Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The essential role of peer review.

Literature DB >> 11559578

The essential role of peer review.

F Gannon.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2001 PMID： 11559578 PMCID： PMC1084042 DOI： 10.1093/embo-reports/kve188

Source DB: PubMed Journal: EMBO Rep ISSN： 1469-221X Impact factor: 8.807

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

8 in total

1. Is peer review censorship?

Authors: Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 3.441

2. Publishing your work in a journal: understanding the peer review process.

Authors: Michael L Voight; Barbara J Hoogenboom
Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2012-10

3. Supplying the pipeline of peer review: A call to engage new practitioners.

Authors: Tyler A Vest; Carolyn M Bell; Megan E Adelman; Kellie L E Musch; Claire A Latiolais; Christina Y Martin; Karen M Whalen
Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 2.980

4. Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data.

Authors: Michail Kovanis; Raphaël Porcher; Philippe Ravaud; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal: Scientometrics Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 3.238

Review 5. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.

Authors: Oliver Rudolf Herber; Caroline Bradbury-Jones; Susanna Böling; Sarah Combes; Julian Hirt; Yvonne Koop; Ragnhild Nyhagen; Jessica D Veldhuizen; Julie Taylor
Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 4.615

The essential role of peer review.

1. Is peer review censorship?

2. Publishing your work in a journal: understanding the peer review process.

3. Supplying the pipeline of peer review: A call to engage new practitioners.

4. Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data.

Review 5. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.

6. Interactive platform for peer review: A proposal to improve the current peer review system.

7. Toward scientific dissemination of undergraduate thesis in physical therapy programs - a cross-sectional study.

Review 8. The efficacy of powered toothbrushes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.