Donald A Berry1, Shouhao Zhou1, Howard Higley2, Lata Mukundan2, Shuangshuang Fu3, Gregory H Reaman4, Brent L Wood5, Gary J Kelloff6, J Milburn Jessup7, Jerald P Radich8. 1. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 2. CCS Associates, Inc. 3. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston. 4. US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland. 5. University of Washington School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 6. US National Cancer Institute, Bethsaida, Maryland. 7. Inova Fairfax Hospital. 8. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to the presence of disease in cases deemed to be in complete remission by conventional pathologic analysis. Assessing the association of MRD status following induction therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with relapse and mortality may improve the efficiency of clinical trials and accelerate drug development. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relationships between event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) with MRD status in pediatric and adult ALL using publications of clinical trials and other databases. DATA SOURCES: Clinical studies in ALL identified via searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, and clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION: Our search and study screening process adhered to the PRISMA Guidelines. Studies that addressed EFS or OS by MRD status in patients with ALL were included; reviews, abstracts, and studies with fewer than 30 patients or insufficient MRD description were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study sample size, patient age, follow-up time, timing of MRD assessment (postinduction or consolidation), MRD detection method, phenotype/genotype (B cell, T cell, Philadelphia chromosome), and EFS and OS. Searches of PubMed and MEDLINE identified 566 articles. A parallel search on clinicaltrials.gov found 67 closed trials and 62 open trials as of 2014. Merging results of 2 independent searches and applying exclusions gave 39 publications in 3 arms of patient populations (adult, pediatric, and mixed). We performed separate meta-analyses for each of these 3 subpopulations. RESULTS: The 39 publications comprised 13 637 patients: 16 adult studies (2076 patients), 20 pediatric (11 249 patients), and 3 mixed (312 patients). The EFS hazard ratio (HR) for achieving MRD negativity is 0.23 (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI] 0.18-0.28) for pediatric patients and 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.24-0.33) for adults. The respective HRs in OS are 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.19-0.41) and 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.20-0.39). The effect was similar across all subgroups and covariates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The value of having achieved MRD negativity is substantial in both pediatric and adult patients with ALL. These results are consistent across therapies, methods of and times of MRD assessment, cutoff levels, and disease subtypes. Minimal residual disease status warrants consideration as an early measure of disease response for evaluating new therapies, improving the efficiency of clinical trials, accelerating drug development, and for regulatory approval. A caveat is that an accelerated approval of a particular new drug using an intermediate end point, such as MRD, would require confirmation using traditional efficacy end points.
IMPORTANCE: Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to the presence of disease in cases deemed to be in complete remission by conventional pathologic analysis. Assessing the association of MRD status following induction therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with relapse and mortality may improve the efficiency of clinical trials and accelerate drug development. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relationships between event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) with MRD status in pediatric and adult ALL using publications of clinical trials and other databases. DATA SOURCES: Clinical studies in ALL identified via searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, and clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION: Our search and study screening process adhered to the PRISMA Guidelines. Studies that addressed EFS or OS by MRD status in patients with ALL were included; reviews, abstracts, and studies with fewer than 30 patients or insufficient MRD description were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study sample size, patient age, follow-up time, timing of MRD assessment (postinduction or consolidation), MRD detection method, phenotype/genotype (B cell, T cell, Philadelphia chromosome), and EFS and OS. Searches of PubMed and MEDLINE identified 566 articles. A parallel search on clinicaltrials.gov found 67 closed trials and 62 open trials as of 2014. Merging results of 2 independent searches and applying exclusions gave 39 publications in 3 arms of patient populations (adult, pediatric, and mixed). We performed separate meta-analyses for each of these 3 subpopulations. RESULTS: The 39 publications comprised 13 637 patients: 16 adult studies (2076 patients), 20 pediatric (11 249 patients), and 3 mixed (312 patients). The EFS hazard ratio (HR) for achieving MRD negativity is 0.23 (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI] 0.18-0.28) for pediatric patients and 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.24-0.33) for adults. The respective HRs in OS are 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.19-0.41) and 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.20-0.39). The effect was similar across all subgroups and covariates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The value of having achieved MRD negativity is substantial in both pediatric and adult patients with ALL. These results are consistent across therapies, methods of and times of MRD assessment, cutoff levels, and disease subtypes. Minimal residual disease status warrants consideration as an early measure of disease response for evaluating new therapies, improving the efficiency of clinical trials, accelerating drug development, and for regulatory approval. A caveat is that an accelerated approval of a particular new drug using an intermediate end point, such as MRD, would require confirmation using traditional efficacy end points.
