Literature DB >> 35022676

Supplying the pipeline of peer review: A call to engage new practitioners.

Tyler A Vest1,2, Carolyn M Bell3,4, Megan E Adelman5, Kellie L E Musch6, Claire A Latiolais7, Christina Y Martin8, Karen M Whalen9.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  learners; new practitioners; peer review; publication; research; residents

Mesh：

Year:  2022        PMID： 35022676      PMCID： PMC9274817          DOI： 10.1093/ajhp/zxac005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN： 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.980


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  The essential role of peer review.

Authors:  F Gannon
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Nick Black; Stephen Evans; James Carpenter; Fiona Godlee; Richard Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-02

3.  Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers.

Authors:  Mark A Kliewer; David M DeLong; Kelly Freed; Charles B Jenkins; Erik K Paulson; James M Provenzale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?

Authors:  N Black; S van Rooyen; F Godlee; R Smith; S Evans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Navigating manuscript assessment: The new practitioner's guide to primary literature peer review.

Authors:  Devlin V Smith; Laura B Stokes; Kayleigh Marx; Samuel L Aitken
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.809

6.  An editor's perspective on peer review.

Authors:  Guy R Hasegawa
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Improving peer review: What reviewers can do.

Authors:  Robert J DiDomenico; William L Baker; Stuart T Haines
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.637

8.  The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.

Authors:  A T Evans; R A McNutt; S W Fletcher; R H Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality.

Authors:  Michael L Callaham; John Tercier
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.

Authors:  Jacalyn Kelly; Tara Sadeghieh; Khosrow Adeli
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2014-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.