| Literature DB >> 35024201 |
Angela Corvino1, Valentina Citi2, Ferdinando Fiorino1, Francesco Frecentese1, Elisa Magli1, Elisa Perissutti1, Vincenzo Santagada1, Vincenzo Calderone2, Alma Martelli2, Era Gorica2, Simone Brogi2, Flavia Faganello Colombo3, Caroline Nunes Capello3, Heloisa Helena Araujo Ferreira4, Maria Grazia Rimoli1, Federica Sodano5, Barbara Rolando5, Francesca Pavese6, Antonio Petti6, Marcelo Nicolás Muscará4, Giuseppe Caliendo1, Beatrice Severino1.
Abstract
Introduction: Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a fundamental biological endogenous gas-mediator in the respiratory system. It regulates pivotal patho-physiological processes such as oxidative stress, pulmonary circulation, airway tone and inflammation.Entities:
Keywords: Asthma; H2S releasing compounds; Hybrids; Hydrogen sulfide; Lung diseases; Steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35024201 PMCID: PMC8721254 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.05.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
The table reports the structure of the designed compounds and their enzymatic and chemical stability at 37 °C. Chemical stability in SGF and PBS as percentage of remaining compound after 24 h of incubation. Stability in human serum as half-life (min). Results are reported as mean values ± SD (n = 3).
| # | Structure | % remaining compd at 24 h | Half-life (min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGF | PBS | Human Serum | ||
| 99 ± 1 | 99 ± 2 | 12 ± 1 | ||
| 99 ± 1 | 99 ± 2 | 10 ± 1 | ||
| 99 ± 1 | 97 ± 1 | 15 ± 2 | ||
| 99 ± 1 | 99 ± 2 | 9 ± 2 | ||
Scheme 1(i) succinic anhydride/DMAP/anhydrous pyridine; (ii) EDC/DMAP.
H2S-generating characteristics of the tested molecules. The table shows the values of Cmax of H2S-release obtained with TBZ, ADT-OH, and the hybrid compounds at the concentration of 100 µM by the electrochemical analysis under different experimental conditions. Data are reported as means ± SEM.
| H2S-release (µM) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Compound (100 µM) | + L-cysteine 4 mM | − L-cysteine |
| 1.6 ± 0.3 | n.d. | |
| 1.7 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | |
| 0.7 ± 0.1 | n.d. | |
| 1.8 ± 0.5 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | |
| 5.1 ± 1.5 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | |
| 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |
Calculated physico-chemical properties for compounds 5 and 7 using QikProp software.
| Cpd | SASA | QPlogP | QPlogS | QPPCaco | QPPMDCK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 969 | 3.42 | −5.34 | 233 | 221 | |
| 911 | 2.99 | −4.62 | 246 | 237 |
SASA predicted the total solvent accessible surface (range or recommended value for 95% of known drugs 300–1000).
QPlogP predicted octanol/water partition coefficient (range or recommended value for 95% of known drugs −2–6.5).
QPlogS predicted aqueous solubility in mol/dm3(range or recommended value for 95% of known drugs −6.5–0.5).
QPPCaco predicted apparent Caco-2 cell permeability in nm/sec (range or recommended value for 95% of known drugs >500 great, <25 poor).
QPPMDCK predicted apparent MDCK cell permeability in nm/sec (range or recommended value for 95% of known drugs >500 great, <25 poor).
Fig. 1Intracellular hydrogen sulfide release. Graphs in panel A show the H2S-kinetic release of each compound. Panel B shows the cumulative H2S release calculated as AUC of the Fluorescence index measured for 40 min. Data are reported as mean ± SEM, comparing the data to diallyl disulfide H2S release. One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni has been used as statistical analysis (n = 6). (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001).
Fig. 2Panel A. Evaluation of hexosaminidase release as marker of RBL-2H3 degranulation. Data are compared to the degranulation induced by DNP – HAS. One-way ANOVA plus Bonferroni has been used as statistical analysis. * indicates significant differences vs DNP-HSA as 100% (** = P < 0.01; *** = P < 0.001); # indicates significant differences of Prednisone (cmp 2) 100 µM vs compound 7 100 µM (# = P < 0.05); § indicates significant differences of Prednisone (cmp 2) 300 µM vs compound 7 300 µM (§§§ = P < 0.001). Panel B. Hyperpolarizing effect of the tested molecules on BSMCs membrane. The graph shows the concentration-dependent hyperpolarizing effect of the tested compounds on cell membrane of BSMCs; effects are compared to the reference compound NS1619. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni has been used as statistical analysis (n = 6). * indicates the statistical difference vs NS1619 (*** P < 0.001); § indicates the statistical difference vs Prednisone (cmp 2) 100 µM (§§§ P < 0.001); # indicates the statistical difference vs Prednisone (cmp 2) 300 µM (### P < 0.001).
Fig. 4Panels A, B, C, D represent the pulmonary morphometry showing the peribronchiolar collagen (in blue), as revealed by Masson's Trichrome staining. Panels E, F, G, H are representative images of the immunohistochemical reaction for smooth muscle α-actin (in brown). All the histological lung sections were analysed by optical microscopy (magnification: 200X; scale bar shown in the Saline group images: 100 μm).
Fig. 5Panels A, B, C, D are representative images of the histological analysis of eosinophil infiltration around the bronchioles. The histological lung sections were stained with Sirius Red, under which conditions eosinophils present with red-coloured cytoplasm. Panels E, F, G, H are representative images of the histological analysis of mast cell infiltration into the lungs. The histological lung sections were stained with toluidine blue, under which conditions degranulated mast cells present with blue-coloured nucleus and green-coloured granules spread over the adjacent tissue. All the histological lung sections were analysed by optical microscopy (magnification was set at 400X for panels A-D and 200X for panels E-H).
Fig. 3Effect of treatment with either prednisone (Pred) or its H2S-releasing derivative (compound 7), at equimolar doses equivalent to 5.5 mg/kg prednisone, on OVA-induced allergic lung inflammation and remodeling in mice. Panel A: peribronchiolar collagen expression; panel B: smooth muscle α-actin expression.; panel C: peribronchiolar eosinophils; panel D: peribronchiolar mast cells. Differences among the group means were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test for multiple comparisons (n = 5 animals/group). ***P < 0.001 vs. Control; ###P < 0.001 vs. vehicle-treated allergic mice (OVA); δδP < 0.01 vs Pred.