Authors: Jianbiao Zhou; Meredith A Goldwasser; Aihong Li; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Donna Neuberg; Hongjun Wang; Virginia Dalton; Kathryn D McBride; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman; John G Gribben Journal: Blood Date: 2007-05-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Huining Kang; I-Ming Chen; Carla S Wilson; Edward J Bedrick; Richard C Harvey; Susan R Atlas; Meenakshi Devidas; Charles G Mullighan; Xuefei Wang; Maurice Murphy; Kerem Ar; Walker Wharton; Michael J Borowitz; W Paul Bowman; Deepa Bhojwani; William L Carroll; Bruce M Camitta; Gregory H Reaman; Malcolm A Smith; James R Downing; Stephen P Hunger; Cheryl L Willman Journal: Blood Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Max S Topp; Peter Kufer; Nicola Gökbuget; Mariele Goebeler; Matthias Klinger; Svenja Neumann; Heinz-A Horst; Thorsten Raff; Andreas Viardot; Mathias Schmid; Matthias Stelljes; Markus Schaich; Evelyn Degenhard; Rudolf Köhne-Volland; Monika Brüggemann; Oliver Ottmann; Heike Pfeifer; Thomas Burmeister; Dirk Nagorsen; Margit Schmidt; Ralf Lutterbuese; Carsten Reinhardt; Patrick A Baeuerle; Michael Kneba; Hermann Einsele; Gert Riethmüller; Dieter Hoelzer; Gerhard Zugmaier; Ralf C Bargou Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael J Borowitz; Meenakshi Devidas; Stephen P Hunger; W Paul Bowman; Andrew J Carroll; William L Carroll; Stephen Linda; Paul L Martin; D Jeanette Pullen; David Viswanatha; Cheryl L Willman; Naomi Winick; Bruce M Camitta Journal: Blood Date: 2008-04-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Orietta Spinelli; Barbara Peruta; Manuela Tosi; Vittoria Guerini; Anna Salvi; Maria Cristina Zanotti; Elena Oldani; Anna Grassi; Tamara Intermesoli; Caterina Micò; Giuseppe Rossi; Pietro Fabris; Giorgio Lambertenghi-Deliliers; Emanuele Angelucci; Tiziano Barbui; Renato Bassan; Alessandro Rambaldi Journal: Haematologica Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Mauro Krampera; Antonella Vitale; Carlo Vincenzi; Omar Perbellini; Anna Guarini; Luciana Annino; Giuseppe Todeschini; Andrea Camera; Francesco Fabbiano; Giuseppe Fioritoni; Francesco Nobile; Richard Szydlo; Franco Mandelli; Robin Foà; Giovanni Pizzolo Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Derek L Stirewalt; Katherine A Guthrie; Lan Beppu; Eileen M Bryant; Kris Doney; Ted Gooley; Frederick R Appelbaum; Jerald P Radich Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Giuseppe Saglio; Dong-Wook Kim; Surapol Issaragrisil; Philipp le Coutre; Gabriel Etienne; Clarisse Lobo; Ricardo Pasquini; Richard E Clark; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy P Hughes; Neil Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Mei Dong; Ariful Haque; Richard A Larson; Hagop M Kantarjian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carol Fries; Diana G Adlowitz; Janice M Spence; John P Spence; Philip J Rock; W Richard Burack Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-04-11 Impact factor: 3.167