Panagis Galiatsatos1,2, Princess Ekpo2, Raiza Schreiber1,2, Lindsay Barker3, Pali Shah1,3. 1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Tobacco Treatment Clinic, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Office of Transplantation, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smoking behavior includes mechanisms taken on by persons to adjust for certain characteristic changes of cigarettes. However, as lung function declines due to lung-specific diseases, it is unclear how mechanical smoking behavior changes affect persons who smoke. We review two cases of patients who stopped smoking prior to and then subsequently resumed smoking after lung transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective review of two patients who were recipients of lung transplantation and sustained from cigarette usage prior to transplantation. RESULTS: Patient A was a 54-year-old woman who received a double lung transplant secondary to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in October 2017. She had stopped smoking cigarettes in July 2015 (FEV1 .56 L). Patient B was a 40-year-old man who received a double lung transplantation due to sarcoidosis in January 2015. He stopped smoking cigarettes in February 2012 (FEV1 1.15 L). Post-transplant, Patient A resumed smoking on March 2018 where her FEV1 was at 2.12 L (5 months post-transplantation), and Patient B resumed smoking in April 2017 where his FEV1 was 2.37 L (26 months post-transplantation). CONCLUSION: We report on two patients who resumed smoking after lung transplantation. While variations of smoking mechanics have been identified as a function of nicotine yield and type of cigarette, it lung mechanics may play a role in active smoking as well. Therefore, proper screening for tobacco usage post-lung transplantation should be considered a priority in order to preserve transplanted lungs.
BACKGROUND: Smoking behavior includes mechanisms taken on by persons to adjust for certain characteristic changes of cigarettes. However, as lung function declines due to lung-specific diseases, it is unclear how mechanical smoking behavior changes affect persons who smoke. We review two cases of patients who stopped smoking prior to and then subsequently resumed smoking after lung transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective review of two patients who were recipients of lung transplantation and sustained from cigarette usage prior to transplantation. RESULTS: Patient A was a 54-year-old woman who received a double lung transplant secondary to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in October 2017. She had stopped smoking cigarettes in July 2015 (FEV1 .56 L). Patient B was a 40-year-old man who received a double lung transplantation due to sarcoidosis in January 2015. He stopped smoking cigarettes in February 2012 (FEV1 1.15 L). Post-transplant, Patient A resumed smoking on March 2018 where her FEV1 was at 2.12 L (5 months post-transplantation), and Patient B resumed smoking in April 2017 where his FEV1 was 2.37 L (26 months post-transplantation). CONCLUSION: We report on two patients who resumed smoking after lung transplantation. While variations of smoking mechanics have been identified as a function of nicotine yield and type of cigarette, it lung mechanics may play a role in active smoking as well. Therefore, proper screening for tobacco usage post-lung transplantation should be considered a priority in order to preserve transplanted lungs.
Smoking behavior is distinct, highly complex, and dynamic.
Smoking topography attempts to characterize an individual’s smoking behavior
holistically, addressing cigarette properties, smoking mechanics, and triggers.[2-4] Topography parameters have been utilized to exhibit the compensatory
smoking behavior resulting from cigarette brand-switching. Participants regulated their
nicotine intake by smoking more of the low-yield cigarettes in comparison to the high-yield
cigarettes.[5-7] It remains unclear, though, what part of
smoking topography is a significant driver in consumption rate and/or abstinence for certain
populations of active smokers.Smoking mechanics is a part of smoking topography involving parameters for puffing,
inhalation, and exhalation.[3,4] The
inhalation and exhalation parameters of smoking mechanics depend, in part, on the condition
of airways and lung tissue. Airway strength can be measured with forced expiratory volume
(FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). While smoking has been shown to reduce variables
such as FEV1,[8,9] it is unclear if such
changes impact smoking continuation and/or cessation or overall smoking topography. It is
possible that patients with diminished lung function may smoke less of a cigarette due to
mechanical limitations, suggesting an interplay between smoking mechanics and lung
health.Lung transplantation is currently a treatment option for those with end-stage lung diseases.
