jennifer Edelman; Emily C Williams Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 4.852