Jennifer L McNeer1, Kjeld Schmiegelow2. 1. Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplant, University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 4060, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. jmcneer@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the success stories of pediatric oncology, but challenges and questions remain, including the optimal approach to the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) leukemia. It is unclear why some children with ALL develop CNS leukemia and others do not, and there remains debate regarding optimal regimens for prophylaxis, upfront treatment, and the treatment of CNS relapses. These topics are especially important since both cranial radiation therapy (CRT) and intensive intrathecal therapy carry risks of both short- and long-term adverse effects. In this review, we aim to identify areas of ongoing debate on this topic, review the biology of CNS leukemia, and summarize clinical trial data that address some of these questions. RECENT FINDINGS: Both retrospective and meta-analyses have demonstrated that few patients with ALL benefit from CRT as a component of CNS-directed treatment for de novo disease, allowing cooperative groups to greatly limit the number of patients undergoing CRT as part of their initial ALL regimens. More recent efforts are focusing on how best to assay for low levels of CNS disease at the time of diagnosis, as well as the biological drivers that may result in CNS leukemia in certain patients. Progress remains to be made in the identification and treatment of CNS leukemia in pediatric ALL. Advancements have occurred to limit the number of children undergoing CRT, but much has yet to be learned to better understand the biology of and risk factors for CNS leukemia, and novel approaches are required to approach CNS relapse of ALL.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the success stories of pediatric oncology, but challenges and questions remain, including the optimal approach to the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) leukemia. It is unclear why some children with ALL develop CNS leukemia and others do not, and there remains debate regarding optimal regimens for prophylaxis, upfront treatment, and the treatment of CNS relapses. These topics are especially important since both cranial radiation therapy (CRT) and intensive intrathecal therapy carry risks of both short- and long-term adverse effects. In this review, we aim to identify areas of ongoing debate on this topic, review the biology of CNS leukemia, and summarize clinical trial data that address some of these questions. RECENT FINDINGS: Both retrospective and meta-analyses have demonstrated that few patients with ALL benefit from CRT as a component of CNS-directed treatment for de novo disease, allowing cooperative groups to greatly limit the number of patients undergoing CRT as part of their initial ALL regimens. More recent efforts are focusing on how best to assay for low levels of CNS disease at the time of diagnosis, as well as the biological drivers that may result in CNS leukemia in certain patients. Progress remains to be made in the identification and treatment of CNS leukemia in pediatric ALL. Advancements have occurred to limit the number of children undergoing CRT, but much has yet to be learned to better understand the biology of and risk factors for CNS leukemia, and novel approaches are required to approach CNS relapse of ALL.
Authors: Ajay Vora; Anita Andreano; Ching-Hon Pui; Stephen P Hunger; Martin Schrappe; Anja Moericke; Andrea Biondi; Gabriele Escherich; Lewis B Silverman; Nicholas Goulden; Mervi Taskinen; Rob Pieters; Keizo Horibe; Meenakshi Devidas; Franco Locatelli; Maria Grazia Valsecchi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yin Ting Cheung; Raja B Khan; Wei Liu; Tara M Brinkman; Michelle N Edelmann; Wilburn E Reddick; Deqing Pei; Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari; Deokumar Srivastava; Cheng Cheng; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Ching-Hon Pui; Kevin R Krull Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Kevin R Krull; Chenghong Li; Nicholas S Phillips; Yin Ting Cheung; Tara M Brinkman; Carmen L Wilson; Gregory T Armstrong; Raja B Khan; Thomas E Merchant; Noah D Sabin; DeoKumar Srivastava; Ching-Hon Pui; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Charles A Sklar; Wassim Chemaitilly Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robert E Goldsby; Qi Liu; Paul C Nathan; Daniel C Bowers; Amanda Yeaton-Massey; Shannon H Raber; Daniel Hill; Gregory T Armstrong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie Zeltzer; Leslie L Robison; Roger J Packer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Donald A Berry; Shouhao Zhou; Howard Higley; Lata Mukundan; Shuangshuang Fu; Gregory H Reaman; Brent L Wood; Gary J Kelloff; J Milburn Jessup; Jerald P Radich Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Nicholas S Phillips; Carrie R Howell; Jennifer Q Lanctot; Robyn E Partin; Ching-Hon Pui; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull; Kirsten K Ness Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 6.921