For lung transplant candidates, active smoking is a contraindication to transplant,
and many centers recommend a period of abstinence from smoking prior to
waitlisting.[11,12] Around 40% are active
smokers before approaching lung transplantation candidacy.
Unfortunately, smoking cessation therapy compliance of transplant recipients is low,
with 10–40% relapsing post-lung transplantation.[13,14] The role of smoking mechanics in
successful smoking cessation and smoking relapse in post-lung transplant patients has yet to
be determined.In this study, we present the cases of two patients with tobacco dependence who received
lung transplants after maintaining smoking abstinence, though relapsed to tobacco usage
after transplantation. We discuss in detail how changes in their lung function affected
their smoking mechanics and may have impacted their relapse to smoking.
Methods
For both patients, we collected several variables to better understand their smoking
phenotype. This included brand of cigarette, smoking topography (variables of smoking
mechanics such as puff duration, inhalation duration, and puffs per cigarette),
and triggers to smoking. Further, we identified the age that they began to smoke
consistently (defined as daily use of cigarettes) as well prior quit attempt strategies and
duration of abstinence from smoking. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board at
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (IRB00282725) and all actions undertaken by the authors
were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, along with written consent for both
patients.Screening for smoking cessation at our institution takes on both self-report and laboratory
data. Specifically, we screen for urine nicotine and cotinine. If the patient is using
nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) to assist in smoking cessation, then we screen for
anabasine to assure the nicotine and cotinine are from an NRT source and not tobacco products.
Pre-transplantation, the aforementioned laboratory data is monitored until the
patient achieves a status of 6-months smoke-free. For patients who are post-lung transplant,
since there are no active international guidelines suggesting how to monitor for smoking relapse,
at our institution we continue to assess smoking status with self-reports and with
the aforementioned smoking-related biomarkers. These biomarkers are ordered at the
discretion of the transplant team in conjunction with clinical assessments of the
patient.We collected data on their pulmonary-specific morbidity, as well as any other morbidity
that would influence the patient’s tobacco dependence (e.g., major depressive disorder and
general anxiety disorder). In regards to the patient’s pulmonary-specific morbidity, we
documented management strategies prior to pre-transplantation, pulmonary function testing,
and management of tobacco dependence. Post-transplantation, we collected data on ongoing
management of the patient’s tobacco dependence and pulmonary function testing. Finally, we
selected patients who relapsed into smoking post-lung transplant and, after confirmation of
their smoking resumption, were enrolled into the Tobacco Treatment Clinic at the Johns
Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Results
Patient A
Patient A is a 54-year-old woman status post a double lung transplant secondary to
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The date of transplant was October 2017. Her
COPD was considered a GOLD Class D given her exacerbation history, and was managed with an
inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist, inhaled corticosteroid, inhaled long-acting
beta2 agonists, as well as chronic macrolide (azithromycin), and an as needed short-acting
beta2 agonist inhalers and nebulizers. She also underwent pulmonary rehabilitation for her
COPD management as well. Given the inability to improve her symptoms as well as her
overall prognosis, the patient began to pursue candidacy for lung transplantation.Patient A quit smoking in 2015, with an FEV1 at the time of .56 L (21% predicted). She
used varenicline to help with her smoking cessation strategy in 2015. She discussed that
she has been smoking since the age of 15, and smoked consistently a pack of cigarettes a
day, if not more, up until her early 40s. When she was diagnosed with COPD in 2004, she
found herself frequenting hospitalizations and outpatient clinics due to exacerbations,
often making it difficult to smoke given her “breathlessness.” She discussed her smoking
mechanics as long puffs, deep inhalations, as well as taking more than 5 puffs per
cigarette (Table 1). Her
choice of cigarette usage is Marlboro Reds, smoking a pack or more a day. She identified
triggers to smoking as stress and anxiety, specific places (e.g., bathrooms of her home
and her car), and after food. She never attempted to quit in the past, but did have
periods without smoking, often due to COPD-related health issues. For the purpose of
obtain a lung transplant, she was started on varenicline, using the medication for 6-weeks
in total, stopping in July 2015 and receiving a transplant in 2017.
Table 1.
