Literature DB >> 35023041

YouTube as an information source on BRCA mutations: implications for patients and professionals.

Priscila E Laforet1, Bhavya Yalamanchili2, Grace C Hillyer1, Corey H Basch3.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations in early breast cancer has been shown to be beneficial, and an increase in surveillance using these genetic markers is recommended. Given this recommendation, it is likely that individuals gather information about such testing. Social media is increasingly becoming a common source of health information. One such platform known for sharing health information is YouTube. The purpose of this study was to describe content related to BRCA1/2 mutations on YouTube. The sample included 100 English language videos, which were coded for content related to BRCA1/2 mutations. The 100 videos evaluated in this study were viewed 5.5 million times. In general, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations were mentioned simultaneously, with only 15% of videos explaining the difference in prevalence or implication of the variants individually. A great number of videos (85.0%) discussed having genetic testing to determine the presence of BRCA mutations, but only 16.0% discussed the potential harms of BRCA mutation testing and 42.0% mentioned seeking genetic counseling to determine the need for testing and interpretation of the test results. Comparing the characteristics and content of videos created by healthcare professionals (n = 71) to those created by consumers and the media (n = 29), we found that consumer/media videos were viewed twice as many times as professional videos (3,704,351 vs. 1,851,825, p = 0.04). Videos from medical professionals should include consistent information on the recommendations for individuals who test positive for a BRCA mutation. Such content should include education about BRCA mutations, testing, implications of those results and ways to reduce risk, and recommendations for increased surveillance and enhanced screening for individuals positive for BRCA mutations.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35023041      PMCID: PMC8941008          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00576-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  17 in total

1.  Honing the health message on BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Charlie Schmidt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Readability of online breast cancer information.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Sarah A MacLean; Phillip Garcia; Charles E Basch
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  "I Am Uncertain About What My Uncertainty Even Is": Men's Uncertainty and Information Management of Their BRCA-Related Cancer Risks.

Authors:  Emily A Rauscher; Marleah Dean; Gemme M Campbell-Salome
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Examining information-seeking behavior in genetic testing for cancer predisposition: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Bettina M Zimmermann; Julia Fanderl; Insa Koné; Manuela Rabaglio; Nicole Bürki; David Shaw; Bernice Elger
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-09-17

5.  YouTube as a source of information on breast cancer in the Arab world.

Authors:  Georges Ayoub; Elie Chalhoub; Ghassan Sleilaty; Hampig Raphael Kourie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Role of BRCA gene dysfunction in breast and ovarian cancer predisposition.

Authors:  R Scully
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Celebrity disclosures and information seeking: the case of Angelina Jolie.

Authors:  Robin H Juthe; Amber Zaharchuk; Catharine Wang
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  YouTube Videos Related to Skin Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Cancer Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Charles E Basch; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Rachel Reeves
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2015-03-02

9.  Information needs on breast cancer genetic and non-genetic risk factors in relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant.

Authors:  Anne Brédart; Antoine De Pauw; Amélie Anota; Anja Tüchler; Julia Dick; Anita Müller; Jean-Luc Kop; Kerstin Rhiem; Rita Schmutzler; Peter Devilee; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sylvie Dolbeault
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; John L Hopper; Daniel R Barnes; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Thea M Mooij; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sarah Jervis; Flora E van Leeuwen; Roger L Milne; Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Matti A Rookus; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou; Lesley McGuffog; D Gareth Evans; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Julian Adlard; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Marc Tischkowitz; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Shirley Hodgson; Steve Ellis; Catherine Nogues; Christine Lasset; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Laurence Faivre; Pascaline Berthet; Maartje J Hooning; Lizet E van der Kolk; Carolien M Kets; Muriel A Adank; Esther M John; Wendy K Chung; Irene L Andrulis; Melissa Southey; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ana Osorio; Christoph Engel; Karin Kast; Rita K Schmutzler; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Michael L Friedlander; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Eva Machackova; Lenka Foretova; Yen Y Tan; Christian F Singer; Edith Olah; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.