Literature DB >> 35022911

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Intrasexual Competition Scale.

Graham Albert1, George B Richardson2, Steven Arnocky3, Brian M Bird4, Maryanne Fisher5, Jessica K Hlay6, Timothy S McHale6,7, Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon6.   

Abstract

The Intrasexual Competition Scale (ICS) measures the extent to which individuals view their interaction with same-sex others in competitive terms. Although it is frequently used in studies investigating differences in mating behavior, the factor structure of the ICS has never been confirmed. Researchers have yet to use multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis to test whether the properties of the scale are equivalent between the sexes. In Study 1, we report on an investigation in which participants' responses to the ICS were submitted to exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In Study 2A, we compared the fit of one and two-factor models from the EFA as well as two additional models, using confirmatory factor analysis with an independent sample. The best fit was obtained by a two-factor solution, which reflected: (1) respondents' feelings of frustration when intrasexual competitors are better off (Inferiority Frustration), and (2) respondents' enjoyment of being better than intrasexual competitors (Superiority Enjoyment). This model achieved a high degree of measurement invariance. In Study 2B, we found the ICS had good concurrent validity via associations with sociosexuality, mating effort, and sexual behavior. Together, these analyses suggest that the ICS is a valid measure of intrasexually competitive attitudes.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggression; Intrasexual Competition Scale; Intrasexual competition; Measurement invariance; Sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35022911     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02167-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  18 in total

1.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects?

Authors:  Timothy A Brown
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2003-12

2.  Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation.

Authors:  F X Gibbons; B P Buunk
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

3.  Redefine statistical significance.

Authors:  Daniel J Benjamin; James O Berger; Magnus Johannesson; Brian A Nosek; E-J Wagenmakers; Richard Berk; Kenneth A Bollen; Björn Brembs; Lawrence Brown; Colin Camerer; David Cesarini; Christopher D Chambers; Merlise Clyde; Thomas D Cook; Paul De Boeck; Zoltan Dienes; Anna Dreber; Kenny Easwaran; Charles Efferson; Ernst Fehr; Fiona Fidler; Andy P Field; Malcolm Forster; Edward I George; Richard Gonzalez; Steven Goodman; Edwin Green; Donald P Green; Anthony G Greenwald; Jarrod D Hadfield; Larry V Hedges; Leonhard Held; Teck Hua Ho; Herbert Hoijtink; Daniel J Hruschka; Kosuke Imai; Guido Imbens; John P A Ioannidis; Minjeong Jeon; James Holland Jones; Michael Kirchler; David Laibson; John List; Roderick Little; Arthur Lupia; Edouard Machery; Scott E Maxwell; Michael McCarthy; Don A Moore; Stephen L Morgan; Marcus Munafó; Shinichi Nakagawa; Brendan Nyhan; Timothy H Parker; Luis Pericchi; Marco Perugini; Jeff Rouder; Judith Rousseau; Victoria Savalei; Felix D Schönbrodt; Thomas Sellke; Betsy Sinclair; Dustin Tingley; Trisha Van Zandt; Simine Vazire; Duncan J Watts; Christopher Winship; Robert L Wolpert; Yu Xie; Cristobal Young; Jonathan Zinman; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-01

4.  The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction.

Authors:  D M Buss
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-04

5.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire.

Authors:  Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Steven Arnocky; Zeynep Senveli; Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-08-24

7.  Romantic preferences in Brazilian undergraduate students: from the short term to the long term.

Authors:  Felipe Nalon Castro; Fívia de Araújo Lopes
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2011-05-24

8.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?

Authors:  Paul W Eastwick; Eli J Finkel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-02

10.  Effects of smoking different doses of nicotine on human aggressive behavior.

Authors:  D R Cherek
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.