Patient characteristics and smoking topography.
Patient A
Patient B
FEV1* (time of smoking cessation)
.56 L (21%)
1.15 L (35%)
Smoking history
Age of smoking onset
14 years old
12 years old
Cigarette preference
Marlboro reds
Newport slims
Packs per year
80
30
Smoking topography
Puff duration
Long
Long
Inhalation hold
Long
Long
Puffs per cigarette
>5
>5
Cigarettes per day
10–15
15–20
Quit strategy
Varenicline
Avoidance
FEV1 (time of smoking relapse)
2.12 (70%)
2.37 (72%)
Relapse time
5-months
26-months
Post-transplant
FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume, 1-second.
Patient characteristics and smoking topography.FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume, 1-second.Patient A discussed a lapse in smoking at 5-months post-transplantation after
identification of a positive urine nicotine and cotinine level, sent at the discretion of
the transplant team given a decline of lung function on pulmonary function testing. The
patient highlighted that stress at that time influenced significantly the need to
re-engage with smoking. The ability to smoke in the manner she was accustomed to (long
puffs, long inhalation) reaffirmed as well a “satisfaction” gain from smoking. At the time
of relapse, her FEV1 had increased to 2.12 L, an over 200% increase in FEV1 from the
patient’s prior baseline when she began to abstain from cigarettes.
Patient B
Patient B is a 40-year-old man status post a double lung transplant secondary to
sarcoidosis. The date of transplant was January 2015. The impact of sarcoidosis on the
patient’s lungs was severe, with pre-transplant imaging identifying extensive central
bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease present with predominance near hila and upper
lobes. Further, there was a cavitary lesion in the right upper lobe as well. Patient B was
managed mainly with prednisone and short-acting beta agonist inhalers, though he had
frequent hospitalizations for his sarcoidosis and resulting pulmonary symptoms of dyspnea.
As his disease progressed, he discussed his ability to breathe was a challenge, even at
rest, coupled with excessive sputum production. Both of these symptoms impaired his
ability to smoke, ultimately resulting in his abstinence transition.Patient B began to smoke at the age of 12. His preferred cigarette choice was Newport
Slims, smoking up to a pack of cigarettes a day. He described his smoking mechanics as
long puffs with a long inhalation, and would smoke the cigarette completely (Table 1). He identified his
triggers to smoke as stress and anxiety, after eating, and certain areas (e.g., in his
car). He eventually stopped smoking, identifying while he wanted a lung transplant, he
found it difficult to smoke in the manner he preferred. His abstinence was through
avoidance and without pharmacological assistance. His last cigarette was in February 2012,
with an FEV1 1.15 L at the time.Patient B resumed smoking in April 2017, and discussed this at a lung transplant office
visit. While it was self-reported, it was confirmed with urine nicotine and cotinine
levels being positive. He identified stress as the main variable resulting in his lapse to
smoking. With his improved lung function, he was able to resume smoking with the lung
mechanics that were consistent with his prior usage of cigarettes. He lapsed at 26-months
post-lung transplantation. His FEV1 at the time of resuming smoking cigarettes was 2.37 L,
more than double of FEV1 at the time of abstinence from smoking.
Discussion
We highlight two patients status post-lung transplantation who relapsed to smoking, with
both patients identifying the ability to smoke with improved lung function mechanics
contributing to resuming smoking of cigarettes. Other similarities these patients shared was
initiation of smoking at a young age (under the age of 18) and variables that result in
cravings for cigarettes, specifically that of anxiety and stress. Such findings warrant
further discussion in reaffirming tobacco dependence as a chronic disease whose management
should continue in recipients of lung transplant.The dynamics of smoking mechanics is associated with many unique variables, for both the
individual smoking and in regards to the cigarette itself. For instance, the nicotine yield
of a cigarette may dictate the puff duration, puff volume per cigarette, and number of puffs
per cigarette.
Further, the nicotine itself from cigarette smoke may provide a positive consequence
for a person actively smoking.
