Daniel Kuhman1, Lloyd J Edwards2, Harrison Walker3, Christopher P Hurt4. 1. Rehabilitation Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To establish criterion and construct validity of a novel, clinically feasible assessment of lower-extremity dexterity for PD patients. METHODS: Thirty-three PD patients performed a unilateral lower-extremity dexterity task "off" and "on" dopaminergic medications with each leg. The task involves iteratively tapping targets with the foot in a specified pattern, and the measured outcome is the time to complete the movement sequence, with longer times indicating worse performance. We correlated leg movement time with standard, validated measures of gait (comfortable and maximal walk speeds), general mobility (timed up and go), upper-extremity dexterity (9-Hole Pegboard), and elements of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). RESULTS: We found significant relationships between lower extremity dexterity and each of these tasks "off" and "on" medications. Task performance also captures known features of PD, including dopamine-mediated improvement in performance and asymmetrical symptom presentation. CONCLUSIONS: This task provides a simple assessment of lower extremity function that correlates with validated measures of dexterity, gait, and mobility. It provides objective, continuous data, is inexpensive, requires little technical expertise/equipment, has a small physical footprint, and can be administered quickly. These features increase the feasibility of implementing this assessment tool in clinical settings.Implications for rehabilitationWe introduce a novel task that captures lower extremity dexterity in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD).The task is validated against gold standard measures of upper extremity dexterity, gait, and general mobility.Performance on the task is sensitive to known features of PD, including dopamine-mediated improvements and asymmetrical symptom presentation.The task is easy to implement and provides higher quality data compared to other common clinical assessments (e.g., MDS-UPDRS).
PURPOSE: To establish criterion and construct validity of a novel, clinically feasible assessment of lower-extremity dexterity for PD patients. METHODS: Thirty-three PD patients performed a unilateral lower-extremity dexterity task "off" and "on" dopaminergic medications with each leg. The task involves iteratively tapping targets with the foot in a specified pattern, and the measured outcome is the time to complete the movement sequence, with longer times indicating worse performance. We correlated leg movement time with standard, validated measures of gait (comfortable and maximal walk speeds), general mobility (timed up and go), upper-extremity dexterity (9-Hole Pegboard), and elements of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). RESULTS: We found significant relationships between lower extremity dexterity and each of these tasks "off" and "on" medications. Task performance also captures known features of PD, including dopamine-mediated improvement in performance and asymmetrical symptom presentation. CONCLUSIONS: This task provides a simple assessment of lower extremity function that correlates with validated measures of dexterity, gait, and mobility. It provides objective, continuous data, is inexpensive, requires little technical expertise/equipment, has a small physical footprint, and can be administered quickly. These features increase the feasibility of implementing this assessment tool in clinical settings.Implications for rehabilitationWe introduce a novel task that captures lower extremity dexterity in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD).The task is validated against gold standard measures of upper extremity dexterity, gait, and general mobility.Performance on the task is sensitive to known features of PD, including dopamine-mediated improvements and asymmetrical symptom presentation.The task is easy to implement and provides higher quality data compared to other common clinical assessments (e.g., MDS-UPDRS).
Authors: Raul Martínez-Fernández; Rafael Rodríguez-Rojas; Marta Del Álamo; Frida Hernández-Fernández; Jose A Pineda-Pardo; Michele Dileone; Fernando Alonso-Frech; Guglielmo Foffani; Ignacio Obeso; Carmen Gasca-Salas; Esther de Luis-Pastor; Lydia Vela; José A Obeso Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Gammon M Earhart; Jim T Cavanaugh; Terry Ellis; Matt P Ford; K Bo Foreman; Lee Dibble Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Elizabeth L Stegemöller; Joe Nocera; Irene Malaty; Mack Shelley; Michael S Okun; Chris J Hass Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Christopher G Goetz; Barbara C Tilley; Stephanie R Shaftman; Glenn T Stebbins; Stanley Fahn; Pablo Martinez-Martin; Werner Poewe; Cristina Sampaio; Matthew B Stern; Richard Dodel; Bruno Dubois; Robert Holloway; Joseph Jankovic; Jaime Kulisevsky; Anthony E Lang; Andrew Lees; Sue Leurgans; Peter A LeWitt; David Nyenhuis; C Warren Olanow; Olivier Rascol; Anette Schrag; Jeanne A Teresi; Jacobus J van Hilten; Nancy LaPelle Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 10.338