| Literature DB >> 35023937 |
Mudit Sabharwal1, Anoop Misra2, Amerta Ghosh2, Gautam Chopra1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Poor glycemic control is prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India. This study aims to understand the effectiveness of a smartphone-connected glucometer, real-time feedback, and contextualized counseling on glycemic control and hypoglycemic episodes in T2DM patients.Entities:
Keywords: counseling; glucometer; glycemic control; self-monitoring of blood glucose; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35023937 PMCID: PMC8743499 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S345785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Figure 1Connected diabetes care program for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Characteristics of Patients Engaged with Digital Diabetes Engagement Platform
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Total number of type 2 diabetes patients (N) | 7111 |
| Gender distribution, n (%) | |
| Male | 5541 (77.9%) |
| Female | 1570 (22.1%) |
| Mean age (years) | 51.6 |
| Age distribution | |
| 18–40 years, n (%) | 1477 (20.8%) |
| 41–60 years, n (%) | 3619 (50.9%) |
| >60 years, n (%) | 2015 (28.3%) |
| Mean BMI (kg/m2) (n = 6082) | 27.1 |
| Mean duration of diabetes (years) (n = 6607) | 9.2 |
| Mean HbA1c level (%) (n = 992) | 8.4 |
| Total number of counseling sessions conducted | 9932 |
| Patients attending 1 counseling session n (%) | 5335 (75%) |
| Patients attending 2 counseling sessions n (%) | 1184 (16.7%) |
| Patients attending 3 counseling sessions n (%) | 357 (5.0%) |
| Patients attending 4 counseling sessions n (%) | 143 (2.0%) |
| Patients attending 5 or more counseling sessions n (%) | 92 (1.3%) |
Figure 2Improvement in mean BG values.
Figure 3Effect of SMBG-driven counseling on mean BG values.
Effect of SMBG-Driven Counseling on Mean Blood Glucose Levels
| Categories | Mean Values Pre- Counseling Mean (SD) | Mean Values Post-Counseling Mean (SD) | Absolute Difference in Mean | Percentage Change (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting (n = 3512) | 185.4 (67.3) | 167.5 (56.2) | 17.9 | 9.6% | <0.05 |
| Pre-prandial (n = 1574) | 214.5 (85.5) | 193.3 (73.6) | 21.2 | 9.9% | <0.05 |
| Post-prandial (n = 2296) | 225.9 (81.5) | 205.0 (68.6) | 20.9 | 9.2% | <0.05 |
| Fasting blood glucose values (n = 3512) | |||||
| 18–40 years | 203.3 (68.3) | 178.4 (59.4) | 24.9 | 12.2% | <0.05 |
| 41–60 years | 188.6 (64.8) | 170.5 (55.2) | 18.1 | 9.6% | <0.05 |
| >60 years | 168.8 (67.1) | 155.5 (53.6) | 13.3 | 7.9% | <0.05 |
| Pre-prandial blood glucose values (n = 1574) | |||||
| 18–40 years | 221.8 (83.6) | 196.9 (71.3) | 24.9 | 11.2% | <0.05 |
| 41–60 years | 217.1 (84.8) | 192.7 (75.4) | 24.4 | 11.2% | <0.05 |
| >60 years | 206.1 (87.2) | 192.1 (71.9) | 14.0 | 6.8% | <0.05 |
| Post-prandial blood glucose values (n = 2296) | |||||
| 18–40 years | 227.4 (81.2) | 208.1 (74.8) | 19.3 | 8.5% | <0.05 |
| 41–60 years | 230.5 (81.8) | 206.5 (67.7) | 24.0 | 10.4% | <0.05 |
| >60 years | 216.7 (80.3) | 200.1 (65.7) | 16.6 | 7.7% | <0.05 |
| Fasting blood glucose values (n = 3512) | |||||
| 1 session | 183.5 (65.6) | 165.7 (53.6) | 17.8 | 9.7% | <0.05 |
| 2 sessions | 190.5 (69.8) | 171.2 (58.3) | 19.3 | 10.1% | <0.05 |
| 3 sessions | 194.1 (73.2) | 172.1 (70.6) | 22.0 | 11.3% | <0.05 |
| 4 sessions | 190.8 (75.7) | 174.9 (61.8) | 15.9 | 8.3% | <0.05 |
| Pre-prandial blood glucose values (n = 1574) | |||||
| 1 session | 211.9 (84.8) | 191.8 (74.8) | 20.1 | 9.5% | <0.05 |
| 2 sessions | 219.5 (89.0) | 198.2 (73.6) | 21.3 | 9.7% | <0.05 |
| 3 sessions | 229.3 (88.7) | 189.9 (63.4) | 39.4 | 17.2% | <0.05 |
| 4 sessions | 214.5 (81.7) | 209.6 (77.3) | 4.9 | 2.3% | 0.7 |
| Post-prandial blood glucose values (n = 2296) | |||||
| 1 session | 224.8 (80.9) | 203.6 (68.3) | 21.2 | 9.4% | <0.05 |
| 2 sessions | 230.9 (81.6) | 208.6 (70.8) | 22.3 | 9.7% | <0.05 |
| 3 sessions | 220.6 (85.2) | 203.3 (64.4) | 17.3 | 7.8% | <0.05 |
| 4 sessions | 239.1 (88.2) | 217.6 (71.4) | 21.5 | 9.0% | 0.08 |
Notes: “n” signifies number of patients taking different types of SMBG readings. Percentage change was calculated depicting relative change of mean blood glucose values (pre-counseling % − post-counseling % / pre-counseling %).
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; SMBG, self-monitoring of blood glucose.
Effect of SMBG-Driven Counseling on Hypoglycemia Episode
| Blood Glucose Values, mg/dL | Pre-Counseling Hypoglycemia Episodes | Post-Counseling Hypoglycemia Episodes | Percentage Change in Hypoglycemic Episodes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Blood Glucose Values | No. of Values <70 mg/dL | No. of Blood Glucose Values | No. of Values <70 mg/dL | |||
| 18,003 | 734 (4.1%) | 18,721 | 316 (1.7%) | 58.5% | <0.001 | |
| 5794 | 302 (5.2%) | 6070 | 166 (2.7%) | 48.1% | <0.001 | |
| 9813 | 331 (3.4%) | 10,269 | 139 (1.3%) | 61.8% | <0.001 | |
Notes: “n” signifies number of patients taking different types of SMBG readings. Percentage change was calculated depicting relative % change of hypoglycemic episodes (pre-counseling % episodes − post-counseling % episodes / pre-counseling % episodes).
Figure 4Impact of SMBG-driven counseling on occurrence of hypoglycemia episodes.
Age Profiling of Patients Showing Hypoglycemia Episode Post-SMBG-Driven Counselling
| Age Group | Total (n = 959 Patients) | Improved (No BG Reading ≤70 mg/dL Post-Counseling) | Unimproved (At Least 1 BG Reading ≤70 mg/dL Post-Counseling) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 138 | 114 (82.6%) | 24 (17.4%) | |
| 173 | 153 (88.4%) | 20 (11.6%) | |
| 300 | 245 (81.7%) | 55 (18.3%) | |
| 348 | 269 (77.3%) | 79 (22.7%) |