For instance, in anxiety disorders may increase smoking behavior and the risk for
nicotine dependence, as cigarettes may be seen as an anxiolytic self-treatment.[18,19] Both patients’ description of their
smoking mechanics, specifically their puff duration and inhalation hold (puff volume),
appeared to be impacted by specific external influences (stress and anxiety). When faced
with these triggers to smoke in the past, during low FEV1 variables, their inability to
smoke in the manner they desired resulted in the ability to pursue abstinence. However,
while faced with the same triggers post-transplant, the ability to match their desired
smoking mechanics due to the improved FEV1 to the trigger that is driving their craving for
nicotine (anxiety and stress) resulted in a lapse to cigarette consumption.A significant insight into the lapse of smoking by both patients’ status post post-lung
transplantation is in how it reaffirms tobacco dependence and nicotine addiction as a
chronic disease. For instance, proteins impacting tolerance and craving in nicotine
addiction, specifically cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and delta fos b, remain
elevated after an individual’s last cigarette for a significant amount of time (if not
permanent).[20,21] Both proteins play a
significant role in nicotine’s ability to impact the brain’s reward system as well as the
conditioning that occurs in regards to person’s compulsion towards smoking.
Further, if nicotine exposure occurs at a young age, at a time when the prefrontal
cortex continues to evolve, epigenetic changes may sensitize the brain to nicotine craving
and future and continued use of cigarettes. This is the case for both patients, who began
smoking while they were adolescents. Therefore, insight into both active smoking topography
as well as past usage of cigarettes (e.g., age of initiation of smoking) may result in an
understanding of a smoking phenotype that warrants management both before and after lung
transplantation.Smoking resumption post solid organ transplant is not an uncommon diagnosis in transplant
centers. In regards to post-lung transplantation, smoking resumption has been reported from
0 to 10% in the United States to up to 15% at a European transplant center.[23,24] Smoking cessation and smoking relapse are
both complex, with multiple factors contributing to cessation and relapse. Improved lung
function is an exceptional outcome for patients after lung transplantation, one that aims to
improve a person’s quality of life. However, the challenge with improved lung function is it
may also contribute to smoking resumption, a plausible parallel since the opposite, a
decreased lung function resulting in smoking cessation, was confirmed in our case series.
Therefore, as Hofmann et al.
underscore with their conclusion of smoking resumption in post-transplant patients is
likely underestimated,
we believe our case series adds to the necessity that monitoring of smoking
resumption should be standard of care for post-lung transplantation evaluation.Tobacco dependence and nicotine addiction are chronic diseases with many factors, both
intrinsic and extrinsic, affecting the ability to quit and ultimately become tobacco
independent. For patients undergoing lung transplant evaluation, a need to abstain from
cigarettes prior to transplant should be met with similar priorities post-transplant. The
management, like other chronic diseases, warrants consistent reassessments. We believe the
aforementioned cases emphasize the need for international guidelines to offer
recommendations on screening for smoking resumption post-lung transplantation and
availability of immediate resources to help patients if they should relapse in an effort to
preserve transplanted lungs.
Authors: R Vos; K De Vusser; V Schaevers; A Schoonis; V Lemaigre; F Dobbels; K Desmet; B M Vanaudenaerde; D E Van Raemdonck; L J Dupont; G M Verleden Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Mary Amanda Dew; Andrea F DiMartini; Fabienne Dobbels; Kathleen L Grady; Sheila G Jowsey-Gregoire; Annemarie Kaan; Kay Kendall; Quincy-Robyn Young; Susan E Abbey; Zeeshan Butt; Catherine C Crone; Sabina De Geest; Christina T Doligalski; Christiane Kugler; Laurie McDonald; Linda Ohler; Liz Painter; Michael G Petty; Desiree Robson; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Terry D Schneekloth; Jonathan P Singer; Patrick J Smith; Heike Spaderna; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Roger D Yusen; Paula C Zimbrean Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Gerene S Bauldoff; Christopher H Holloman; Staci Carter; Amy L Pope-Harman; David R Nunley Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Larry D Jamner; Carol K Whalen; Sandra E Loughlin; Robin Mermelstein; Janet Audrain-McGovern; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; John K Worden; Frances M Leslie Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.244